• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

1 Dozen + 1Column

Started by vladir, Oct 14, 07:20 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

vladir

I think I haven't seen this approach anywhere yet... This is just an idea with staking plan, but I'm not sure about a bet selection, if there is one that is effective at all (we just need 1 hit every 7 spins to keep playing...).

So, the idea is to bet 1 dozen+ 1 column. We this, we will cover 20 numbers, of wich 4 will always give us a big win, and 16 will reset our progression (withouth any proffit at all).
Here is the progression for 7 steps (it gets a bit scary at the end, but if you are lucky to hit one of the 4 numbers, you prize will be 3 times the bet of the level you are at (so a win on the 4 numbers on the last lvl it wil be 3 *486 = 1458 )) :

1-1
2-2
6-6
18-18
54-54
162-162
486-486

Anytime we have a hit in one of our numbers, we restart from 1-1 (because we recovered the investment in all previous bets).
Total BR required: 1458 units.

Unless you have a very good betselection for this (one that ensures 1 win every 7 spins!), be warned that you will lose with this system!

Any ideas to improve this idea? Any betselection ideas?
"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

wyldegibson

Goodness gracious Vladir! This is clearly not playable. When you think about it there is only a 4/37 chance of winning and yet you only break even on 20/37 and lose outright on 13/37. You may stay in the gane breaking even for awhile but I could easily lose the 1st time trying this. Your chances of losing are more than three times greater and its only a 7 step marti? Nothing against you at all and I have much respect but people suggesting marti shoukd just stop. I guess if French suicides aren't enough to persuade you though than nothing will...

vladir

Quote from: wyldegibson on Oct 14, 08:03 PM 2014
Goodness gracious Vladir! This is clearly not playable. When you think about it there is only a 4/37 chance of winning and yet you only break even on 20/37 and lose outright on 13/37. You may stay in the gane breaking even for awhile but I could easily lose the 1st time trying this. Your chances of losing are more than three times greater and its only a 7 step marti? Nothing against you at all and I have much respect but people suggesting marti shoukd just stop. I guess if French suicides aren't enough to persuade you though than nothing will...

You are correct, but I guess you din't read to the end did you? I'm not advocating martingale suicide, I already told it's certainly a losing system - unless you have a way to ensure 1 hit in 7 spins.
"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

wyldegibson

I did see what you said but there is no way to ensure not losing 7 in a row on even chances and it happens all the time. Not losing more than 7 spins on a 4/37 chance of winning is not a strategy that anyone would be crazy wnough to use. I can't think of any kind of bet selection that is gonna hedge those kind of odds that are against us.

-