The Coin Flip Flaw :D

[incekt]

coin flip flaw

2 matrix? lol...

virtical double trigger...
bet doubles TO BECOME TRIPS...

maybe you don't even need a trigger... lol

marty 1,2,4,8,16,32 FTW!!!

LH
LH
LH
HL
HL
H0
LL
LH
LL
HH
HL
LL-trigger
LL-win
LL
HH
HL
L0-trigger
HH
HH
LH-lose -win
LH
HL-trigger
0L
HL-win
LH
LH
LH
HL
HL
LL-trigger
HH
LL
HH
HH
HH-win
LH
LL
HL-trigger
HL-win


feedback please? 

[incekt]

I feel anyways,,... it would take the same amount of power for randomness to spell your name out, as it would to make 10 vertical doubles in a row.... ?  

thanks to Tomla021 for saying in my last post "maybe it would make it more EVEN"

that is what gave me this idea... hopefully it works.... 

[albertojonas]

the more random is the bet the better...
anyway it looks as it as the same results as betting ftl, old, tbl or opposite.
this is the hype of matrix like and pattern systems.

looking forward to check on results.

Cheers,
AL

[incekt]

Yikes! I had 9 doubles in a row in testing this morning,...

new progreesion w/ recovery...

normal bet:        2 4 8 16 = $30    

wait for a trip to show... then get new trigger...

loss recovery:    10 20 40 80 = $150

total:  $180

[incekt]

been playing this system for the past 2 weeks
and have not lost with these new triggers and progression....

here it is...

after first double vertical trigger...
bet 2,4,8 that the next double verticals WILL
become Trips

if this fails... wait for another Double vertical trigger...
bet 16,32,64

if this fails... wait for another Double vertical trigger...
bet 128,256,512


i have never gone past a $16 bet.

[Maui13]

Hi there,

Live or RNG?

And your betting goes 3 steps deep, but do you bet straight after a loss on the next line?

Cheers,

[Halba1]

The more random is the bet the better...
anyway it looks as it as the same results as betting ftl, old, tbl or opposite.
this is the hype of matrix like and pattern systems.

looking forward to check on results.

Cheers,
AL

hello AL. i have been studying all the matrix systems. ultimately its all same even chance betting. you could do similar with straight black/red oscars grind. the reason is you get good strike rate, but bankrolled eventually.

[incekt]

did you try the system?

i play airball at my local casino and have never lost.

in all my thousands of recorded spins- this system has never lost.

i believe that the sequence would have to be so exact, for it to fail- the odds would be ridiculous


---- but maybe im wrong...

[Halba1]

did you try the system?

i play airball at my local casino and have never lost.

in all my thousands of recorded spins- this system has never lost.

i believe that the sequence would have to be so exact, for it to fail- the odds would be ridiculous


---- but maybe I'm wrong...

hi. i am interested. can you forward me an updated system, and 1 example on how to do it. i am not really clear on the vertical doubles and what im to look for.

[incekt]

Sure dude,,... Here is the new "revised system"

recording your favorite EC bets,...
(I record all 3 at once to make it go fast)

we use a very simple 2 wide matrix...

betting on Doubles TO become TRIPS vertically.
w/ a Double vertical being our trigger to start betting....

High and Low, for example...

HH
LL
HL
HL
L < here is our trigger,... the next
    double vertical to show we will
    bet that it WILL become a TRIP

so...

HH
LL
HL
HL
LH< trigger
HL
HH
LH< lost
LH< won

we are using a martingale (unless someone can think of a better progression... i am interested)

after the first trigger be will bet those Doubles to
become TRIPS.. betting 2,4,8.... if we loose those bets, we don't bet anymore until a Double veritcal does become a TRIP(or Quad or Fivepointy).

and then we start all over again - waiting for our Double vertical trigger and then betting 16,32,64

if that fails (and i have not seen it yet) bet 128, 256, 512

i would like to think i would have the balls to bet 512

[Halba1]

Sure dude,,... Here is the new "revised system"

recording your favorite EC bets,...
(I record all 3 at once to make it go fast)

we use a very simple 2 wide matrix...

betting on Doubles TO become TRIPS vertically.
w/ a Double vertical being our trigger to start betting....

High and Low, for example...

HH
LL
HL
HL
L < here is our trigger,... the next
    double vertical to show we will
    bet that it WILL become a TRIP

so...

HH
LL
HL
HL
LH< trigger
HL
HH
LH< lost
LH< won

we are using a martingale (unless someone can think of a better progression... I am interested)

after the first trigger be will bet those Doubles to
become TRIPS.. betting 2,4,8.... if we lose those bets, we don't bet anymore until a Double veritcal does become a TRIP(or Quad or Fivepointy).

and then we start all over again - waiting for our Double vertical trigger and then betting 16,32,64

if that fails (and i have not seen it yet) bet 128, 256, 512

i would like to think i would have the balls to bet 512

only possible at betvoyager with 1cents units. but you make money with 1c.


this is a good system. above in bold it shows three LLL vertical. so that is what we are waiting for correct.


it looks promising. 1,2,4,8,16,32 then cut your losses at 63 units and start over?


re: progression. there are slower progressions. available re: oscars grind. but ultimately its all the same as going martingale to 16-32 and starting over.

[incekt]

right,

however- 1c is nothing and time is money.... and RNG stands for RIGGED NONSENCE GAME. play at a real casino against randomness and not a biased computer program. 

[Johnlegend]

coin flip flaw

2 matrix? LoL...

virtical double trigger...
bet doubles TO BECOME TRIPS...

maybe you don't even need a trigger... LoL

marty 1,2,4,8,16,32 FTW!!!

LH
LH
LH
HL
HL
H0
LL
LH
LL
HH
HL
LL-trigger
LL-win
LL
HH
HL
L0-trigger
HH
HH
LH-lose -win
LH
HL-trigger
0L
HL-win
LH
LH
LH
HL
HL
LL-trigger
HH
LL
HH
HH
HH-win
LH
LL
HL-trigger
HL-win


feedback please? 

This is good Incekt. I am not sure about 2 wide. Three wide I have seen a few sets of 10 doubles before a treble said hello. The only question you and any prospective user of this method must ask yourself. Is do you want to take the risk of losing the wrong side of 500 units. When I can give you a sinilar level of success for 7 units??? I already know if for example I were to risk 500 units on PHASE 3 you would probably die before you lose. The same may be true of this. But convincing the newbie to risk those kind of munbers on EACH AND EVERY game they play. Is the problem.
TIME
INVINCIBILITY
RISK
Those are the three tenets of this game we are constantly wrestling with to perfect and fine tune as best as possible. What this week has shown me is sometimes something amazing can be right before you. Essentially PART of the very method you play. But you just cannot see it at the time. I have seen it. And the reason for my excitement is every method I have ever used including that fabulous CODE 4. Needs something to NOT HAPPEN. In order for you to succeed. In other words you trying to go against the tide of random. When the ultimate way to tame random, is to flow with it. Let it do the work for you.

[amk]

Hello JL,

Are you saying that perhaps CODE 4 could perform better if you bet that part of the 4rth pattern matches the first?.....
This approach was mentioned in the PATTERN BREAKER thread, for PATTERN BREAKER.....

Then PATTERN 4 was discovered with a greater strikerate.......

Look forward to your posts........

[incekt]

it's been awhile -    - I don't keep records like JL, but I'm still kicking ar*e with this one