I have tested this for a few weeks now with Wiesbaden live spins and the results are very good so I would like to hear your opinions about it.
I tested like this:
- only play the first dozen, this is the way I played it but just chose your own bet selection !
- start to play with 2 units
- ad a unit after a loss till you are on a new high
- then return to the 2 unit bet
- If you win your bet but your are not on a new high, play the same bet size again. So only ad one unit after a loss.
I saw something like this on the forum already but I made a little twist to prevent big drawdowns.
- adjust your betsize if you are within one spin from a new high...................... example: you have to bet 21 units but you are only 6 units from a new high, then play 3 instead of 21 units. 3 units will bring you to a new high after a win. If you lose that bet you ad one and play 4 units.
I tested this for a few thousand spins already and it goes smoothly. It is also easy to controle the progression.
Works great....till it doesn't. Tried it and get smacked hard a few times. Pls be careful.
Denzie
Quote from: denzie on Apr 18, 06:19 PM 2015
Works great....till it doesn't. Tried it and get smacked hard a few times. Pls be careful.
Denzie
I know what you mean. But I tried to controle the progression by adjusting it when possible. Only in one session I played I went under -500 units........... I recovered but in real life I would have stopped.
I tested a few more life spin sessions, with a good stop loss it could be a nice way to play.
Eddy, I have a few questions, please. I will put them in red by your statements.
Quote from: eddy35 on Apr 18, 04:47 PM 2015
I have tested this for a few weeks now with Wiesbaden live spins and the results are very good so I would like to hear your opinions about it.
I tested like this:
- only play the first dozen, this is the way I played it but just chose your own bet selection !Since bet selection doesn't make a difference in the long run, why not?
- start to play with 2 units I don't understand why you start with 2 instead of 1. And if 2 works better, why not 3 or 4?
- ad a unit after a loss till you are on a new high
- then return to the 2 unit bet
- If you win your bet but your are not on a new high, play the same bet size again. So only add one unit after a loss.I think this is a good move. When we're betting large bets, why not drop back when we win something like 2 times in a row or 2 out of 3 bets or maybe if a single win drops you back quite a bit, say 1/2 to 3/4 of what you were down, you might consider decreasing the size of your bet here also. Anything to mitigate the effect of a really bad run starting when you're betting large bets.
I saw something like this on the forum already but I made a little twist to prevent big drawdowns.
- adjust your betsize if you are within one spin from a new high....within one spin or maybe 2 or even 3 spins.................. example: you have to bet 21 units but you are only 6 units from a new high, then play 3 instead of 21 units. 3 units will bring you to a new high after a win. If you lose that bet you ad one and play 4 units. Let's say our next bet is 25 and we're at -100. A couple of wins brings us clear, but a few losses (few can be anywhere from 3 to 20 and at 25 + units per loss, we're in big trouble. Why not calculate how much we would have to bet if we won the next 2 bets. This gets our bet size down quite a bit. It reduces our risk in exchange for a longer time to reach full recovery.
I tested this for a few thousand spins already and it goes smoothly. It is also easy to controle the progression.
Quote from: GLC on Apr 18, 09:05 PM 2015
Eddy, I have a few questions, please. I will put them in red by your statements.
I start with 2 instead of 1 just to increase the profit a little bit. For the progression it doesn't make a big difference.
There are different ways to controle the progression. Just make the changes that work for you. My impression is that you are always within 3 spins from recovery most of the time. You can see in the sessions I posted that there is always one big hole........... but it always recovers quickly and the needed bankroll is acceptable.
The last point you made seems an interesting thought............... I will play a little with to see how it performs.
I just tried the same progression on even money bets........... it also works fine.
Hi eddy,
I remember I did a test and posted vids of using a progression on EACH dozen separately to see how it performed over the same numbers...
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13830.msg119052#msg119052 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13830.msg119052#msg119052)
(Used GLAT progression)
A.
Quote from: atlantis on Apr 19, 07:58 AM 2015
Hi eddy,
I remember I did a test and posted vids of using a progression on EACH dozen separately to see how it performed over the same numbers...
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13830.msg119052#msg119052 (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13830.msg119052#msg119052)
(Used GLAT progression)
A.
I was also thinking about trying my progression with different dozens. But you cab also play it with 2 even money bets.
I played the same spins from Wiesbaden on black and red using the same progression......... both winn
One just a little, the other a bit more.
Tested 23 sessions of about 80/100 spins
Stop loss was -100.
Lost the bankroll of 100 in 4 sessions, won 19 sessions. Total balance + 503
I think this is promising !
I play european roulette with 37 numbers
I place a £1 on 5 numbers on each spin for 200 spins
Total money spent is £2000 £5 x 200
I lose 123 spins And win 77
(1 win equals 1x35 payout)
What is my loss and total win
Quote from: icashbot on May 01, 11:50 AM 2015
I play european roulette with 37 numbers
I place a £1 on 5 numbers on each spin for 200 spins
Total money spent is £2000 £5 x 200
I lose 123 spins And win 77
(1 win equals 1x35 payout)
What is my loss and total win
£1772 if u can win 77 out of 200 with betting 5 numbers (if u can keep that up your betselection is golden)
you lose £615
you win £2387
and you spend only £1000 because 5x200 is 1000 ;D
Any thought on playing differential bets on each dozen, betting both the 2 dozens with the highest bet total? After the first spin, you will already have the 2 chosen as the winner stays 2 and the others climb to 3. Play until a high on each progression independent of the others?
really like the idea of playing all 3 dozens
Quote from: soggett on May 01, 12:39 PM 2015
£1772 if u can win 77 out of 200 with betting 5 numbers (if u can keep that up your betselection is golden)
you lose £615
you win £2387
and you spend only £1000 because 5x200 is 1000 ;D
thanks i realised my mistake :twisted: