6-SHOOTER Roulette System (modified matrix)

[gimmealickin]

I have taken the foundation of the matrix system and extended it to 6 instead of 4. Which allows a 4 level progression. I use and it wins very often. Actually it seems to always win. I play it at Dublinbet. I have started to input the 4000 actual spins that someone posted from Dublinbet and after 264 spins it is 87-0 so far.

How it works:

    1 A 2 B 3 C - alternate recording dozens and columns till you reach 6 and then start a line under
it. Once I have 2 lines I will then start betting on the 3rd line diagonally from the first line.

Like this:

    1 B 2 A 3 B
    2 C 3 B 3 C
    3 A   <------------------- Bet here against the 1 in the first line. So we would bet our unit size on 2 and 3. It is that simple. Then after that one we would start betting the opposite side. So we would bet against B, the last one in the 1st row. Do this back and forth and triple up when a loss occurs. If a 0 occurs at the beginning or end of the 6, we do not play that line. Enjoy.

[gimmealickin]

After 492 spins I am currently 157-0. Playing quarters, this really starts to add up. So up 157 units. In the event that I ever have a loss, I will increase the bet on the next sequence.

[gimmealickin]

Today I am playing my system along with pattern breaker. My system is 22-0 and PB is 2-0. I am really liking what I see. Playing the table min. at Dubin on Doz/Col which is 2.5. Will continue to keep testing.

[ashwinsinha]

I have taken the foundation of the matrix system and extended it to 6 instead of 4. Which allows a 4 level progression. I use and it wins very often. Actually it seems to always win. I play it at Dublinbet. I have started to input the 4000 actual spins that someone posted from Dublinbet and after 264 spins it is 87-0 so far.

How it works:

    1 A 2 B 3 C - alternate recording dozens and columns till you reach 6 and then start a line under
it. Once I have 2 lines I will then start betting on the 3rd line diagonally from the first line.

Like this:

    1 B 2 A 3 B
    2 C 3 B 3 C
    3 A   <------------------- Bet here against the 1 in the first line. So we would bet our unit size on 2 and 3. It is that simple. Then after that one we would start betting the opposite side. So we would bet against B, the last one in the 1st row. Do this back and forth and triple up when a loss occurs. If a 0 occurs at the beginning or end of the 6, we do not play that line. Enjoy.

nice another random vs random  nice creativity

anyways whats the progression you stated +3 on a loss right and its on double dozen/double column right...... so our progression for 3 losses in a row will be

1-1 3-3 6-6 correct

i bet you are creating 2nd line just like that for random beating right..... we dont use 2nd line atall for betting plz correct me......

[rossg]

Hi gimmealickin,

Could you please clarify the 4 step progression you use on this system. The normal double dozen progression 1/1, 3/3, 9/9, 27/27 but ashwinsinha says in his post 1/1, 3/3, 6/6.

Clarification would be appreciated.

Ross

[mushi45]

Hello,


Thank you for sharing.
I don't really understand your six. Are they 6spins or three spins combining dozens and columns?
For instance, the number 3. It is located in the 1st dozen and in the last column (I guess letter c). Are you going to write, for that number 3, 1 C?


Also, I don't understand your bet. Are you going to bet onto the 2 chances at the same time?
So, if you have written 1 C, what are you going to put 1 token onto the third dozen(3) And onto the 1st column (A)?


If so, when do you play the second dozen and when do you lay the second column?


Can you please give some detailed examples?


Thank you beforehand.


Regards.

[Turner]

Gimme...creative and trendy.
Trendy? well this is a trend Johnlegend made popular...Dozens or EC forming patterns that have limits like Red wont hit more than 15 etc and Creative? well, you recognise that this pattern idea isnt a holy grail and the fact that you have to sit waiting for a 500 spin trigger to hit the grail is not worth it. You are trying to speed the idea up with a trigger closer to reality.

ive tried so many of these ideas (my own never published) and even yours looks familiar. I think I did this somewhere in the madness of idea inventing.

The pattern will show its self and kill you. it allways does.

[mushi45]

Thank you Turner for your quick answer.
It's true that 500 spins in a real casino represents quite a lot of time.


Like you, I imagined a lot of systems  but haven't found the holy grail yet (that suits to me). Many seem having found the one that suits to themselves.
I am happy for them!


Regards.

[Turner]

Thank you Turner for your quick answer.
It's true that 500 spins in a real casino represents quite a lot of time.


Like you, I imagined a lot of systems  but haven't found the holy grail yet (that suits to me). Many seem having found the one that suits to themselves.
I am happy for them!


Regards.

Mushi....your brackets (that suit me) are perfect....and a nice caveat..."I am happy for them"

Good words mate

BUT....lets get finding what suits us eh?

Turner

[GLC]

1 B 2 A 3 B
2 C 3 B 3 C
X    X X   X

We could add 2 more for 4 bets per line.

[mushi45]

BUT....lets get finding what suits us eh?


Hi Turner,


Nice philosophy!
I have read and tried a lot of systems or methods.
Many, even most of them are good as long as the "long serie against it" doesn't appear. so, we might even say in this meaning that even the martingale (Hawks) is in a certain way valable.


BUTdue to the fact that most of these systems need an increased bet, I always loose at longer term. Of course, the benefits plus the bankroll!
In fact, each time, I lost my time and my energy.


What I think that would be more profitable is to use a system with flat bets or almost flat bets. In that case, if the long serie against us appears, one wouldn't loose the benefits already made plus the bankroll.
Of course, I haven't found it yet....


One book inspired me: "thirteen against the bank" from Norman Leigh.
I don't know if it really happened but the fact is that the principe is interesting. Often loose a small amount and once win a big amount! In fact, the contrary of what many gamblers are doing...


For the moment, I stopped going to the casino. Maybe I became paranoïd, but I think that the casino is tcheating (ball going backwards at the end??)


Best regards