Hot Spot

[psimoes]

No, i guess not (you have all my results, posted here) now, i could do MM like i did with "Hotzone" and win a 100 times, ....since it very rarely goes straight down to Stoploss before reaching some kind of "new high" or positive result, so you're right, check "Hotzone" if you like this kind of MM,..

I remember Hotzone very well. I don´t always agree with your methods, but that one had really good results.
The thing is: the lost session got my attention so you know, aiming for +1 unit per session everyday is one old goal. Never encountered a method that would guarantee such result.
With your drive, why not pursue it?

[ignatus]

I remember Hotzone very well. I don´t always agree with your methods, but that one had really good results.
The thing is: the lost session got my attention so you know, aiming for +1 unit per session everyday is one old goal. Never encountered a method that would guarantee such result.
With your drive, why not pursue it?

Sure, if you're a Highroller , that would be a great goal. Problem with playing with Highroller tactics, is (?) for this, and for Hotzone, you have to have a BR to cover up to the stoploss. (that would be 500u) OR ELSE you go for 3 spins, Hit or Lose.. i wouldn't dare to play highroller, 

Only think i want is a system with a pretty good hitrate/winrate, and (so far, this has been good), inspired from all the hotnumbers fans, -it's played same way as "hotzone" ....but i doubt it could profit Flatbet if you like you can try that, or else, join our testing-team, and perhaps, come with some tweaks/or- your idea, how you would play it?

Thanks

[psimoes]

Still running some tests on my own, regarding variance.
The linear chart in the wheel analysis menu is a great tool. Both hot and cold numbers tend no stay in their ranks for quite some time. We all know this, but it´s good to be able to see it.

[ignatus]

Winkel's fibbonacci progression seems a bit too steep.

IT'S *NOT* too steep, you wasted my time, because i did alot of testing with a milder progression,
1 1 1 1 1 1 | 2 2 2 2 2 2 | 3 3 3 3 3 3 | 4 4 4 4 4 4 | 5 5 5 5 5 5 |....etc (Well i won 9/10 or 8/10 sessions with it), BUT the losing session you can see (first chart)

SAME SPINS with The original winkel's fibonacci
1 1 1|2 2 2|3 3 3|5 5 5|8 8 8|13 13 13|21 21 21|34 34 34|55 55 55|89 89 89
(second chart)

So? I STILL play winkel's fibonacci  (BECAUSE, you go back 1 step in the progression-ladder at each win) it works perfectly fine with this kind of bet.

[ignatus]

I won't Re-run these tests but these were played with
1 1 1 1 1 1 | 2 2 2 2 2 2 | 3 3 3 3 3 3 | 4 4 4 4 4 4 | 5 5 5 5 5 5 |... progression (Just for demonstration...)

[kingmaq]

cool

[Roulettebeater]

Hi Ignatus,
I am new member, i liked your method.
Thank you

[boyd30]

Seem to works well with above progression to. Too steep was maybe wrong words, I would say you play with a lot of units with Winkel's progression but of course you need to find out what works best. I've been looking at "Hotzone" and that's also interesting. But that's another thread.

[ignatus]

Hi Ignatus,
I am new member, i liked your method.
Thank you

Great, 

Tracking this one may be little difficult, but it's not to hard if you've got RX,