First you get some rats and back a rat to win! NO, just kidding!!!
I should state the premise of the system: IF YOU LOOK AT ANY DECISION AND THEN JUST TO THE RIGHT, ONE UP, MIDDLE AND ONE DOWN--YOU WILL RARELY FIND THREE OF THE OPPOSITE COLOR.
Look closely at my scan. I've been watching this phenomenon for days on end. I finally copied a trot and here it be.
There are columns a b c d e
The decisions within the first column are numbered
x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
x
and so on for the next columns.
You make no bets until column A is full and the next decision will start column B.
There are triggers. They are numbered. The Xs are not triggers and will not be used except for bets.
Here we go.......................................
Column A is full. We look for our first trigger. It is the 1, Banker, in column A. What we are going to bet for is that the first, second or third decision in column B will match the 1, Banker. The first one does.
Column A 2. We look to the right. We look directly across from the 2 and one up and one down. See my scribbling. We are betting that our trigger in any column will be repeated in either the bet above, beside or below it. Scribbling....
Go to Column C, bet 7, Player. Look to the right and up one and you see Player.
Now, I would use a 1 2 4 martingale or my old favorite 1 on a loss; -1 on a win.
Here's where it gets snakey...............................
Look at column A, bet 2 Banker. Your first bet would be on column B, 1, Player--a loss. Now you must continue that progression, but a second bet appears with Column A, 3, Banker. You would bet your Column A, 2 and 3 both and both would win when column B, 2, Banker appears.
Well, what do we think?
Not sure what to do with the ties yet.
Someone or several someones should get to work on this. I have my winning baccarat system. Here is your chance to get yours.
Imagine, as JL would say,---that's John Lennon, by the way---when you lose on roulette you can replenish your bankroll on baccarat.
Oh, stop with the silly applause!!!
Sam
Sam.
Checking your IDEA right now !!!!
Dino.
dino
Help me figure out what to do with the ties and what kind of progression to use.
Let's all row this boat across the finish line and get our Gold Medals.
Sam
Sam.
I think i gave the impression i know this game......i know noooooothing !!
BUT thanks to your efforts,as of tomorrow i am going to my local library and take a book out on it and start swotting up !!!!
I have wanted to play it for years now i will ( brain willing )
Cheers.
Dino.
Pretty cool concept, Sam. How are we playing step 10? Are we moving to the next column? Also, are your "green" dots "ties"? I'm assuming if they are ties your are moving down to the next bet for a decision as to whether to play Banker or Player, is that right?
Nice post, Sam. I'll definitely be spending some time on this.
Best, WG
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Aug 15, 02:11 PM 2012
The Xs are not triggers and will not be used except for bets.
Can you expand on this? How did you determine the color of your "x"'s?
Wally
Look at the chart. If you used the very first decision in the column, you could not have one above it. There are none. Don't know what to do with green. Yes, it is a tie.
I did not determine the color of anything. They are what they are.
Imagine this:
X P
P B
B P
B
P
Suppose the X was player. How could you bet the one above? There is none. Look at the next in column A. It's P. Look right, up. You have a P. Winner. Back to column A. You have B. Look right, up. You have a B. . Winner. And so on
The thing forms a triangle of sorts.
P
P B
B
Turn it 90 degrees clockwise and you have a triangle.
P
B B P
Sam
Sam, can you take a look at the attachment. Thanks.
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Aug 15, 09:45 PM 2012
Don't know what to do with green. Yes, it is a tie.
My suggestion would be to disregard it, your bet comes back anyway. Continue to play as you've outlined.
Sam, I don't get those "X"'s and why they are different colors? I'm sure I'm missing something here, I'm tired and ready to hit the sack. Will look at this in the AM again. If there's an answer, appreciate it if you can provide it.
Thanks. I've got about 100 recent shoes I'll run this through. Should be interesting and be able to provide you with feedback when I'm done.
Wally
Wally
I guess you're aware I wrote in the Xs, not the casino. The X simply means that decision is not a trigger. The first trigger is 1 in each column.
If you're still confused, I can make a short movie.
Sam
Sam, so do you only bet right, up
bp <--- bet for b lose
bb <--- bet for p lose
pb <--- bet for b win
bp <--- bet for p win
pp
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Aug 15, 02:11 PM 2012
Here's where it gets snakey...............................
Look at column A, bet 2 Banker. Your first bet would be on column B, 1, Player--a loss. Now you must continue that progression, but a second bet appears with Column A, 3, Banker. You would bet your Column A, 2 and 3 both and both would win when column B, 2, Banker appears.
hi Sam, on your column A, bet 2 Banker, you have a loss to begin with, so you're next betting 2units in that particular progression (if you're doing the martingale) - but you also have Column A, 3, Banker requiring a 1unit bet to start its own progression - does that mean you would bet 3 units there?
Gents
I am going to hand-draw an example and scan it. I will use the chart I posted. Yes, it sometimes requires three bets at once, all at different levels. Sometimes...........
Does it stand a ghost's chance in hell of winning? Time will tell.
Sam
OK, see if this helps.
Now we are talkin--A Sammy Bammy Bacc System --- will look to see if I understand
Sammy Bammy smack your Mammy! Eat crawfish in Alabammy. Roulette makes sweat, get clammy! Love it; I don't give a dammy!
Somebody stop me!
Me gets it now ,,, plenty of ways to bet that one for sure,, wait for a loss and play the next two, straight thru etc
You got it!
Tested a shoe or two, not so bad...... I bet thats how you score your regular game also ? up and down like that ?
Hello Sam!
Very interesting!
I will try checking. Maybe we have to pass first virtual loss and play lost +1 win -1.
Guys
Movie coming as soon as it's finalized.
Sam
link:://youtu.be/Aqpp1gbHhkQ (link:://youtu.be/Aqpp1gbHhkQ)
These movies are good for me. Saw lots of room for improvement!!
No need to stop at the bottom as the top continues the bottom.
:-\ It's me ol' haid!! No so bright!
Sam
TwoCat,
Why did you choose the length of 10 for a column. Have you observed this happening only at this interval?
EZ
That's just the way it shows up at Dublin. No particular reason.
Sam
Sam, I've run this through 50 shoes so far and the results are at +1.38 per shoe, accounting for bank fees. This was flat betting.
You're a good man, Wally Gator!
I'll bet ten per hand!!
What did you do about the ties?
Sam
Sam,
i tested this to at Dublin, made an account for it :)
and when i see 2 ties, i bet for a 3th tie, it works sometimes, not everytime but its worth the 8/1 payout :)
Whoh....
You mean three ties in a row:
B
T
T
T
P ???
I very rarely see three in a row.
Sam
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Aug 20, 04:04 PM 2012
You're a good man, Wally Gator!
I'll bet ten per hand!!
What did you do about the ties?
Sam
Sam, I ignore the ties .... no win no loss .... simply replay the last bet.
Thanks!
Sam,
not 3 ties in a row
i mean diagonal
P P P
P B T
B T B
T B
P
Stephan
Approximate occurances of runs for either Banker or Player
Coup of 1 25 %
Run of 2 25%
Run of 3 20 %
Rub of 4 12 %
Run of5 7 %
Runof 6 5 %
Run of 7 3 %
Run of 8 2%
Run of 9 1%
I have come across this listing posted by a proferssional baccarat player from the UK. Live B & casinos and not timid with his bets.
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Aug 16, 01:54 PM 2012
You got it!
@ TwoCatSam:Still playing this mate ?
Never did. Just something I thought up.
I played it a few times with real money. To many streaks of misses for me to continue with it. Good idea, though, Sam.