• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

.

Started by ego, Sep 12, 11:02 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego

 
Balance and imbalance - repeats or no repeats - different states of the distribution.
Every game can be done with the comparison using a dice.

This is a grind method using fibo progression and one simpel bet selection.
Principal of 1/3 is a way to clustering the outcomes into groups of three.

1. RRR
2. RBR
3. RRB
4. RBB
5. BBB
6. BRB
7. BBR
8. RBB

Measuring the standard division regarding one side with out one show during 8 times.

1. A - 0.00
2. B - 0.13
3. C - 0.36
4. D - 0.69
5. E - 1.10
6. F - 1.59
7. G - 2.14
8. H - 2.75

1. If there exist a dice with 8 sides - then what is the probability that it alternating - that every side have one show each during 8 times ?

2. If there exist a dice with 8 sides - then what is the probability that the dice repeat one side 8 times ?


The odds of your next 8 throws showing #s 1-8, in any order, are: 40,320/16,772,216 (approx 1 in 416 chance)

Odds of the next 8 throws all being the same # are: 8/16,772,216 (approx 1 in 2.1 million) 

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

 
You write down the results in groups of three.

R
B
R

R
R
B

R
R
R

Follow the previous three and bet fictive with does (follow the same) with the three future ones.
You have 7 in 8 to hit one win within three attempts.

OR

Follow the previous three and bet opposite fictive with does with the three future ones.
You have 7 in 8 to hit one win within three attempts.

Trigger.
Wait until you have three loses and wait for a fictive win.
After that you attack once placing three bets.

Progression.
1 1  2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89
It is a step latter and if you end up at 8 you move down two steps and start from that position and continue to move down two step until you are at the beginning again.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

