Good to see you back around Priyanka. I'm sure anything you can share which would give some sort of edge would be greatly appreciated by all - even if it isn't the Holy Grail everyone has been searching for all these years.

Cheers!

Akiraa

Quote from: Akiraa on Aug 01, 04:49 AM 2024I also recently unearthed a whole chat from 'The Children of the Light' group which was set up back in the day to discuss Dyksexlics teachings

Akiraa is this on the way , that would be nice!!

OK as promised here is the recently unearthed 'Children of the light' chat from years ago. Below is the part of the chat where one of the members (i think this may have been Red Dwarf / RRBB but can't be 100% certain - showing as C in the chat log) apparently found the secret behind Dyksexlics method after some brain storming with another member.

You can see they said they had it and would share but to my knowledge this never happened and the group fell away shortly after. Posting here for all in the hope someone may be able to figure it out.

Cheers!

Akiraa

[10:05:03 09/05/2011]
C: there are 4 subsets on either colour
C: odd low
C: even low
C: odd high
C: even high
C: if i say black even high is referring to 20 22 24 26 28 and nothing else
C: if 24 show you play on the whole subset
C: inside bets
C: 5 chips
C: but 2 chips on either black odd and low
C: if a black show
C: it must be that subset or if not then 4 chips win 2 chips loss on even chances
C: you understand it?
C: whats the purpose?
C: to have a repeat on that subset and win 33 chips!!!!!
C: seeking a subset will repeat - outside bets feeding partially inside bets
C: seeking the big win
C: with the inside bets
C: there are 8 subsets in total plus 0
C: but dont doubt it - D. plays 38 chips on every bet
C: that's why he talks about 38 x 36
C: well
C: 38 x 2 = 76
C: 76 x 36 = 2736 chips - D. bankroll
C: 38 spins worse scenario
C: 36 chips for every bet
C: well this is going too far for the moment - talking about amounts of chips to bet
C: but most important we need to find how he makes both brothers win every cycle playing this way
C: 1 brother playing on black, the other one playing on red
N: i think he play 76 unit for 38 spin
C: yes you are right i agree
N: hmm...
C: but of course there are losses till we achieve a win
N: something wrong
N: 76 x 38 = 2888
C: 76x36 2736
 C: right
N: but he said 38 spin
N: 1 st spin no bet
C: well this is my 2 cts assumption
C: im not talking about percentages for the bets
N: 72 x 38 spin = 2736
C: yes thats right too
C: wait a moment please
C i got to go guys
N: thanks C... really appreciate it
N: one thing about betting outside bet is we need to take care of the zero- still scratching my head
C: no big worries about 0
C: D. treats it like another number
C: he seek 0 repetition if it shows
N: thanks for the brainstorming
C: welcome mate


[11:59:54 09/05/2011]
ND: what are you guys discussing? Found out anything interesting?
C: maybe ND i dont know for sure
ND: oh?
C: read my previous ideas here talking to N
C: some brainstorming mate
C: it is explained there it is not difficult to follow believe me please
C: read it carefully and you 'll see my point
C: copy  paste and save conversation and think about it
ND: C, u saying D is telling the truth?
C: yes
ND: You believe him 100% now?
C: sure he was telling the truth - 100%
C: center on D. teachings there are so many clues hints in this writings
C: it is in a way that we haven't deduced yet
C: but it has to do playing opposites
C: a trap
C: the roulette can't avoid it
C: or it can avoid it till 37 spin at the most
C: D. is very smart guy mate
C: and his nick means dyslexic
C: it is a clue too lol - dyslexics misconfuse things
C: or mis understand
C: so the trap has to do with two natures
C: two opposites natures
C: one winning all the time
C: false winnings
C: till the real BIG win falls on the other side
C: you dont mind it losing all the time cos when it loses it will give all the bets to the other side
C: like a ladder
C: well a ladder beats roulette
C: this one is so consistent it beats the roulette in the last spin if necessary
I: but also I think one of the biggest clues is... That roulette is confined randomness...
C: order kills randomness
I: I mean if 1 shows it always is going to be red, odd and low... It's not 1 black even high
C: yes you are on the right way mate
C: two brother playing opposite
C: one brother winning all time while the other losing
C: at the end the winnings change hands with a profit
C: the higher the wait the higher the price
I: say for instance there were 18 different reds...
I: you are all betting them, because you are waiting for a repeat...
I: So it would then be a good thing to bet black (EC) as well...
C: yes both
C: your winnings are paid by the casino after a win
C: in a ladder
C: till the ladder fall on the other side
C: you are betting all time with casino money!!!!!
C: till it reverts on the other side!!!!!
C: one playing inside bets mate
C: the other playing outside ones
C: if outside winning all the time the inside waiting for it chances meantime

