Advantage play

[ignatus]

starting bet;

4u on doublestreet 4/9, 16/21, 28/33
1u on numbers 1, 3, 10, 12, 13, 15, 22, 24, 25, 27, 34, 36

the doublestreets will give the money back (no profit)

loss can only occur when one of the seven unbet numbers hit

for each loss double bet

reset when you reach a new high, (two hits is usually enough).

that's it.

[ignatus]

OK, another progression may reduce risk : +1u on single numbers, +4 on the ds for each loss -reset when reach a new high-

[buffalowizard]

Where's the "advantage"?

[ignatus]

Where's the "advantage"?

from further testing it failed and the new progression didn't work either. sry about that. i will test my systems more before posting them, and not post in the main board

i can't make this system work ...as i have critizism suggesting martingale. short term it works very well, but it can fail pretty bad at any moment.

[Lee]

The main problem with the bet is it takes 24 units and leaves 7 numbers uncovered.

If you have 24u you would be better off playing a 2 doz method at 1 unit and raise on a win, no progression.

Work out a solid bet selection on two doz and bet 1u. Go to 2u on a win, 2u after the second win, then back to 1u. Once you make a 20u profit raise the base bet, ex 2,2,4. At each profit level, perhaps 30u then 50u, keep raising your base bets and increases and only increase your bets after you win, not when you lose.

With a solid bet selection there is no reason why you can't hit your bet 3 times in a row most of the time on the dozens. Progressions are second in importance to a bet selection. I'm not anti-progression, I use them, but any bet selection that relies heavily on a marty or 1,3,9,27 is no good in the long run.

Just my opinion...

Entire books have been written on Roulette and everyone has an opinion. Like you said, TEST TEST TEST, you will find it if you practice long enough.