Differential Betting ECs

[Hermes]

GLC the P2 is the Hollandish system to counteract if opposite formations build up but I cannot figure it out how they apply it?
It is played by one person and it is played only the difference between R/B (or E/O, L/H) what save lot of money when zero strikes.
Every even game is build on escarts and balance (waves). This system is for escarts with medicated strategy when balance hurts a little the play.
Hermes

[GLC]

Okay Hermes,  We now know the bet progression both P1 and P2 use,  I guess the only thing left to do is see if we can use those to fill in empty chart that gives us the totals and the spins.  I tried it with the bet progressions we know now and I don't get anywhere close to the totals they do.

[Hermes]

We have to be careful the owner is a fox. He could put a wrong results to delude us?
Hermes

[iggiv]

guys. Stop and think for a moment. how any progression can give u the right bet? it is random.
the ball doesn't know on which EC u put your progressive bet. It can be a streak, it can be choppy, whatever. How the progression will tell u what to bet? it is like randomly putting some numbers of chips on red and black.

i think this cat the system "creator" just tricks u into thinking he is very smart. i think he is just as smart as mr. Dony the Millionaire. Whoever has a higher price and more buyers is the smartest.

that's my personal humble opinion about it.

[Hermes]

I like your optimism iggi. I would like to be so optimistic like you. You are my black knight fighting the demons.
Hermes

[MAX]

Hermes

Thanks for sharing very interesting.

Regards
Max

[monaco]

on all 3 ec's this is almost impossible to track manually in the time between spins.. 2 seperate & different progressions running on all 6 ec places, then the differential between the progressions on 1 ec, differentially played against the differential between the 2 progressions on the opposite ec??

there might be something in running it only on 1 ec, i tried it briefly but even that wasn't returning great results. 

i might give it another go though, as there is something intriguing about it & I've seen the basic idea mentioned in other works.

anybody else ever had a go?

[Hermes]

I agree, you can bet just 1 EC eg. R/B this way but you have to chose between 2 styles of game escarts or balance. Sometimes is better to play escarts and sometimes balance.  We need some barometer (indicator) which tells us what trend is in play and copy that trend like at Forex trading.
Hermes

[Bockstaele]

It is easy. Sorry, but i now see this topic and maybe it is too late and you know the answer. The idea is that you play on black and on red in same spin. You start with one 1 $ on each. Then when one win you add 1 $ to the bet on this color, which came, when you lose on some color next spin you take 1$ from the bet of this color. Minimal bet is 1 $. And probably when you have to bet 1 $ on black and 2 $ on red you just bet the differens so in this case you only bet 1 $ on red. Hope it is clear enough.

[GLC]

It is easy. Sorry, but i now see this topic and maybe it is too late and you know the answer. The idea is that you play on black and on red in same spin. You start with one 1 $ on each. Then when one win you add 1 $ to the bet on this color, which came, when you lose on some color next spin you take 1$ from the bet of this color. Minimal bet is 1 $. And probably when you have to bet 1 $ on black and 2 $ on red you just bet the differens so in this case you only bet 1 $ on red. Hope it is clear enough.

Bockstaele,  What you have described, and quite clearly I might add, is how to bet differentially.  It's the basis for IBOBA'S Bullet Proof system and

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13392.0

is in fact an excellent betting method, but I'm not sure it's the essence of CONQUEST.  Do you have some inside information to support your suggestion?

By the way, welcome to the forum.

GLC

[Bockstaele]

GLC, thank you and you are right. The system, which i explain is only part of all. This system is used to determine bets for P1 column on both sides(black and red). There is another system used in same time to determine bets in P2 column. I can't find  rules of the system at first glance. Some rules to increase the bet with 1 and at some point go from the start, from 1. So you have two systems, which determine two bets for any spin for both colors. This are the bets in columns P1 and P2 then you have column Diff, which is made from difference betwen P1 and P2 for the black and the same on the other side for the red. So when you have Diff columns you compare and if there is a difference betwen them then this is the real bet. There is a mistake in the table. Here what they say - Here the first bet is placed on Red on SPIN 3, the bet is lost and the TOTAL is -2. Ok, but the Total for spin 3 is 0 in the table. It has to be -1. Cant lose and the Total to stay 0. It is -1. Then the next is spin 4 for which you have by the systems determined Diff columns and from this the bet is 1 on black. Came red ant the Total is -2. Ignor the signs +/- in Deff columns, just numbers. On spin 5 in both Deff columns is 2 so there is no bet at spin 5 ant Total stay -2. Spin 6 the Deff column for black is 2 for red is 0 so the bet is 2 on black, but spin 6 is red so it lose and the Total now is -4. And so on. This make any sence?

[GLC]

I looked at this at great length when the original post was made.  I just don't think there's enough details given to be able to determine the exact method.

In the final analysis, this system has losing sessions as do all systems.  Nothing but luck will keep it a winner in the long run.

I have at least 100 roulette systems and most of them are touted to be long term winners by their authors.  All of them lose eventually.

I've come to the conclusion that if you're going to play a system with a progression, you better have as large a bank as you can afford and be willing to risk it all if need be to stay ahead of the run from he!!.  And even then you may not have enough units, so that's why we shouldn't play with money we can't afford to lose. 

The other option is to take your large bank and divide it into 10 smaller banks and play each session until you either win or lose a bank.  If you can't stay ahead with 10 trips to the casino, your system is a long term loser and you better enjoy playing roulette because that's all you'll have to look forward to.

Money management, self-control and patience are paramount in this game!

[RouletteGhost]

differential betting ECs, something here? or was hermes smoking the good stuff?

whatchya think