• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Single events using bollinger bands observations for even money bets

Started by ego, May 18, 08:33 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

ego

Hi all ...

Well maybe I post this in the wrong section as its not about flat betting and 94/94 is very good - thanks.
For me is how the LW-Registry peform due to fluctation that is intressting.

This as follows is what I like with this bet selection.

It take andvantage out of two single events using bouth series and singels by them self.
Bout is dominanting every distribution during larger sampel around 1024 trails and above.

You can view it like this using the law of series that if you only use series then they will also apply to the law of series.
There will be more single series then there will be two series in a row and two series in a row will be more then three series in a row- that is series that chop no matter lenght after each other.

So we bet there will apper single series and we bet there will be traditional singels events by them self - its like riding two horses in the same time.

Should also mention that randomness start to become very clear for me how it behave.
Is not so random as you think it is.
If you study the three states you will see that not matter what random sequense you have in the past or in the future - they all is alternating zick zack that is pretty cool and just strike me yesterday - so I assume there exist many ways to explore that using 1/3 probability or 3 states.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego


Just want to mention this is not a HG and i dont search for one.
I just think its intressting that all three states creates singels, series of two in a row and so on using bollinger bands or that kind of observations.
Also that every state is alternating zick zack when they not appers as singel events.
Pretty cool.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

Red Nickels

Quote from: ego on May 20, 01:32 AM 2011
Hi all ...

Well maybe I post this in the wrong section as its not about flat betting and 94/94 is very good - thanks.

how is 188 bets, win 94 of them and lose 94 of them, very good?

albertojonas

ego,

do you look for a serie to break (betting for return to the serie when it breaks 2 times -i think you said)

do you also bet on singles like

R
R
B (here bet R for break series)
R (it is a win.)
B now bet for break the series of singles also? -ie. Bet B for repeat or create a new series of B?


Very interesting concept  >:D

albertojonas

@Ego


It is frustrating so see that maybe you did drop this line of thinking.
there is further i would love to discuss with you. Per example could you answer me to the qquestion on the previous post?


woods101

Hi Ego,

Have you explored this any further?

Thanks
woods

-