Those Crazy Double Dozens

[GLC]

1-1;  1-2;  2-1
2-2;  2-3;  3-2
3-3;  3-4;  4-3
4-4;  4-5;  5-4
5-5;  5-6;  6-5
6-6;  6-7;  7-6
Etc...

That's the new double dozen progression.

We 1st bet 1-1 if we lose we bet 1-2.  We bet the 1 on the last dozen to spin and we bet the 2 on the next to the last dozen to hit.  If we lose we bet 2-1.  We bet the 2 on the last dozen to spin and the 1 on the next to the last dozen to hit.

We always bet the 1st number in our pair on the last dozen to hit and the second number on the next to the last dozen to hit.

When we lose the 3rd bet on a level we drop down to the next level.

When we are betting a bet made up of 2 different numbers, like 1-2 or 4-3 etc..., if we hit on the larger bet of the 2 we move 1 step back toward the beginning of the line.  So, if we are betting 5-4 and we win on the dozen with 5 units bet on it, we move back 1 step.

Using the above example, if we win on the dozen with 4 units bet on it, we must play that same bet again.  We must win 2 times before we move back if we win on the smaller number.  This is also true if we are playing the same units on each dozen.  So, if we're betting 2-2; 3-3; 4-4; etc... we must win twice before we can more back 1 step.

The exception to the rule is if you are betting 1-2 or 2-1 and you win on the 1 unit bet, you have only broken even so you repeat the bet again until you lose or win on the 2 unit bet.

Anytime we reach a new high profit we start over with our progression.

If you don't like my bet selection method, then use your favorite one.  Mine's pretty simple.

You can also use the following safer progression.

1-1; 1-2; 1-1; 2-1
2-2; 2-3; 2-2; 3-2
3-3; 3-4; 3-3; 4-3
4-4; 4-5; 4-4; 5-4
5-5; 5-6; 5-5; 6-5
etc...

I know that some of you will pooh pooh this progression. 

Too bad for you.

GLC

[Stepkevh]

so if i understand it correctly then if we need to bet 2-1 we bet 2u on the last fallen dozen and 1u on the one before the last fallen one, and in prog. 3-4 we bet 4u on the last fallen dozen and 3u on the one before the last.

[Ralph]

Betting 2 doz is usually not better than an bet on one. You cover about 2/3 which make more winning spins, but the fact you lose two or win one, and on high progressions get a few zeros, I have seen  players progress 1,3,9,81,...table limit. Just a few loss in a row and a few zeros, makes it  completely out of hands.
So a softer progression which sometimes need more than one hit to go plus, is a good way to go.
You hit more often, and do not need to go plus every hit, because of the expense of the progression.


I have tested a similar way, add  one on both doz. That do not get the progression out of hand during some bad spins, this is even more conservative, so I guess it is slow losing and slow winning.

I will test it in play when I got the time.
I must remind slower progressions do not always means you can go with a smaller bankroll.

The bet selection I use to play if I go for a 2/3 betting is to bet on the two last shown, which will make winnings if a doz or col sleep for long time, you switch automatic to the repeating.
You get trouble sometimes then the outcomes jump around.

[GLC]

so if i understand it correctly then if we need to bet 2-1 we bet 2u on the last fallen dozen and 1u on the one before the last fallen one, and in prog. 3-4 we bet 4u on the last fallen dozen and 3u on the one before the last.

You always bet the 1st number on the last fallen dozen and the 2nd number on the next to the last fallen dozen.  That's how I described it.  There is no correct way.  You can do it however you wish.  No odds change.

I'm not one of those people who try to say that if you do it differently than I describe you will lose.  Those guys are a little too infatuated with themselves.  Any method will win during favorable spin sequences and lose during unfavorable spin sequences.

GLC

[jarabo002]

Hi

I am triying something similar choosing two dozens during all the game (I don't belive in bet selections) with this progression:

1-1 1-2
2-2 2-3
3-3 3-4
4-4 4-5
5-5 5-6
......etc

Sometimes, in the case of two diferent bets in each dozen, if hit the one with the smalest amounth in the case of two different bets, i repeat the last stake until hit the dozen with 0 units or the dozen with the maximum units.

Its a nice progresion.

[GLC]

Hi

I am triying something similar choosing two dozens during all the game (I don't belive in bet selections) with this progression:

1-1 1-2
2-2 2-3
3-3 3-4
4-4 4-5
5-5 5-6
......etc

Sometimes, in the case of two diferent bets in each dozen, if hit the one with the smalest amounth in the case of two different bets, i repeat the last stake until hit the dozen with 0 units or the dozen with the maximum units.

Its a nice progresion.

It's for sure no worse than other progressions.