Randomer Thoughts

[NextYear]

Is it last that we heard from Falkor 

[falkor2k15]

Is it last that we heard from Falkor 

I got my son staying with me this weekend, so I need to take a break from Roulette for the time being... but I'll be back to share my newest jokes with you all. Remember: all systems lose in the end!

[falkor2k15]

php cannot work..

[NextYear]

You earn it! 

[falkor2k15]

Am I the only one studying this???  Where are all of Priyanka's other students? We need to all introduce ourselves and start a secret society or something. Is it just me alone who thinks the "all-seeing" eye of the providence is a bit suspicious - it's only in, like, every Hollywood movie ever made?  Man, if only you had seen what I've seen then you would also be a devoted student of Priyanka and would give up a 3 year university course to study this instead...


'Can you see anything?'
'Yes, wonderful things.”
― Howard Carter, Tomb of Tutankhamen

[MrJ]

 "Remember: all systems lose in the end" >> Falkor, this is only an observation, no arguing.

You made that comment but insist on following/studying with this Priyanka obsession you have. Not to mention, all of HIS stuff is system based. I'm confused.

Ken

[falkor2k15]

"Remember: all systems lose in the end" >> Falkor, this is only an observation, no arguing.

You made that comment but insist on following/studying with this Priyanka obsession you have. Not to mention, all of HIS stuff is system based. I'm confused.

Ken

How do you think you was born? By rights, you should still be star stuff...

I'm telling you, mates: Priyanka has random locked down with 100% predictability. It's beyond the greatest moments in fighting game history: link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=JzS96auqau0

Priyanka may not want to write a book - but he can sure read random like a book!! 

[falkor2k15]

Here's what stage I am at with Priyanka's PhDP course - still a long way to go with this syllabus.............

Cycles/PHP = 80%
Constants/Ratios = 80%
VdW = 60%
Events = 60%
Defining Element bias = 64%
Stitching Bets = 50%
Outer Cycles = 50%
Tracking for repeats on dozens or cycle lengths / increasing span of biased game = 30%
Order Element = 20%
Uniques / Birthday Paradox = 20%
Dozen Triplets = 10%
Longest Sleepers/Distances = 20%
Parallel Games = 10%
Creating a biased Game = 10%
Dispersion Surfing/Riding on imbalances = 10%
Creating Dependency = 10%
Creating own playing positions = 10%
Dead Runs/Dead Heats = 0%
Porrondo's Paradox = 0%
Theorem of Friends and Strangers = 0%

[Ponyboy]

Hi Falkor,

I am learning on AP. Can I ask you some simple questions here ? Example :

1) B B T B T B T
Do I bet for a B again although 1st AP of B already formed ?

2) BBB
Do I bet for a 4th B although 1st AP already formed ?

Hope you can advise, thanks !

Regards
Pony

[Ponyboy]

Hi Falkor,

I checked your example, the one which you said you put example, 2/1, 1/0 etc. I think some has got mistakes. when you put 2/0, it might be just 1/0.

I also tried to test this using some past spins, and it is not a winner. I am playing about nearly 30 numbers and it got -7 units.

Unless I am doing wrongly with the APs.

Regards
Pony

[falkor2k15]

I took the wiesbaden spin data from 1st January to 15th January and applied some of the concepts that has been discussed here in this thread and outside. I have removed zero from the equation. The results are attached. I have carefully removed one of the columns in the excel that aids in removing apples or pears ( ).  Those interested can study the excel.

Attached is how Priyanka placed bets for her (re-attached) spreadsheet - but starting from row 35 (and every so often) she places a dynamic bet that deviates from the mechanical way as what I simulated - so my bets are not exactly correct 100% (only 99% of the time). I think the main goal here is to adapt this strategy to play more like how Pri plays in her "Journey" videos. Anyway, I've synchronised the green spreadsheet almost precisely with the mechanical way, showing which dozens were actually selected 99% of the time. Any significance to the 1% of dynamic bets? Again, I think it's a far cry from the Journey vids, and here there are really not many betting opportunities available.



Note: row 34/35 was played differently by Priyanka to the usual way - but row 37-39 was played the same as the standard mechanical way.

[ati]

Hi Falkor, I believe your analysis is not correct. But it's been a while since I looked into this so I need some time to refresh my memory. Do you remember when I wrote that after cycle length 1 100% of the bets won, which cannot be real and I had no idea how? Well, later I realized that it's quite obvious. There is a column missing from the excel sheet, and that column is the parallel game.
The "Result at the end of cycle" column is not the results of the dozen cycles, but the two (or more) games combined. That's the reason the result is often zero. Also, we can only see the result at the end of the dozen cycles, and we cannot see what happened between them. It makes it very hard to decode. I had no luck and I gave up after a while.
I think the bets are on double dozens, like you'd normally play dozen cycles. The mystery is the other bet selection.

[falkor2k15]

Hi ati! But not all CL1 bets are won... and as I said: 95% of the above is based on the six states of dozens, i.e ordinality and cardinality, so I guess that's the column that's missing? However, it isn't profitable at all - but the journey videos could be a progression of this method?

[falkor2k15]

What does Row 35 tell us about the kind of bet that Pri placed here - OR the kind of bet that Pri didn't place here - not in line with 95% of the other bets? Something very peculiar about row 35 right here (and others like rows 175, 262, 280, 289 - and particularly 291) that gives the game away... can you see what it is??

[falkor2k15]

Email I received today:

"My name is Louis Pickthall, and I am a Broker with Uniregistry. I represent the current owner of randomthoughts.com

Uniregistry is a Domain Brokerage that help thousands of individuals just like yourself, purchase the best Domain Names on the market.
 
I was able to speak with my client and based on many criteria they have determined a value of 64,000.00 USD.

Could we arrange a call to discuss this opportunity further?"