• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

A very clever and extreme method - even money bets.

Started by ego, Dec 11, 02:29 PM 2013

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

NextYear


ego


Well i test the excel sheet and once i won 22 session and once i won 136 sessions.
But i belive that is only variance and fluctation and that the probability is still 1 in 64 even if the odds is 98.5%.
I Think that gap methodology would produce better results where you would bet against back to back with 98.5% probability.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-