Just Felt like it. cause its Bayes.

[chrisbis]

@Bayes........................................................Baize.?!
Felt image to follow.

Here a Typical CWB table felt layout. OK.

[attachimg=#1]

Here What happens if the result is say #2

[attachimg=#2]

Also I have shown it (Marque) landing on 3 and 27.

So original question was:-

Can U calculate how many  possible ocurrance there could be, if when a CWB is down, covering 8 splits, the results is next to one of the splits, as tho the result has landed 90* Degrees rotation from the desired outcome.

The idea is to be able to have a program, that can spot that 90* shift, and then would place the bets thus;- instead:-
[attachimg=#3]

[chrisbis]

Or similar movement.
Thanks for looking.

Just wanted to empty my brain, so I can load more sh1te in it, it was getting...............messy.

I'm a hoarder!!

Cheers J.

chrisbis

[Bayes]

Or similar movement.

That's a bit vague, but the chance of a particular split hitting is always 2/37. However, I don't think that's what you wanted to know. 

[chrisbis]

Changing/moving the split, is as U say open to so much scope.

But here are the facts

The table is covered by 8 split bets, which is 16/37 coverage.

The split bets in CWB all face down (longitudinally) the Table/felt/bayes

The possible movements for the result acting at 90* clock-wise or anti-clock wise, are dependant on where the CWB splits are located, but, for the split bets located in Column 1 or Column 2- they are single directional rotations, ie . can only go either 90* clock or 90* anti-clock.
whereas, CWB bets in the 2nd Column, the movement/rotation could be in either direction.
So for Column 1 say, movement possibilities per chip bet(The chip sitting on the Split) are, Number of splits in Column #C1x2x4+1 (for zero)

For Column 3 is the same as Column 1.

For Column 2, the movement possibilities per chip bet are, Number or splits in Column #C2x2x4x4+1 (for zero)

Am on the right wave length here for my calcs?

Cause I don't know how to work out the total number of possible movements, but maybe I need to know first, all the possible CWB split settings there are ?

[Bayes]

but maybe I need to know first, all the possible consistent winning bet split settings there are ?

I think so. When you know all the possible splits for your system then you should be able to work out the number of possible adjacent splits.  

BTW, why is your name a different colour? have you been promoted to some kind of mod?

[VLS]

by the way, why is your name a different colour? have you been promoted to some kind of mod?

1000+ posts!

[Bayes]

Ah, I see. A prolific poster award. 

Go Chris, Go!

[VLS]

Ah, I see. A prolific poster award. 

Go Chris, Go!

hehehe, should be "badges" but there you go!