Prediction, Probability, & Progressions

[gizmotron2]

Prediction, Probability, & Progressions

Prediction is just as good as probability because neither one can tell you when a win streak will occur, how long it will last, and when it will end.

Progressions are worthless because you place your brain in a basket and never search for winning conditions. It's kind of like the French Revolution where your head is placed in a basket. You get killed.

You can predict with 100% certainty that a win streak will occur. You just don't know when. So instead of money management you need session management, SM. Reading Randomness is a method to tie trends and patterns to win streaks. They are tied to losing streaks too. They are tied to slow grind streaks, both up and down. The skill is in seeing these streaks and noticing what type they are.

The win or lose streaks are parallel information that you can associate, "tie," to trends or patterns that you use to make bet selections with. When the trends are working you are in a winning streak. It's that simple.

This requires an ability to tie them together. That skill comes with practice and experience.

You can't do this if your mind is in a basket. When you use a progression you get lazy or even completely apathetic to what is going on right in front of you.

So it is my opinion that predicting that a win streak will occur is a safe prediction. It's right up there with the sun will rise tomorrow.

Proof:

[Kairomancer]

As far as I understand reading randomness is a system based on pattern recognition.
Since past spins you analyzed in the pattern does not influence the future random spins you still have the odds 1:37 on your next bet.

You can verify this for yourself. Extraordinary claims justify extaordinary evidence.

Shove us the simulation that your selection method is better than random bets over 1M spins.

[gizmotron2]

As far as I understand reading randomness is a system based on pattern recognition.
Since past spins you analyzed in the pattern does not influence the future random spins you still have the odds 1:37 on your next bet.

You can verify this for yourself. Extraordinary claims justify extaordinary evidence.

Shove us the simulation that your selection method is better than random bets over 1M spins.

No thank you. I don't need to prove it to you. When it is no longer available, because the casinos ban it, then that will be my plan executed perfectly. I want you to get the proof you need when it is too late. I did it this way on purpose. This is being done this way to piss off the mathBoyz. A real mathematician would look at this and explain why it works mathematically. You can learn it to disprove it. I already did all the work. Nothing is stopping you from disproving it. This is way better than demanding that others go do something for them. Please do nothing. I dare you not to disprove it.

BTW: Prediction is no better than probability.

[nottophammer]

Shove us the simulation that your selection method is better than random bets over 1M spins.

A million spins; just do it over 60 spins. You're more likely play 60 spins or max in B+M 500.
So if you could win in 60 spins and do it all the time, you'll be on to something!!!

[gizmotron2]

A million spins; just do it over 60 spins. You're more likely play 60 spins or max in B+M 500.
So if you could win in 60 spins and do it all the time, you'll be on to something!!!

The only thing that kills this method is when you place your first bet after you see a good looking trend to bet on. If that bet losses then you have lost a first bet loss. So it is known as a first bet losses. If a swarm or a slow grind downward of first bet losses occurs then you will lose the session. It's rare to get killed by a swarm of first bet losses. First, you have to keep betting while you know you are in a losing section of the session. That's simple enough. Don't do that.

I tend to get my wins from sessions that last no longer than 100 spins or three hours on a busy table in a B&M. I virtual bet the first 10 spins just to see if I can see a trend or pattern. But those still take time. All this is demonstrated at the source.