• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

In the 9 Modified

Started by buffalowizard, Jun 01, 09:29 AM 2013

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

buffalowizard




Just thought I'd add a spin on my 'in the 9' method which I will bring to this forum soon.

So in the original we had a 3x3 grid searching for repeating vertical and horizontal DS. My twist is to test using an even simpler 2x2 grid but (cheers to Chris again or the idea!) try and catch them on tw diagonal too.

So our basic grid would look like this:

6,4
6,1

In this one we'd win on the vertical second DS 6


2,3
3,5


In that one, you see that you'd win on the diagonal 3 DS

so the top left hand DS you note down to begin with. The second DS is the top right hand of the grid.
The second bet is for a repeat of the top left and diagonal of top right. And the third bet is horizontal of bottom left, diagonal to top left and vertical to top right. Don't worry it's easier than it sounds!

If anyone can advise a progression to manage these three bets per grid that would be great

BW

buffalowizard

This is an example of flat betting which is maybe the safest way to utilise this strategy.


You'll get more 2,3,4 grid losses in a row here than with the 3x3, but should pick up decent winnings by using the diagonal bet too.

5,3,
5,1


+3



5,6,
3,3


+4


6,6,
4,3,


+9


5,6,
3,1,


+3


2,4,
5,6,


-3


2,2,
4,4,


+2

ulsteroptom

so are you continuing until 2x2 grid is complete, regardless of early win ?

soggett

so you are betting first on one DS, then 2 and then 2 again?

simple +1/-1 per game should do the trick?
since it is only 5 units risk per game and the average win is 3 units you need 2 wins per 1 loss to be ahead flatbetting - not bad at all
To beat the game you first have to realise you can't beat the game - then comes the hard part

ulsteroptom





1  1  win  continue grid? or wait for another spin and begin new gird

buffalowizard

Quote from: soggett on Jun 01, 01:17 PM 2013
so you are betting first on one DS, then 2 and then 2 again?

simple +1/-1 per game should do the trick?
since it is only 5 units risk per game and the average win is 3 units you need 2 wins per 1 loss to be ahead flatbetting - not bad at all

Take this grid for example

3 2
6 2

First bet is 1 unit for repeat of the 3
Second bet is 2 units for repeat of 3 and 2
Third bet is 3 units for repeat of 3,6 and 2

So 6 units in total - after a win ulster, just start
a new grid

BW

Chrisbis

Another version for U guys to ponder on.......

Enter the 4 corner dia spins to set up Ur base bets.
then, choose which corner U want to infill, and play those two DS's
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

ulsteroptom

ran a quick live real money test, I am liking this bet - not as aggressive as 3x3 grid


1,6
3,1


+0


2,2


+5


6,4
4


+3


2,2


+5


4,4


+5


5,4
3,3


+0


2,2


+5


3,4
3


+3


2,3
2


+3


1,4
1


+3


4,4


+5


6,3
1,4


-6


33 spins +31 units
nice :)




ulsteroptom

now to test -- see how this holds up - like the tweak bw, nice one

ulsteroptom

first test


500 spins


flat bet -22
+-1, progression -158


is there more to this


progression needs work

buffalowizard

Quote from: Chrisbis on Jun 01, 01:48 PM 2013
Another version for U guys to ponder on.......

Enter the 4 corner dia spins to set up your base bets.
then, choose which corner U want to infill, and play those two DS's

Now ain't that a beautiful thing, dontcha just love a good matrix topic lol

buffalowizard

Quote from: ulsteroptom on Jun 01, 03:11 PM 2013
first test


500 spins


flat bet -22
+-1, progression -158


is there more to this


progression needs work

'Fraid not ulster

Perhaps it signs the death knell of this brief method

The drawing board beckons...

ulsteroptom

what about after a win or lose, cycle the number of no bets


win


wait 1 spin before next bet


win


wait 2 spins before next bet


lose wait 3 spins


win


wait 2 spins


just cycle through as to not make the bet selection static
possibly avoid a bad run




-