Priyanka, would this be on the right track?

"Place each spin selected into the pigeonhole corresponding to its largest odd divisor (which must be one of  1, 3, 5, . . . , 17)." (Dyksexlic)

"All the numbers in roulette are connected logically and consecutively.  Always choose your pairings going forward." (VADDI)

Badger - Am not claiming that I know the solution. That puts me in a place where am not qualified to say this approach is right or wrong. However pigeon hole pricinple, friends and strangers theorem does have legs and we will have to do some kind of pairing to create dependencies. So yeah, we need to think in the direction you are stating here if we have to induce dependencies.

Thanks Priyanka 

rrbb:

To give you a quick start and something totally out of the box:
1. Of course numbers cannot be predicted. This is the most important fact. All roulette systems based on prediction are futile. Please keep on trying. This is extremely stupid, all people who keep on doing this do not deserve a HG!

lol, this one killed me.  Plenty of system (and spreadsheet) sellers may want to read this one a few times...

VADDI said something similar :

"To demonstrate how deep my thinking has gone, let me ask this question?
Based on what I've said about balance and connected numbers (based on the pairs table) ...
How could you use already landed numbers to 'predict' numbers that are likely to land next?
Now, that is the kind of mad-scientist question that leads to the grail.
No, you can't precisely predict which number will land next, but there's a way to get as close as you possibly can.
Please don't try to answer this question. I'm just throwing it out there. But it has do with observing how numbers connect to each other after every 4 spins, based on the pairs table. "

I know that RRBB and VADDI are not the same person, but consider this :

They both base their approaches on repeaters.
They both have a framework “going forward”.
They both use cycles.
For both, the last 4/5 spins are the spins that they are “interested”  in.

Hey Badger
Maybe this will help - I don’t know but I do know a ton of people behind the scenes have all the info redd “never shared before”

See below. Good luck.
>>>>>>

Sorry for the long pause: indeed traveling for work.

OK, now keep your hat one, here it comes: everything told you is true: except for one thing: the HG I gave you.

In a minute I will give you the real one, so do not get angry: I just wanted to test you. This is a tremendous gift, and I just wanted to make sure you are the right person. I never shared tis before.

You are indeed no fool, you keep your act together, and most important, you are a decent, responsible person. This is like the box of Pandora, treat in carefully! (actually better, play it RNG at home, stay below the radar, do not get greedy)

VdW is really great, and cycles are great, and indeed while working with these, I stumbled on my method. It is different from Priyanka's.

Look at the numbers: 36 (or 37, 38). You can create all kind of halves.
1. let's use the high/low
2. let's create DYNAMIC halves for these partitions (i.e. a partition is a grouping of numbers, straights are partitioned in groups of 1 number, splits are groups of 2 numbers etc): straights, splits, street and double street in the following manner:
A. keep track of the unique "partitions" till you have half: so in case of straights, make sure that the halve has the last 18 unique numbers etc
B. Do this for all partitions
C. Now bet that the next half will be the same as the previous one (so you bet the last 18 unique numbers in case of straights, the last 9 unique splits in the case of splits etc)


I leave the betting amounts to you, and no, no progression is needed...

good luck!

Btw: this has everything to do with cycles

Quote from: 3Nine on Oct 16, 03:49 PM 2017rrbb:

I hope you played with Nicksme excel. If so, you would have noticed that sometimes it is a tie: both R and B would lead to an AP. in around 12% of the cases this happens.

There are now two options: either we lower the number of L's in the bets that we would place make (no tie),

OR we create a second stream on which we would bet in case of a tie (or maybe, we ONLY bet when we have a tie on the first stream).

Hint: start playing around with a new "stream":
if two subsequent colors are identical, we give it the value "1". Otherwise we give it the value "2". This is an half again!

Now we apply VdW sequence on this new stream, we ONLY bet when the first stream has a tie, and when the second stream would indicate we should bet (so no tie on the second stream, but with the possibility of an AP).

I leave the details to you. Do you notice anything???

what should i see, once i have done this?
i noticed that if we bet only when its a tie on the first stream, on the second its never a tie.

Quote from: 3Nine on Oct 29, 06:22 PM 2017
I don’t know but I do know a ton of people behind the scenes have all the info redd “never shared before”

Funny because this is the info that was shared with you personally by redd, so your one of those ppl!

Quote from: praline on Oct 30, 10:37 AM 2017


what should i see, once i have done this?
i noticed that if we bet only when its a tie on the first stream, on the second its never a tie.

I don't think this is the correct way because what 3nine failed to mention was that in that same letter redd said this is not the way!  I believe it's good but not the HG we been searching for

So I think the same idea is used but with different information.

thanks for saving me some time.

Quote from: praline on Oct 30, 10:37 AM 2017Quote from: 3Nine on Oct 16, 08:49 PM 2017
rrbb:

I hope you played with Nicksme excel. If so, you would have noticed that sometimes it is a tie: both R and B would lead to an AP. in around 12% of the cases this happens.

There are now two options: either we lower the number of L's in the bets that we would place make (no tie),

OR we create a second stream on which we would bet in case of a tie (or maybe, we ONLY bet when we have a tie on the first stream).

Hint: start playing around with a new "stream":
if two subsequent colors are identical, we give it the value "1". Otherwise we give it the value "2". This is an half again!

Now we apply VdW sequence on this new stream, we ONLY bet when the first stream has a tie, and when the second stream would indicate we should bet (so no tie on the second stream, but with the possibility of an AP).

I leave the details to you. Do you notice anything???



what should i see, once i have done this?
i noticed that if we bet only when its a tie on the first stream, on the second its never a tie.


 

SORRY, GUYS. THERE WAS A CODDING ERROR. NOTHING TO CONSIDER IN THIS POST.

Quote from: 3Nine on Oct 29, 06:22 PM 2017

A "Good bye" would be better. Thanks for your help.

This one must be correct... with a little tweak
1 million spins 226 units of profit 
And it goes directly to my collection of winning systems. The collection is now expanded from 0 to 1... what a great achievement after 3 years of rx, readings and writings with testings...LOL

Quote from: praline on Oct 30, 01:41 PM 2017
A "Good bye" would be better. Thanks for your help.

😂

I don't know what got into this guy!  I guess he mad at everyone 😂