300 TRAILS WLWLWLLWWWWLWLW

1
1
1

2 1 L 
1 1 W   
2 1

1 2 L
2 1 L
2 2 W

2 1 L
2 2 W
1 2

2 2 W
2 2
2 1

2 2 W 
2 2
2 2

2 2 W 
1 2
1 2

1 2 L
1 1 W
1 1

1 1 W
1 1
2 1

2 1 L
1 1 W
1 2

2 2 W
1 1
1 1

1 2 L
1 1 W
2 1

1 1 W
2 1
1 2

1 1 W
1 2
1 1

1 1 W
1 1
2 1

1 1 W
1 1
1 2

2 1 L
2 1 L
1 1 W

1 2 L
1 2 L
1 1 W

2 1 L
2 1 L
1 1 W

2 2 W
1 2
1 1

2 2 W
2 1
1 1

2 2 W
2 2
1 1

2 2 W
1 2
1 1

1 2 L
2 1 L
2 1 L

2 1 L
2 2 W
1 2

2 2 W  W
1 2
2 1

1 2 L
1 1 W
2 2

1 1 W
1 1
1 2

2 1 L
2 1 L
1 1 W

2 2 W
1 2
1 1

1 2 L
2 1 L
2 1 L

2 1 L
1 2 L
2 2 W

1 2 L L
1 1 W W
2 2

2 1 L
2 1 L
2 2 W

2 2 W
1 2
2 2

1 2 L
2 1 L
1 2 L

2 1 L
1 2 L
1 1 W

1 2 L L
1 1 W W
2 1

2 1 L
2 1 L
2 2 W

1 2 L
2 2 W
1 2

1 1 W
2 2
1 1

1 1 W
2 2
2 1

1 1 W
2 2
2 2

1 1 W
2 2
1 2

2 1 L
2 2 W
2 1

2 2 W
2 2
2 2

1 2 L
2 2 W
1 2

2 1 L
2 2 W
1 1

1 2 L
1 2 L
2 1 L

1 1 W
2 1
1 2

2 1 L L
1 2 L L
1 1 W W

2 2 W
2 2
2 2

1 2 L
2 2 W
1 2

2 1 L
1 2 L
2 1 L

2 2 W
1 1
2 2

2 2 W W
1 1
1 2

1 2 L
2 1 L
2 1 L

2 1 L
2 2 W
1 2

2 2 W W
1 2
2 1

1 2 L
1 1 W
1 2

1 1 W
1 1
2 1

1 1 W
1 1
2 2

2 1 L
1 1 W
1 2

1 2 L
1 1 W
2 1

2 1 L
2 1 L
2 2 W

2 2 W
1 2
1 2

1 2 L
2 1 L
2 1 L

1 1 W
2 2
2 2

1 1 W W
1 2
1 2

1 1 W
1 1
1 1

2 1 L
2 1 L
1 1 W

2 2 W
2 2
1 1

1 2 L
1 2 L
2 1 L

1 1 W
2 1
2 2

2 1 L L
1 2 L L
2 2 W W

1 2 L
1 1 W
2 2

1 1 W
2 1
1 2

1 1 W
1 2
1 1

2 1 L
1 1 W
2 1

1 2 L
1 1 W
2 2

2 1 L
2 1 L
1 2 L

1 2 L
1 2 L
2 1 L

2 1 L
2 1 L
1 2 L

2 2 W
1 2
2 1

1 2 L L
1 1 W W
2 2

1 1 W
1 1
1 2

2 1 L
1 1 W
2 1

1 2 L
2 1 L
2 2 W

2 1 L
1 2 L
1 2 L

2 2 W
2 1
2 1

1 2 L L
2 2 W W
2 2

1 1 W
1 2
2 2

2 1 L
1 1 W
2 2

2 2 W
2 1
1 2

1 2 L
2 2 W
1 1

2 1 L
1 2 L
1 1 W

2 2 W
2 1
2 1

1 2 L
2 2 W
2 2

1 1 W
2 2
2 2

1 1 W
2 2
1 1
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

MAX

Thanks for sharing ,very interesting.

:thumbsup:
Regards
Max

Chrisbis

You know, I thought for a second that Twisteruk (Paul) had come back, and started a thread/competition, with the heading:-

"Who can start a Topic with the Shortest/Minimalist Title?"

U would win I think! He he.

Intestesting stuff, as always 'ego'.

And a very cool Title to Boot!!

there's is a joke I could insert here, as is my way, and I hope, would be taken in the spirit its intended! I'll use my secret hiding place!
[reveal]"Ego again![/reveal]

[reveal]As in the Phrase:- " Here we go again!".... or shortened... "'Ere' we go again!"[/reveal]
;D
Roulette..........................
Physical in Nature, Random in Opportunity                                                    The Reveal Originator!

ego

 
Ops find a very nice touch to this and reduce everything ...

As above but you wait for the first result after previos three.
If same as the first result of the previos three play twice oppisite.
If oppisite as the first result of previos three play twice same.
Each time after the trigger with a fictive win after two loses.

Due to this you don't play colours - you play does four formation that exist.
That become a dice with four sides.

1. XXX
2. XOX
3. XXO
4. OXX

This would be against repeats.
This is the STD.

1. A 0.00
2. B 0.25
3. C 0.69
4. D 1.27

With the following sample you can see a sequense of the following repeats.

1. A - 2 repeats
2. B - 4 repeats
3. C - 2 repeats
4. D - 0 reoeats

8 repeats is two cycels ...

This was 4 loses in a row ... LWLWWLLWWWWW LLLL WWWLW

1
2
2
2
1 L
2 W
2
2 W
2
2
2 L
1 W
1
1 L
1 W
1
2 W
1
1
1 W
2
1
2 W
2
1
1 W
2
2
2 L
2 W
1
2 W
2
2
2 W
2
1
2 W
1
2
1 L
1 W
2
1 L
2 W
2
1 L
1 W
2
2 W
2
1
1 L
1 L
2
2 L
2 L
1
2 W
2
1
2 L L
1 W W
1
2 L
2 W
1
1 W
2
1
1 L
1 W
2
1 W
1
1
1 W
2
2
1 W
1
1
1 W
2
2
1 W
2
2
2 W
2
2
1 W
1
2
1 L
1 L
1
2 L
2 L

