On the whole group of 3x obviously!

No one see the floating 4
       1         2        3         4
1x   06      23     03       20
2x  18       28     01       02
3x  18       03     28       35
4x  18       22     08       15
5x  18       21     15       17
6x  21       18     34       17
7x  21       19     17       22
8x  21       19     17       01
9x  21       01
10x 01
The floating 4 at times has the static 4.
See 7x-4 the #22 its a win but from the floating 4.
Go to 4x-4 the #15 its a win for the floating 4. It obviously was a 3x but where?

6    1    3    8    21    14    13    35    13    30
23    1    35    15    17    16    4    12    16    16
3    2    28    25    36    36    1    12    1    4
20    11    25    22    19    27    31    19    32    3
12    34    16    27    26    21    0    1    1    11
18    14    33    22    15    22    30    20    0    36
28    0    32    33    21    18    8    22    10    20
21    3    19    15    2    19    4    19    2    36
15    7    17    22    30    12    6    17    12    1
22    4    18    12    17    34    19    22    36    6
0    18    14    8    32    5    23    10    25    2
2    6    21    15    34    1    13    3    31    4
27    31    10    32    36    3    17    10    32    13
34    8    18    21    35    14    1    17    7    22
35    27    13    12    21    28    7    32    29    35
18    20    36    10    26    4    4    32    6    20
19    10    33    34    2    36    21    25    10    25
28    7    8    17    0    20    3    8    35    9
25    16    9    16    17    34    19    8    27    1
26    26    35    21    16    5    28    9    29    33
Timestamp: 2024-11-19 17:51:36 UTC
200 #'s
Clue #1= 10x

AMK the floating hot 4. Not top 3

34181   5155   225819   249932   1.1067802             
34361   5184   226071   250364   1.1074574 
34501   5197   226147   250580   1.1080403

Rand org, so, much harder than R-sim         

timestamp: 33:00

journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/1827

The Subject's Self-Description of the Process of "Reading"

Some insights into the hit rate, which is inexplicable by chance
expectation, may be rendered by the subject's own description of the
"reading" process. D. Shen and his assistant conducted a few interviews
with the subject, one of which was done immediately after completing
the cumulative trial number 32 in Wuxi City that resulted in a full hit of
the code ZUZXH. According to her, after she was able to get enough
focus on the reading, the characters appeared on the so-called "third
eye region," which is in the anterior domain or in the vicinity of the
frontal lobe. The characters would appear once, but were unstable, and
the arrangement of the characters at the beginning was often wrong.
The subject claimed that she needed to wait for some time for the
characters to stabilize, before affirming what the characters and their
order really were. The instability or the momentary nature of the imageformation could be associated with some of the partial misses that were
incredibly close to full hits. For example, in trial #14, the code LB2JM
was read as LJ2BM. All five characters were correct, but the sequence
was missed. Several other trials ended up with similar levels of partial
misses, including trials #8 (target: AC2MJ; reported: ACBMJ), #10
(target: AJT31; reported: AJT3D), #11 (target: AC9LJ: reported: ACSLJ),
and #23 (target: QLWGP; reported: QLNGP). In each of these trials,
only one character out of the five positions was erroneous


Is There an Alternative Channel of Information Transfer in the
Altered/Alternative State of Consciousness?

