The only thing I am getting is a waiting game until now.. no matter how y combine a and B..

Yes I mentioned a waiting game according to my understanding of what Tricycle is sharing.  That's why I'm asking him questions to see if he can clear it up.

Quote from: alexlaf on Jan 17, 02:24 PM 2024The only thing I am getting is a waiting game until now.. no matter how y combine a and B..

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Jan 17, 02:16 PM 2024But what you do with the combination is what matters.

I'm trying to stay on topic with Tricycle. Maybe he will share some other forms of how to combine or what to do to the combination after it's combined...

At least with the waiting way as I am doing it the first element can determine what will come next but not constant!

QuoteHey, guys

Too simple I guess... also there is no milion trackers, and screenshots, so definitely a rubbish, I guess
Also it's only 2 pages, topics with 100 pages are definitely better))

Thanks for your inputs, TriCycle.
It will take me a while to understand your way of reasoning. But everything seems to be in line with what I'm heading to.

Have a nice day everybody!

How many streams we need finally, do we keep adding streams like endless combinations!
Here is another stream!!! 

Alexlaf, in my opinion all those new streams are needed to change the way we look at random, remember those constants within/with cycles of dozens.
After that i will look into limited events on that new stream and will try to apply some of "will definitely happen with in n spins" theorems to it. Somebody told once that vanderwaerens theorem is just betting the dominant or maybe I'm generalising it a lot, on the other side "betting the dominant" and "betting same defining element" is the same thing.

Quote from: praline on Jan 28, 06:53 AM 2024"betting the dominant" and "betting same defining element" is the same thing.

I know that betting on what y said is a weak structure so it is not the way to beat the game!

Not to be rude. I know that you don't "know" that, you just read that from rrbb's notes.

And if you remember, in the part you are referring to, there is also a word "maybe".

So just "maybe" you are right, and I'm going in the wrong direction, but i love this direction because its mine))) and as far as i know your and Mel's researches didn't bring you anywhere.

What is your way!
They reached to a point where it was safe to say that non of what they investigate was not the way!
I have no idea what Mel is doing..

My way is to try things even if "the others" said it's impossible. Maybe you will also conclude that that's impossible, but you will definitely learn more when you reach that point step by step and your conclusion will be more juicy))

I appreciate your input Praline, I for sure have tried what was pointed and the opposite.
There are things that you indeed see and impressive, but not what we call "solution", or it is and I can't see it.

There was one last Priyanka's post in august or July of 2013 (before she started random thoughts topic). This post is about singles and series on R/B. Recently i started from there, as Tricycle poined to series, and i found some iteractions with newest Priyanka's topics ("difference of 1 or 0"), so I'm investigating this path for now, of course by adding cycles and positions to it. Give it a try, it's fun)) but i don't promise it will make you rich.