Trying to understand the FIVE

[TwoCatSam]

****Relax Sam that's a different method I'm.playing in conjunction with FIVE. I play 2--4 mthods at the same time as standard. This is why Ill never be bored.*******

It is also why your test is invalid and it is also why we, your admiring public, will never be able to follow your method.  Did anyone else think this was a test of the FIVE and the FIVE only?  Am I the only peep in the dark here?

This is exactly why I've said over and over again, we need screen capture movies to see exactly what a person is doing.

I'm a little miffed.  I've spent hours trying to understand this method, only to find out it is not the method at all--just one of a conglomerate!!

Sam






   

[Twisteruk]

Sadly I have to agree with Sam. Im a fan JL but all the points raised by Sam are valid, imo

Atlantis avoided the subject and I wondered why until he posted he didnt understand it either. He may now I dont know but for Atlantis not to get something you know the way in which the infomation is being given is not the best

For example, Einstein, at the time, was the be all and end all on his chosen subject but could he have taught it to us ? No. It would of been way above our heads.

I teach, and you have to pitch the info to different ppl at different levels

Again, its not who is right and who is wrong its just an observation backed by fact.

[TwoCatSam]

Suppose you had this, using John's short hand:

A   B   C
4
2
4
    4
    5.......WIN

Now, suppose I just sat down at the table right after the first "four gap" and did not know about it.  My tracking would not refelect the win.  So the second "four gap" on A and the only "four gap" on B would be part of my play.

John, is that right or wrong?

Suppose by pure, Holy Luck I walked up to the table at just the time John was going to bet against the fourth "four gap" forming and I bet on the same two dozens he did.

He lost.  I did the exact same thing.

He lost the second bet.  I did the exact same thing.

He lost the third bet.  I did the exact same thing.

He won his fourth bet.  He says he is running over 1000/1 in won progressions. 

The big pregunta..........

Does that mean the four times I bet just like John, I had a thousand to one chance of winning??

People, you gots to ask yourselves these questions.  John should willingly answer.

Sam

[Ralph]

I have never been trying "FIVE"!
First I do not like DD play.
Second I do not want to wait long
for a trigger.
Third I do not fancy hefty progressions
if the gain is small.
Fourth as most seems to have some
difficulties to understand the rules
i suppose I will have it as well.

I do think it can be possible to
win small and the losses may be rare.

Make 1000 wins in a row needs more than
small luck, but not impossible.
I think some of you understand how DD
can behave.