Homage to John Patrick

[Gizmotron]

The brilliance of John Patrick

It's not in his expertise of randomness or the fact that he follows, tracks, and uses trends to make bet selections. He searches for conditions that fit the situations that he likes best. He then begins to play in those favorable conditions. This should not be underestimated. What John Patrick gives you is far more important than that. It's how he is prepared to react to the play after it starts. He uses a "regression technique" combined with a method he calls "Up & Pull."

For Even Chance bets he plays a money management that goes like this:

Start your series at a unit value of 2.

After a win the regression step occurs. You place your next EC bet at 1.

After that you follow with wins and steps of 2, 3, 4, and 5.

John Patrick - "As you got into the flow of a winning series, you'd be constantly increasing your bet and still be pulling back a profit. Hence the term 'Up & Pull.' "

John Patrick doesn't have a Regression with an "Up & Pull" for double dozen / column bets.

So this is my tribute to him for betting two dozens or two columns, 24 numbers:

5 - 5
6 - 6 -- regression step here after win

4 - 4 -- +3 -- +15 if your reach this far and stop.
5 - 5 -- +5 -- +20 if your reach this far and stop.
7 - 7 -- +6 -- +27 if your reach this far and stop.
9 - 9 -- +9 -- +36 if your reach this far and stop.
10 - 10 -- +14 -- +44 if your reach this far and stop.

[Gizmotron]

It is a tremendous honor for me to have this section on this forum. Victor has proven that he and others intend to hold down the fort. I have been under attack for suggesting what works for me in other forums. It's not enough to see how randomness works. You must be able to use it as part of an over all strategy.

[Bayes]

I use a similar regression scheme as JP, not for staking on individual bets, but as a 'higher level' MM plan.

2,1,2,3,5

Each number is a weighting for the money you use in each session. So as an example suppose the minimum bet is $5 and a 'unit' represents 50 times the minimum stake, then the number 2 in the above progression list represents 2 ✕ 50 ✕ $5 = $500. I aim for 20% win or loss so if I win $100 in the first session I progress to the second step, meaning that the most I can lose is 20% of 1 ✕ 50 ✕ $5 = $50.

[warrior]

The brilliance of John Patrick

It's not in his expertise of randomness or the fact that he follows, tracks, and uses trends to make bet selections. He searches for conditions that fit the situations that he likes best. He then begins to play in those favorable conditions. This should not be underestimated. What John Patrick gives you is far more important than that. It's how he is prepared to react to the play after it starts. He uses a "regression technique" combined with a method he calls "Up & Pull."

For Even Chance bets he plays a money management that goes like this:

Start your series at a unit value of 2.

After a win the regression step occurs. You place your next EC bet at 1.

After that you follow with wins and steps of 2, 3, 4, and 5.

John Patrick - "As you got into the flow of a winning series, you'd be constantly increasing your bet and still be pulling back a profit. Hence the term 'Up & Pull.' "

John Patrick doesn't have a Regression with an "Up & Pull" for double dozen / column bets.

So this is my tribute to him for betting two dozens or two columns, 24 numbers:

5 - 5
6 - 6 -- regression step here after win

4 - 4 -- +3 -- +15 if your reach this far and stop.
5 - 5 -- +5 -- +20 if your reach this far and stop.
7 - 7 -- +6 -- +27 if your reach this far and stop.
9 - 9 -- +9 -- +36 if your reach this far and stop.
10 - 10 -- +14 -- +44 if your reach this far and stop.

here if you lose your just flat betting, only on a win the up and pull starts   correct?

[iggiv]

here if you lose your just flat betting, only on a win the up and pull starts   correct?

yes, u flatbet and if u lose 3-4 times in a row, your session is over. Up and pull works on win.
taking advantage of winning streaks