2 W
2
2
2 L L
1 W W
2
2 L
1 L
2
1 W
2
1
1 W W
2
1
1 L
1 W
1
2 W
1
1
2 L
1 L
2
2 W
2
2
2 L L
2 L L
1
1 L
2 W
2
1 W W
2
1
2 L
1 L
2
2 W
1
2
1 W W
2
1
1 W
2
2
1 W
1
1
1 W
1
2
2 L
2 L
2
2 L
1 W
2
1 W W
2
2
1 L
1 W
1
1 W
2
1
1 L
2 L
2
1 W
2
2
2 W W
2
2
1 W
1
1
2 L
2 L
1
1 W
1
2
1 W W
2
2
1 L
2 L
1
1 W
1
1
1 L L
1 L L
2
2 L
2 L
2
2 L
2 L
2
1 W
1
2
1 L L
1 L L
2
2 W
1
2
1 W W
1
1
2 L
2 L
1
2 L
2 L
2
2 W
2
1
2 W W
1
2
1 L
1 W
2
2 W
2
2
2 L
2 L
1
1 L
2 W
2
1 W W
2
1
1 W
1
1
1 L
2 W
2
2 L
1 L
2
2 L
1 L
2
2 L
2 W
2
2 L L
1 W W
1
2 W
2
2
1 L
2 W
2
2 W
2
1
2 W
1
1
1 W
1
2
1 W
2
1
1 W
1
2
2 L
1 W
1
2 W
1
1
2 L
2 W
1
2 L
2 L
1
2 L
2 L
1
2 L
1 W


Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

 
Conclusion - never play against repeats using dice with four sides - run some more simulations and it tank big time.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

 
4 looking good using same rules as above ...

1
2
2
2

1
2 L
2 L
2 L

2
2 W
2
1

1
1 W
1
1

2
1 W
1
1

2
1 L
2 W
2

1
1 W
2
2

2
2 L
1 L
2 W

2
2 L
2 W
2

1
2 W
1
2

1
1 W
2
1

2
2 L
1 L
1 W

2
2 L
2 W
1

1
1 L
2 W
2

2
1 W
2
2

1
2 L
1 L
1 L

2
2 W
1
1

2
1 W
1
1

2
1 L
1 L
1 L

1
2 L
2 L
1 W

1
1 W
1
2

2
1 W
2
2

2
2 W
2
1

1
2 W
1
1

1
2 L
2 W
2

2
2 W
2
2

1
2 W
2
1

2
1 L
2 W
1

1
2 L
1 L
1 W

1
1 W
2
1

1
2 W
1
2

2
2 W
2
2

2
1 W
1
2

2
1 L
2 W
1

2
1 L
2 L
2 W

1
2 L
1 L
2 W

1
1 W
2
2

1
1 L
1 W
1

1
2 W
2
2

2
2 W
1
2

1
2 W
2
1

1
1 W
1
2

1
1 L
2 W
2

1
2 W
2
2

2
2 W
1
1

1
2 W
2
1

1
1 W
2
1

2
2 L
1 L
2 L

1
1 L
1 W
1

1
1 L
2 W
2

2
2 L
2 W
2

2
1 W
1
2

1
1 W
2
2

1
2 W
1
1

1
2 L
2 W
1

2
2 W
2
2

2
1 W
2
1

2
1 L
1 W
2

2
2 W
2
2

2
1 W
1
2

2
1 L
2 W
1

1
1 W
1
1

2
2 L
2 L
1 W

2
2 L
1 W
2

2
2 L
2 W
2

1
1 L
2 W
2

2
1 W
2
2

2
2 W
1
2

1
1 W
1
1

2
1 W
2
1

1
1 W
2
2

1
1 L
2 L
1 W

1
2 W
2
1

2
2 W
1
2

2
1 W
2
1
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-