• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I would like to know your opinion about favorites and imbalance!

Started by ego, Jan 02, 03:00 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego

I would like to know your opinion about favorites and imbalance!

As we all know that some things are very rare.
Example that all 37 numbers would have one show each during 37 spins.
That is a simple assumption and it means we get repeats, favorites or imbalance.

This apply to any kind of way you can think of or no matter what kind of patterns or formations or groups or spread of numbers you deal with.

Constant change and imbalance is two things that is just that - constant and common present at all times.

Once among many times when I speak with Laruance Scott about this via email.
He state and I agree - that find a way to take andvantage of that would be the same as have what many would call with the name The Holy Grail.

What we deal with is natural common fluctuation, which can come as short, medium or large waves and there should be no way to capture does on regular basis.
As then we again deal with the statement as nothing is due to happen - and note is not about 100 reds in a row - its about that a sequence no matter length or nature can never end to grow and repeat it self or be at sleep for ever.
No matter how we twist it - is just goes around and around and allways at some moment find its own way around what you are up against.

But at least - I reccon its better to put your money on what is constant present - which would be favorites and imbalance.

The beauty about this is - but have very littel to do about what i wrote above - is that if some one find a real defect on a wheel - then there will be a movement and natural physic cause towards why some numbers will be bias comparing to others  :)
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-