something to exploit for winning always

[albalaha]

Dear all,
          We very seldom have serious discussions upon a real winning method. I was reading something and found an adage " change is the only constant". This made me think something. You can see there is no pattern or bet size which can let u win always. But you can see ball usually distract from the earlier spin, more often than not. Can we exploit this tendency? If yes, how? Here we can go for wheel based exploits and not table based. We have to find the most frequent gap between the first spin to the next one. It may be a five number selection or seven number or whatever. I am working on this constant tendency and soon will come out with something concrete. You may also help finding an event which occurs most frequently within two spins. We can later workout progressions etc.

[Fripper]

Nice post. I will follow this one, if I come up with something I let you now

[chrisbis]

What we need is a movement indicator system.

That is, say ball lands on 10 Black after a clockwise rotation of the wheel (anti-clock on the ball),
and the next movement is to 32 Red after a counter-clock wheel spin (clock on the ball)
then we can either by hand/mind or by a tracker, calculate the amount of movement to that postion, and give that answer a a coef number relative to the wheel.
So
[attachimg=#]

This would give an approximation to a 51% movement of the wheel in a plus direction,
which would say give us a factor coef of 0.51, and if we had seen that the ball had hit one of the disrupter's on its entrance to the inner wheel sockets, we could factor that in too.

Needs someone far cleverer than me to figure out a measurement system that could then be applied to the next spins, such that say, the next spin was given a factor of 35% rotation, (0.35 x a dispersion factor of 0.972) which that tell us the suggested rotation of the ball would be in the region of -(minus since the ball is going to travel counter clockwise) 0.36 of the wheel.

Would anyone like to expand on this theory, or tell me that work has been done on it before?

[albalaha]

If you keep in mind that wheel and ball's direction being alternated every spin, you can have better results.

[TwoCatSam]

Dear all,
           But you can see ball usually distract from the earlier spin, more often than not.  (My red.)

Does the red mean "more often than not"?

Sam

[VLS]

Good point Sam.

In my "roulette life" I have learned to say: "in my witnessed/studied samples"

Vic

[albalaha]

Dear Victor and twocatsam,
                      Do not forget that I am an attorney and use every word with utmost care. "Usually" indicates that sometime ball reaches same place also as the earlier one. Repeat of the same number or repeating a sector. Is it very "unusual" if I used the word "usually" ?

[albertojonas]

theres a good system on this subject
exploited by katilla.

another one on the vls forum by a guy named something like Know when to quit.

just my 2 cents...

[albalaha]

Scatter from earlier decision is the only consistant phenomenon in roulette. The question is how to benefit from it. Which bet selection and which progression can help us reach our goal of winning ultimately?

[Carlitos]

....... by the way...... have you all notice that the majority of even and uneven numbers are 2 pockets long on the wheel....? I think that 9 numbers are not 2 pockets long only 1. But the rest is 2 pockets long.....





Carlitos