Lanky's Six Point Divisor for Double Dozens/Columns

[ausguy]

B28 - That's probably why it's not used these days & BR gone ? With the 6 point plan having it's origins in horse racing in the 1930's (as Lanky once mentioned) & it wasn't a winner then & it sure ain't a winner now, otherwise everybody would be on to it.

Then when you think about it, if it was successful, track betting would have gone bust decades ago. Just like if someone finds the grail it will kill casinos.

[Asxetos]

I think that we have to study much more the "bet selection" starting from the two following points(I have already tested all the others and I failed!!):
-unbalance is much more frequent than equilibrium
-next spin is unpredictable,but next spins(how many?) are related to previous spins.
I used to play a system based on the more probable unbalance in 25 spins(it's 5, between 2 even chances) or,bette but boring, in 100 spins(it's 10).
Of course you have to determine when you start and stop betting.

Beretta28 after a lot of years studying roulette ,everything led me to agree with your opinion 

[Nathanael]

I'm sure it is with luck, but I have always managed to get back to positive using safety brake to keep bets from going too big.

If you use a method to keep your bet size manageable, then you will be grinding.  With a grinding method, you must pray for a heavy gathering of wins to pull you up.

If you let your bets grow unchecked, they will get very large.  With unchecked bet growth, you must pray for a heavy gathering of wins to pull you up.  Hmmmm?

Without heavy gathering of wins before going broke, same result?

Maybe I should just stay with slots.  Much less thinking.

[Asxetos]

With a grinding method, you must pray for a heavy gathering of wins to pull you up.

With unchecked bet growth, you must pray for a heavy gathering of wins to pull you up.  Hmmmm?

Without heavy gathering of wins before going broke, same result?

Yes but if we have a heavy gathering of wins , then we can also win flat betting.
It is supposed that progressions are made for making us having "new+" in the bank roll will less wins than losses...otherwise a flat betting can also do the job.

[Nathanael]

More wins than losses are not what I'm saying.  Haven't you seen systems sellers touting a negative progression method and showing how it can win with fewer wins than losses.  In essence what they do is start with a series of heavy losses followed by a series of heavy wins.  Even though the losses outnumber the wins, since we're increasing our bet size through the loss valley we will be betting larger bet sizes when in the mountain tops.  Final result is a positive balance with fewer wins than losses.  All negative progressions depend on this phenomenon to be successful.  Lucky for me, the mountain top experience has always finally come around.

Nate

[Asxetos]

I see what you mean.
Win-Loss ratio

[GLC]

Here's a little twist on this progression idea.

Start with 10/10  The result of the division is 1 so we bet 1 unit on both dozens.
If we lose, we add the number of units lost to the dividend, but we don't add or subtract anything to the divisor.
If we win, we subtract the amount won from the dividend, and we subtract 1 from the divisor, but only after two wins at the current divisor amount.  These wins don't have to be back to back..
To win 1 unit is our target.  Then reset.
This method puts a limit on how long an attack is.
If you have the guts and the bankroll, you can play until you reach +1.  This will happen for sure by the 20th win, but depending on how many losses you've had along the way, the last few bets can get pretty large.

So, we have 2 safety brake methods.
1.  When we get to a divisor of 3, and we haven't reached +1, we add 2 to the divisor and continue.

2.  If we happen to reach a small deficit, you decide what small is.  Let's say we have been as much as 30 or 40 units in the hole and we are getting down to a divisor of 4 or 5 and our unit sizes are pretty large and we have a couple of good hits bringing us quite a ways out of the hole, but not quite all the way.  Maybe we're at -8 units.  Rather than using a divisor of 4, we could look back up our win/loss line to when we were at about -8 on the way into the hole, and we could reset our dividend and divisor to the one on our way down.  This will usually be something like a dividend of 16 and a divisor of 8  which is much better than a dividend 34 and a divisor of 4.
What we're trying to do is reset the attack to an earlier stage before we went into a very bad loss to win ratio hoping that this time we will have a more favorable win to loss ratio. 
We can apply either of these safety brakes as often as the situation arises.

GLC

[rajucb12]

Thanks for share it. The massive quantity should proceed prior to the divisor for that split to become correct.therefore the readers must understand 12/9 = 1, thirty three.
The divisor, together with several very little modifications, such as security bust, is one of the very best progressions you'll find.