Ive been backtesting this and it goes well and yes its freaky

Big M
Hear what i'm writing, i was a big fan of this method.

I use to bet the trigger number with a prog of 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,10,15,20,25,35,50 - 14 spins, it won on FOBT's for months, then it started to lose. I'd see it miss for 34 spins. ( think about it) say your betting a section of 9 numbers in one of the dozens, how many can a dozen sleep for.

So sticking to 4 bets is a safe way.

Now as the ball was bouncing around the mat as waahome said, i wondered what it would be for the same idea but on the wheel. Maybe Ignatus has a method like this.
You note the number, lets say zero, and this way you can cover zero,Zeros spread is 12,35,3,26,0,32,15,19,4 lets say 25 hits, its spread is 19,4,21,2,25,17,34,6,27. 
So zero hits, next spin is 25, the 2 sections overlap like the mats method, so bet the 25 section of 9 numbers, if the ball moves away and triggers in a new section, i left the original trigger and started on the new.

I dont know why i stopped, think KTF was having a tweek.

also i have all the time in the world to place the wheel method or any method, as i'm on the FOBT and i push the button, so if it takes 1 minute thats okay.
Only problem is, i would think every winning ticket is flaged up and scrutinized, so they can rework there algorithm, as these mickey mouse roulette machines are there for you to lose not win.

Quote from: nottophammer on May 19, 04:29 AM 2017same idea but on the wheel. Maybe Ignatus has a method like this.

Hi Notto!

Yes i have! The original "Wheel of Fortune", link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18787.msg175346#msg175346

i had very good result playing it also, i didn't know why i forgot about it? thx for reminding me

Hey notto
I go to a b&m casino my backtesting is looling really good 4 this pne thanks for the info matey ...more research for me ...i reckon ur better than priyanka ...buddy

The top picture is the numbers posted in this thread. Using top3. You would tell me you could not make a profit with #9. Those in the know; when was #1 picked up.
The second picture we can see how betting top3 makes a good profit.

Hi notto,
in the picture below my row number 3 is somewhat different to yours.
Could be it's not important ?

Who starts lap 3?
Is 9, 1st or 20.
Look at 4th line of 6 numbers; where is #9

Webby.
Great idea asks for advice.
Instead of going around the world let us go straight to the point.
In Turbo's advantage of repeaters 3.
The opening graph shows 1st three to complete each lap from 1x to 20x. To the right side of the picture, he shows how many numbers have shown in 60 positions. There are 11 numbers and shows how many times appeared.
Some would like to use 1 number, so, position 1; most call this the leader.
Let us look at #7, position 1x-3. It's 1st appearance. Hope you've copied the picture.
If you look at the appearances, Turbo says 13 appearances. At 20x he shows 474 spins.
What if you bet the #7 all the way to 20x?
Now my math could be a bit off here.
#7, 1st show's at spin 3. It's last appearance is spin 474.
471/19= 24.78 spins.
This average says #7 hits every, round up 25 spins. Obviously, some laps take longer than 25 spins; maybe 38. Then other laps might be around 14 spins.
But the average is 25 spins.
What about #10, 2x-3 and at 20x-3. Did it only show 4 times. Yes, if you only see a picture for 1st 3.
When at 20x we see 7-8-10; on laps 17x-18x-19x-20x where is #5. It might be hitting better than 35-1. What of the riddle those at positions 4-5-6 even 7-8-9 horses. He does mention 9 horses.
I'll leave it here.
Perhaps herby has some thoughts for this?

Take a look

37/74/111

Hy notto,
thanks for answering.
Tomorrow tuesday I'll find more time to study your answer, today I'm finished, too much work.   

Grandpa = Priyanka. 

So what?

Hi Notto,
thanks again for your input above, its programmed.
Tomorrow I'll search for longterm negative streaks.
CU

Herby
Should horses #'s 10 up to 37 be considered.