Just thought I'd add a spin on my 'in the 9' method which I will bring to this forum soon.
So in the original we had a 3x3 grid searching for repeating vertical and horizontal DS. My twist is to test using an even simpler 2x2 grid but (cheers to Chris again or the idea!) try and catch them on tw diagonal too.
So our basic grid would look like this:
6,4
6,1
In this one we'd win on the vertical second DS 6
2,3
3,5
In that one, you see that you'd win on the diagonal 3 DS
so the top left hand DS you note down to begin with. The second DS is the top right hand of the grid.
The second bet is for a repeat of the top left and diagonal of top right. And the third bet is horizontal of bottom left, diagonal to top left and vertical to top right. Don't worry it's easier than it sounds!
If anyone can advise a progression to manage these three bets per grid that would be great
BW
This is an example of flat betting which is maybe the safest way to utilise this strategy.
You'll get more 2,3,4 grid losses in a row here than with the 3x3, but should pick up decent winnings by using the diagonal bet too.
5,3,
5,1
+3
5,6,
3,3
+4
6,6,
4,3,
+9
5,6,
3,1,
+3
2,4,
5,6,
-3
2,2,
4,4,
+2
so are you continuing until 2x2 grid is complete, regardless of early win ?
so you are betting first on one DS, then 2 and then 2 again?
simple +1/-1 per game should do the trick?
since it is only 5 units risk per game and the average win is 3 units you need 2 wins per 1 loss to be ahead flatbetting - not bad at all
1 1 win continue grid? or wait for another spin and begin new gird
Quote from: soggett on Jun 01, 01:17 PM 2013
so you are betting first on one DS, then 2 and then 2 again?
simple +1/-1 per game should do the trick?
since it is only 5 units risk per game and the average win is 3 units you need 2 wins per 1 loss to be ahead flatbetting - not bad at all
Take this grid for example
3 2
6 2
First bet is 1 unit for repeat of the 3
Second bet is 2 units for repeat of 3 and 2
Third bet is 3 units for repeat of 3,6 and 2
So 6 units in total - after a win ulster, just start
a new grid
BW
Another version for U guys to ponder on.......
Enter the 4 corner dia spins to set up Ur base bets.
then, choose which corner U want to infill, and play those two DS's
ran a quick live real money test, I am liking this bet - not as aggressive as 3x3 grid
1,6
3,1
+0
2,2
+5
6,4
4
+3
2,2
+5
4,4
+5
5,4
3,3
+0
2,2
+5
3,4
3
+3
2,3
2
+3
1,4
1
+3
4,4
+5
6,3
1,4
-6
33 spins +31 units
nice :)
now to test -- see how this holds up - like the tweak bw, nice one
first test
500 spins
flat bet -22
+-1, progression -158
is there more to this
progression needs work
Quote from: Chrisbis on Jun 01, 01:48 PM 2013
Another version for U guys to ponder on.......
Enter the 4 corner dia spins to set up your base bets.
then, choose which corner U want to infill, and play those two DS's
Now ain't that a beautiful thing, dontcha just love a good matrix topic lol
Quote from: ulsteroptom on Jun 01, 03:11 PM 2013
first test
500 spins
flat bet -22
+-1, progression -158
is there more to this
progression needs work
'Fraid not ulster
Perhaps it signs the death knell of this brief method
The drawing board beckons...
what about after a win or lose, cycle the number of no bets
win
wait 1 spin before next bet
win
wait 2 spins before next bet
lose wait 3 spins
win
wait 2 spins
just cycle through as to not make the bet selection static
possibly avoid a bad run