• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

A catch up quick strategy

Started by keel44, May 12, 03:08 AM 2013

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

keel44

I offer this strategy for EC bets.  You will need a 160 unit bankroll.  It sounds kind of ridiculous, but it just might work.  Let us see

You start off flat betting 1 unit. 

You keep flat betting until your balance is -5 units.  Once at -5,

You will try to get it all back with a one time bet of 5 units.  If you win, begin again.  If you lose,

You are down -10, now flat bet with 2 units until your balance reaches 0 or -20.  If -20,

You will try to get it all back with a one time bet of 20 units. If you win, begin again.  If you lose,

You are now down -40, now flat bet with 8 units until your balance reaches 0 or -80.  If -80,

You will try to get it all back with a one time bet of 80 units.  If you win, begin again.  If you lose -- ALL DONE



Whenever your balance is 0, you flat bet with 1 unit. 
You only go for the "homerun" attempt when your overall balance is at -5  -20 or -80.
The rest of the time you flat bet with the amounts I gave.


We should now test her out

weddings

You tested this? I can tell you it won't work for long you are only dragging things out.
-----

Turner

It looks like you already admitted it is designed to lose. No mention of winning anything. :ooh:

ego


How about you place three bets and if you don't win you quit.
Keep loses short or lose less when you lose.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

keel44

It is kind of like a martingale built around flat betting.  I have not tested this.  I was hoping someone would create like a spreadsheet tester where you would enter in your numbers and see what could happen.

-