The Chevy Chase

[buffalowizard]

Thanks to a lil inspiration from Rouletteman, Happy new year!

More often than not, you will get 4 DS hit out of 6. Therefore,

Wait for 3 unique DS's

And then bet the other 3 remaining unhit DS's for 3 spins.

Example:

6
6
5
6
4  <trigger because 3 unique DS have now hit in a row (5,6,4) Bet 123
4
2 win

Etc.

I have done tests of 12 sets of 100 spins. Here are my results, by simply using the 1,2,4 progression. If this progression loses, then just reset and start again with the 1,2,4

1) +3
2) +2
3) +7
4) +10
5) +10
6) +9
7) +1
-7
9) +2
10) -6
11) +10
12) +8

Not bad just betting 1,2,4. You can see how each session went by studying the wins and losses. No losses of the 124 prog. in 100 spins will gain you around 9 or 10 units.
1 loss of the prog will gain you around 2 units, and 2 losses will lose you around 7 units.

The thing is, it seems to be either winning or only losing once much more often than anything else, so I think this is a very tight method played like this. I don't post many systems here anymore, as testing before posting usually wipes them out fairly quickly. However, I'll give this some more attention. It's so easy too.

So in 12 sessions, the amount of times there were no losses was 6.
The amount of times there was 1 loss was 4
And the amount of time there was 2 losses was 2.

This is a ratio that I like!

BW

[buffalowizard]

Here is a 13th set of 100 spins, so you can see how I go about it closely.

1
4
5   trigger (145) bet 236
3   win     +1
2
4
5  trigger
5  loss
1  win   +2
1
2
4   trigger
3   win   +3
1
4
1
4
5   trigger
1   loss
3   win   +4
5
1
2    trigger
3    win     +5
2
3
3
6
2     trigger
6     loss
2     loss
6     loss      -2
2
4
1    trigger
3    win     -1
5
4
3    trigger
3    loss
2    win    0
6
4
3     trigger
6    loss
1    win   +1
5
6
6
3
2     trigger
5    win     +2
5
2
1     trigger
3     win    +3
3
2
3
5     trigger
2    loss
4     win   +4
4
3
3
4
3
4
3
4
2     trigger
5    win    +5
4
6
1     trigger
1    loss
1    loss
3    win     +6
2
4
2
3     trigger
3    loss
3    loss
4    loss    -1
2
2
6
6
2
6
5      trigger
6     loss
3    win     0
4
5
6      trigger
4     loss
3     win      +1
5

END. This was a very interesting session, and the first time that I got 2 losses and still ended up in the plus, which is promising indeed!

[Bettingking]

Yes I use a similar variation to this but I don't bet if all three DS's cover all the low numbers or high numbers because I notice you can get a large string of low or high numbers which can cripple the marty system.
Perhaps because the bet selection is more random when not all L/H are covered and not concentrating on 1 side who knows!!

[mogul397]

I am attracted to the 124 bet. But I feel like it's deja vue all over again.

For one thing, what about picking up series on a rolling basis and not
wasting spins waiting for new data.

From there, I wonder about only accepting one loss in a series, and playing
the sequence after one loss a piece to avoid 3 in a row.?

Last time I went, last week, my session ended losing a 3 step marty.

[buffalowizard]

Thanks for your comments and ideas guys. This is still holding true - and my first 13 session results were based on sets of 50 spins, not 100!

So now, let's see if the results are the same with 100 per session.

I have tested another 7 sessions (700)

+16
-14
+1
+9
+1
+8
-8

Worth a look if you have the time, and never gets hairy. Biggest drawdown so far was -24

[tomi20]

Here are my results with progression 123

52 sessions , 50 spins per session , overall  result = 0

6
7
-15
-5
-7
8
1
2
8
-7
-4
9
-1
1
-7
4
-7
0
-1
-7
0
-5
-9
7
7
7
-2
-8
1
8
5
2
6
3
8
2
1
7
9
-7
0
6
2
-9
-7
-18
1
8
-10
-5
5