[12:18:19 09/05/2011]
C: I solved D. riddle
C: I will share it with you in the proper time
C: soon
C: forget about dozens and streets
C: focus on high low colour and inside bets
C: thats all
C: D. bets all numbers all the time
C: but it has to do with percentages in chips
I: not always remember...
I: he sometimes bets all numbers...
C: some numbers are inside all numbers
I: but he always bets some...
C: yes
I: so some is not all?
C: yes some is all
C: because some is included in all too
C: he couldnt say plainly he bets all numbers
C: a combination of inside and outside bets
C: but this way all numbers
I: It has to be something like that I'm sure....
C: including 0
C:  if i tell you it is a bet with casino money i tell you almost all
C: with the money paid for the casino
ND: Tho i didn't understand everything, as i am very new to roulette..
C: well ND - copy paste and save your reading
C: ill post it
N: I hope u post that message..
C: yes ill do
C: ill share with you how to beat rng
C: 100% guaranteed lol
C: maybe you'll see it before i have to share
N: C, do you think you have got it?
C: i know i have got it
N: man! Ur making me excited here..
I: you got something RD
C: and ill share it with you that was the purpose in this forum right?
C: i know the answer mate
I: and that is?
C: 100% guaranteed
C: it's got to do with what ive written here yes
C: but if you dont see it for your self ill share
C: it is my word ill do
ND: RD, i didn't understand much of it.. But i hope u can explain it a little easier.. As i read through it fast..
C: well ND take your time i want some work on you to make you think
ND: i am trying, but the thing is: I am very new to roulette etc.. So im not so good in figuring things out etc..
C: it is here in this chat mate hahahahah
I: Now I'm really confused
C: today i give away the solution
N: I, it's here in the chat!
N: scroll up..
C: yes i think so I but try to understand what ive already written
N: C, i hope u mean this that u really got it
C: ive come on the solution after talking to N
C: just this morning mate
C: and has to do with outside bets combined with inside bets
C: think mates
C: one brother playing red
C: another playing black
C : continuous play
I: you mean with the subsets?
N: yeah, i understood that.. but i don't know how they can help each other..
C: not necessary subsets
C: no just play
C: no gamble
C: playing for sure
C: a win for sure
C: all numbers at a time
C: crazy lol
C: but not impossible
ND: have you tried it yet?
C: D. is very very smart man
C : yes ive tried it already
C: and no matter if the rng delete the winning
N: can you say to me honestly: N i have the HG
C: i have HG N yes
C: but only for rng
N: i don't care! Rng is fast
C: you cant play it on based landed casino
C: welll mates i must leave it - will share it with you no doubt
C: but first think a bit
C: i must leave now
N: C! Thanks for everything...
C: see you in any moment soon
C: welcome mates
N: Don't be gone too long!
C: no for sure
C: ciao

Quote from: Akiraa on Aug 02, 06:26 AM 2024Cheers!

Appreciate that.

Akiraa - post above is not really Priyanka.  It's MumboJumbo messing around.

The post above reminds me of a question I asked a member a while back -

If Player 1 could only see Colors and Player 2 could only see Numbers, could both players Win?

Thank you, Akiraa!

Akira awesome post!  It's amazing how we went down almost a similar path in our conclusion of how the twins work.

The way I looked at it....1 bet keeping you in the game until the real bet wins

I enjoyed reading that 

Some good information there guys!

Very welcome all. The idea here is to share everything I have so hopefully it will spark some ideas and if anyone gets anything from it and want to share either privately or on here all the better! Keep going guys the solution is definitely out there. We just need to find it!

Cheers!

Akiraa

It's good to always take a break and go back to the info shared.  Looking at things with fresh eyes and different understanding.

I'll share this gem with you guys since we are on the topic of twins maybe it will make more sense for you, maybe not!  But enjoy anyways...

Dyksexlic said "the opposite of a profound truth is also a profound truth"

**Twins don't always have to be identical there are different types of twins but still twins 

Happy searching!!! (Praline enjoy the journey my friend, be thankful to those guys because without them many of us would still be trying to martingale even chances  )

Is there any connection what Akiraa posted with this part:

A. I bet on all previous unique numbers
B. I add a second Result stream, the opposite from A, but shifted 1 spin:

E.g.
A. -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, +30
B.  0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -30

A is a losing proposition, B is a losing proposition. However, combined they give a winning system (when we have a repeat we break even at least)

We now also know that the A and B "systems" must be interwoven: at any time, we can NOT create 2 bets that totally separate A and B!
example to illustrate this concept: bet on number 1, and on low. when 1 hit, we have the proceeds of 1 AND the low, so A consists of the low bets, however, when 1 does not hit, but low hits, the low acts like the B system. Again, this is just an example to illustrate the interwovenness of A and B. There is now way we can split the two bets in the above example into A and B. They are a unity
What also should become clear: It could just occur that we MUST bet all numbers on the table!

Quote from: alexlaf on Aug 03, 07:14 AM 2024Is there any connection what Akiraa posted with this part:

Yes, and no reason for that to be posted on the forum!

Any piece of private information shared with ppl ends up on the forum.  I can see why ppl stop helping.  No matter how much ppl beg and say they won't share with anyone.  🤦�♂️

Completely agree, with MONEYT101!!

Thabks, Akiraa, for your inputs

I'm out.

Tobacco Vanille, what's S & D?

Quote from: TRD on Aug 03, 07:41 PM 2024Tobacco Vanille, what's S & D?

23 doz 2
15 doz 2
---------
20 doz 2 (s)
---------
19 doz 2 (s) 
---------
15 doz 2 (s) S123 on the AP progression

29 doz 3
11 doz 1
29 doz 3
------------
15 doz 2
20 doz 2 (D)
-------------
27 doz 3
32 doz 3 (D)
--------------
10 doz 1
12 doz 1 (D) D123 on the AP progression

To get a higher concentration of S rather than D, you need to get more groupings of either 1, 2 or 3.
They don't HAVE to be the actual dozens themselves. You have to manafucture them yourself. That's why I said I don't believe that the Cycles or the AP progression work out of the box. You need to create the environment to make them work. But the kicker is that if you can do that, then you don't even really need them although admittedly they can act as a signal (especially the S123) as to when you are in profitable situations.

I hope that helps you TRD.

Cheers