Due

[GLC]

--Just seen this George mate.Oh that was few years back,don't like even remember that...it was the real battle......and if didn't had enough bullets would be killed.Without bullets in this game
you can't win the battle...Agree ?

The Texans found that out at the battle of the Alamo!

[Ralph]

22 long is enough, as you get plenty fold against magnum45 for the same money. How powerful your bullets may be, and you miss, its better to have some left even if it is less power, the target is wounded, and you have a few more.

[GLC]

22 long is enough, as you get plenty fold against magnum45 for the same money. How powerful your bullets may be, and you miss, its better to have some left even if it is less power, the target is wounded, and you have a few more.

I think this means you agree with Flatino, Ralphie.

[GLC]

I was just working on this DUE idea and was re-reading this topic.

Darn, I miss Ralph!

Having said that, he and Flatino are right.  If you want to win at roulette using a progression, you better have plenty of bullets.  I can vouch for that.  I haven't thoroughly tested a promising system using a negative progression similar to D'Alembert yet that I didn't run into a series that required more than 1500 units if I played the drawdown out until I fully recovered.  Many times I've quit more than 1,000 units in the hole because I didn't have the time for the final battle.

The method I haven't fully tested enough is to set something like a 250 unit stop loss and test a system enough to determine that you can stay ahead of the losses.  I've had the most luck playing Full TrioPlay, but I know it's not bullet proof either.

I miss Ralphie's wisdom and matter-of-fact way of presenting his ideas.

I miss your input too, Ivo.  Although I understand why you only rarely venture a post.  Don't let us get too far into fantasy land without giving us a wake-up call.

GLC