Facts about Non-Random in 2019 and the cost of winning

[falkor2k15]

I don't think English was his first language, hence some spelling mistakes or minor problems with grammar.

I got the impression that rrbb/Priyanka were trying to mix combinatorics with probability and calling it non-random, when in fact they are completely different disciplines that have nothing to do with each other.

[Herby]

combinatorics -probability have nothing to do with each other

Basis of an understanding of probability  is a good understanding of combinatorics.   

[Drazen]

I don't think English was his first language, hence some spelling mistakes or minor problems with grammar.

I got the impression that rrbb/Priyanka were trying to mix combinatorics with probability and calling it non-random, when in fact they are completely different disciplines that have nothing to do with each other.

I think that crunching combinatorics and probabilties here ONLY, have nothing to do with finding what we are hoping for.

There must be more than it meets the eye.

[Taotie]

There must be more than it meets the eye.

Drazen, the only thing that meet's the eye around here is your avatar.

[mickavelli]

I don't think English was his first language, hence some spelling mistakes or minor problems with grammar.

Reddwarf -
"So: I'm looking for a strategy where we make the most money in the shorthest time with a reasonable change of winning.  The idea that I currently have is to combine bets:

a.  when playing even changes, it takes the longest to reach a certain goal.  The upside is that there is a high probability I will survive long enough
b.  when playing single numbers I have the largest odds

The goal is a certain amount of money.  Once reached we stop.

The idea is that the EC' are used to ensure that we either gain a lot (single number wins), or break even (EC)."


You may see problems with grammar mate, but i see hints!

[falkor2k15]

I heard about an EC + numbers strategy many times - perhaps by hedging bet - but it just doesn't work.

You can never guarantee a win or break even because when you hedge you always leave part of the board uncovered. Once that part of the board strikes several times in a row then you break the bank if you were chasing losses (or worse case you would still be in a serious negative from the additional risk via hedging).

There's no cutting an efficient bet either by parachuting from EC to numbers because of the independence between each spin, etc.

I have tested all different parallel streams in combination, and there's no avoiding negative expectation.

Not hints... just bible riddles...

[Kav]

What is cl1 cl2 cl3?

[stringbeanpc]

Kav, I think cl is an acronym for cycle length, hence cycle length 1, cycle length 2 & cycle length 3.

[Kav]

Thanks for the reply.
Now... if someone can answer what "cycle length 1, cycle length 2 & cycle length 3" really mean... and what they represent...

[falkor2k15]

Thanks for the reply.
Now... if someone can answer what "cycle length 1, cycle length 2 & cycle length 3" really mean... and what they represent...

[donik7777]

Somebody said look on sequences like on the subjects i.e. dozens/lines/streets etc.
We know each group has own repeat statistic/curve. Also we know in random game mostly repeat at low.
How we can convert these sequences to repeat probability and use them. These sequences also can give us imbalances which Pri and other masters many times repeated.
So some MLE will repeat more often and immediately then other