roulette strategy

[glen108]

ok I don't know if someone has thought of this or not, but a cheap strategy that only takes three betting units and gives u a 70% (US) 75% (euro) win rate is by betting 2 units on the 1-18 and 1 unit on 25-36. Of course if u land on 25-36 it's a push and 1-18 u win 1 betting unit. Although if u lose two or three time in a row, your bets can get pretty expensive. It's just a thought, what do you guys think?

[Proofreaders2000]

If you could somehow move that unhit doublestreet to the
least hit of the six, you may have a stronger system imo.

Example: 31,0,21,10,5,27 (newest spin-value)

L13-18 is the coldest (not listed) of the six
doublestreets, so a chip on all the others.

[Thanatos]

ok I don't know if someone has thought of this or not, but a cheap strategy that only takes three betting units and gives u a 70% (US) 75% (euro) win rate is by betting 2 units on the 1-18 and 1 unit on 25-36. Of course if u land on 25-36 it's a push and 1-18 u win 1 betting unit. Although if u lose two or three time in a row, your bets can get pretty expensive. It's just a thought, what do you guys think?

Funny you should mention the 2x unit on half (1-18) + 1x unit on dozen (25-36) as ive got the 81% cover bets going thru my head for weeks and pretty much has come to the conclusion that this one is the optimal continual use bet. Even though its competing in my mind with the cheaper 1 on half and 1 on dozen.

Now playing 81% coverage isnt something for everybody as it quite clearly requires a lot of patience & control. Most people probably also gave up playing this high a procentage because of either the grinding-ness or disliking having to step into higher (dangerous) betting territory.

With the 81% bets i mean ive looked at the 30/37 (EU) & 30/38 (US 79%) number covering bets. Aka covering a half+ a dozen or 5 Lines or 3 lines + 3 quads or any other combination that covers roughly 81% of the numbers. So the idea was to look at the different possible ways of playing this positive high coverage while trying find the best bet size vs potential win vs breakeven .. continually .. and having recovery in mind too.

Like betting 1x unit on 5 lines is kinda pointless really playing continually. Its 5 small steps forward only to take one large 5 foot step backward. I'll skip straight to the 3 bets i ended up with.

1x unit on a half + 1 unit on a dozen: aka 12x on outside bet "19-36" and 12x on Dozen "1-12". Or the same as if using 5 lines with 3 3 3 4 4. Really like this one as its only 2x expensive softening the "blow" of a loss & making a recovery faster. Sadly only has that 12/37 potential win rate but its still big enough for my playstyle (paroli) & with the 81% "at least break even" rate it you only need to wait for a couple of wins on a row. I mean you put down 2x 100 units and 2 spins later you have 450 units potential. Of cause you can get long dull streak of the dozen not hitting. This is also why the next bet is probably better aka ->

2x unit on a half + 1 unit on a dozen: aka 12x on outside bet "1-18" and 6x on Dozen "25-36". Or the same as if using 5 lines with 4 4 4 3 3. Probably the best one as even though its 3 units expensive on a loss (Its actually also worse with paroli rules), but as the 18/37 potential winrate is larger i think (yes, just my opinion) that its overall better in the short time (before i start "regressing/brace for impact")

5 Lines bet 10 5 5 5 5: now i hear you say "eeww you gonna lose if the dozen goes cold". Then you probably dont want me to mention that i suggest Martingale for this one too This one probably shouldnt be played without keeping score of the hottness of the lines, i admit that. In general its a good thing to do (that is also why i listed the "line" bets in the 2 other bets above). Of cause as always i may be overthink it & it is possible just keep any eye on the middel dozen in the other bets.
This bet has the potential to double up on a single win. Like if you are playing towards "when a single line streaks" aka always covering the last spun line with 10 units so when you do hit the same line 2 or more times for a good win. With the 81% cover you shouldnt really loose often so the Martingale dont really jump up as scarily as had it been EC betting. I mean perhaps you loose 3 times in 15 spins but then that single win (and potential more) recovers it. Of cause if you loose rapidly make sure to stop. Again this one can be tough to handle as you have to juggle both "coldest" & "hottest" line & everything in one go.

Playing the two "half+ a dozen": All kinda ways you can play this from flatbet to regression etc. Ive played paroli aka rougly starting with 10% of bankroll then bet for the first 5 spins (breakevens or wins). From the 6th spin regress/brace down from the initial starting bet. Example: 10 10 initial (half+ a dozen) spin 1: even, spin 2: win (so next bet is 15 15), spin 3: win (next bet 23 23), spin 4: even, spin 5: even (next bet 5 5), spin 6: win (next bet 3 3), spin 7: even (next bet 1 1), spin 8: loss. On a loss i usual skip at least 1 spin and resets back to initial start bet. Not that this is set in stone or anything- Also if you get like a 20 spins without a loss i dont just stop at 1 1 but may paroli back up or mini half reset again etc.

Determining the "cold" line: if you dont keep track of the lines, then the old advice of always covering the last hit line in 2nd dozen. Probably as this catches both  repeats of single numbers & numbers getting hot. Also getting a "killer" line 3 & 4 switching pattern like 13, 21, 15, 24, 16, 23 seems really rare, but should be kept in mind if starting to form.

Hot Zero & going beyond the 81%: Sadly if zero goes super hot you cant cover it any other way than putting a extra bet on 0/00. Thankfully, if you have the option for smaller units then it really dont hurt much putting a single unit on 0/00 when your normal bet is like 20 20 or 30 15. Sure it can nibble a bit of future win, but its usual so tiny so it dosnt matter & you can even speculate putting extra unit(s) on uncovered numbers so losses dont hit so hard.

Oh and as always only play with cash you can afford to loose, especially with something as dangerous as this (potential loss streaks is super nasty).