• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

A question for all....

Started by keel44, Nov 21, 04:52 AM 2013

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

keel44

Let me bounce this idea off people in this forum. 

Let's assume we are betting the even chances.  We know that flat betting won't work in the long run. I would say, however,  that sometimes flat betting works within a certain amount of spins.  You could walk up to the table and start winning right off the bat.  You could also walk up and start losing right away.  Of course the number of times you would walk up to the table and start losing right away would be a little bit more than the winning scenarios.

I say all that because I want you to think in terms of how many opportunities will it take to start a winning trend.  Imagine betting the minimum amount until a certain point.  Then you raise your stakes, and you keep betting those raised stakes, as long as you are in the positive or break even within those spins at the higher stakes.   As soon as you are in the negative while betting the higher amount, you drop back down to the absolute minimum.  In effect, it will cost you 1 high unit to see if right now is a positive situation and to ride throughout the positive trend.

Basically you keep betting into the positive trend and you bail at the very first sign of negativity with your balance.  So that means you must win that very first spin at your increased stake in order to keep going.

I have devised a strategy with specific rules around this theory.  I posted it a while ago, I have not received much interest.  I have been winning with it, but only with pretend money and visual checks.  My question to all is:  What do you think of the theory I purpose?  Can this be profitable?


My strategy:
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13367.msg115369#msg115369

vladir

I'd say to answer that question, just put it on billions of spins and see the result ... We can do that with excel, but I don't have much time to do it... But someone around here may do it if they see the topic... Some topics just pass by under the radar... Too much information this days...

Anyway, thanks for sharing your strategy, I still need to take a look at it... when I have more time :(
"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

beretta28

Your approach is original,but I'm afraid it doesn't work.
All progressions are very good or very bad,it depends on the permanences and on the variances they have to fight against.
In other words no progression wins all the time and no progression loses all the time.

keel44

I don't know if you could call my strategy a progression exactly, but you do have to raise bets.  It is more about when you get in and out of the higher unit amount.  The way I got it set up, you only raise a bet within a positive field and it only costs you 1 higher unit to find out.

Proofreaders2000

What about zero?  This system may work with Baccarat...maybe En Prison Roulette.

-