The instability of the image formation, as perceived by the subject,
may be appreciated with the average time taken to affirm a "reading."
The times taken to reach a full miss, a partial miss, and a full hit were
statistically insignificant. However, the p = .06 between the times
taken to make a full hit (13.8 ± 3.6 minutes) and a partial miss (18.5 ±
4.7 minutes) is interesting. If more testing were done to increase the
sample sizes, it might have been possible to see a statistically significant
difference in the time taken to make full hits vs. partial misses. With p
= .06, the average time taken to make a full hit was shorter than the
average time taken to make a partial miss, indicating that the more
certain the "image-formation" was, the less time was taken in hesitating
to call a code. With p = .06, the standard deviation of the time taken
to make a full hit being smaller than that taken to make a partial miss
implies that the clearer the "image-formation," the less hesitation there
was before calling a code.
We postulate that the subject's psychological and perhaps
physical condition could have influenced the outcomes of the trials.
In the first three trials in Yangzhou City, the subject felt fresh, excited,
and had slept well the previous day. And that preceded her amazing
demonstration in the small-sampled single-blind trials. The subject
was in considerably less optimal psychological and physical states in
the two tests subjected to double-blind readings. Traveling and being
in an unfamiliar environment farther away from home could have
made the subject's psychological and physical condition deviate from
her more accustomed and energetic state. The lesser excitement and
the likely increased psychological/physical/stress of the subject over the
total of three separate tests at different sites could have affected the hit
rate. The demonstration test had an amazingly high rate of 2 full hits
out of 3 trials, followed by the test in Haikou producing a much lower
rate of 3 full hits in 16 trials, with the last test in Wuxi producing an even
lower rate of 2 full hits in 18 trials. As elaborated on previously, the high
hit rate in the demonstration trial could have been associated with its
single-blindedness, as it was difficult to reject a telepathic informationtransfer pathway which would depend upon D. Shen either intentionally
or subconsciously transmitting the code or that the subject somehow
could have accessed the code stored in D. Shen's consciousness space.
Should that single-blindedness alone in the demonstration test not be
the reason for the high hit rate in that test, and had the psychological/
physical condition of the subject remained indifferent in all tests, the
declination of the hit rate over the subsequent phases of trials would
be consistent with the "declining" effect (Jahn, 1982) which has been
regarded as a hallmark of ESP or psi-like demonstrations.
The subject's self-disclosed experiences were unfamiliar to an
ordinary person. Those experiences, however, may imply a connection
between an extraordinary consciousness state and an extraordinary
perceptive faculty. We postulate that a special process of consciousness
might have been voluntarily practiced by the subject in presenting ESI
against a visual sensory barrier and other demonstrations inconsistent
with common sense (Gimeno & Burgo, 2017). According to D. Shen
(Shen, 2010), a "Second Consciousness State" (SCS) that may be akin
to an alternative or altered state of consciousness could have been
experienced by the subject in demonstrating ESI against a visual
sensory barrier, or in any other phenomena inconsistent with common
sensory responses. D. Shen suggested, based on earlier interviews
with some presumably gifted subjects who also claimed extraordinary
demonstrations of ESP faculty, the following: (1) the success of such
demonstrations was highly correlated with a consciousness state
different from the normal waking state; (2) the consciousness state
deviating from the normal awake state was perceived to engage with
the appearance of a momentary low-resolution image-formation of the
test sample over a "third-eye screen," as it was called by a lay gifted
person claiming experiences similar to that of the subject of this study.
We regard ESI against a visual sensory barrier as a manifestation
of information acquisition using channels that are not yet known, i.e.
via an alternative channel of information transfer. We further postulate
that entering an alternative state of consciousness is needed to open
consciousness to information that cannot be reached by ordinary
sensory means, thus activating an alternative channel of information
transfer. Such an alternative channel of information transfer could
also imply an alternative channel of energy transfer which would then
potentially permit some mind–matter modulations to manifest as
psychokinesis.

The subjective experiences similar to those claimed by the subject
of this study would be extremely challenging to validate by means of
instruments. It may be possible, however, to objectively monitor the
state of perception that deviates from the normal awake state. Any state
of consciousness must have a neurophysiological manifestation, as it
ultimately involves synchronization of neurons over spatial networks
and it would maintain certain levels of temporal coherence over the
duration of the state. We envision that special states of consciousness
that may be associated with ESI against a visual sensory barrier
could be amenable to instrument measurement such as by electrical
encephalograms, which showed unusual neurophysiological bursts at
moments of psi presentation in a presumably gifted subject (Gimeno
& Burgo, 2017). Access to readings of neurophysiological states could
shed light on what differs in the neuromodulation of sensory and perisensory responses between normal consciousness states and altered
states of consciousness that are believed to be directly associated with
the phenomena of extrasensory faculty.

Yes it is. I think he for that moment in time managed to channel something. I'm not saying everything he says is true. He is also a trump supporter so he obviously wanted to trump to win but still impressive as you say. He also makes a prediction about there being an economic crash during trumps term, which for a trump supporter seems more like an objective revelation than simply his own wishful thinking.

Ok then that is very specific to predict he'd get a bullet in the ear. Impressive stuff.

11 mins in. On 14 march 2024.

When was that video first posted as that one was just after the Butler assassination attempt?

Hello everyone!

I apologize for the post, which may seem like an imposition of the offer. However, I really think that this may be interesting for many people who are passionate about casino games, and in particular - roulette!

I have been developing automated systems for calculating roulette bets for more than 15 years, and recently I have implemented an absolutely innovative solution with which you can import numbers from LIVE table statistics, and instantly run them through 6 statistical algorithms.

Add to this an ability to set any number of numbers in prediction and your own progression, and you get the extremely effective tool with very impressive results!

Moreover, you can learn how all the algorithms and function work by reading the detailed manual at the website (as well as request a trial).

Please take a look when you have time:

Roulette VARIATOR PRO:
:.bestrouletteapp.com

Thank you for your attention!

P.S.: I'm ready to answer any questions...