"X"

[GLC]

This is just a different pattern than "The Reverse Slide".


I don't know why, but I've charted 3,000 spins and I can't find a loss.  Luck?  Maybe, maybe not.


1 2 2 1
3 1 1 2
2 1 1 3
1 3 2 1

That's the pattern.  An "X".  But it's a chunky X.


I think the reason it is so rare is because it must hit 8 out of 16 of the same dozen in order to win.


Aggressive method:  Once you have the same number in the upper right and upper left corners, bet against the rest of the "X" forming.  use 1-1; 3-3; 9-9; 27-27; 81-81; 243-243.


Normal method:  Once you have the 1st 3 locations formed, bet against the rest of the "X" forming.  Use 1-1; 3-3; 9-9; 27-27; 81-81.


Cautious method:  Once you have the 1st 4 locations formed, bet against the rest of the "X" forming.  Use 1-1; 3-3; 9-9; 27-27.


G

[GLC]

To get more betting opportunities, you can start on any line of the "X" and bet against it continuing to form.


3 2 1 2
2 1 1 3  Right here you can use the 1s in the 2nd and 3rd column as the beginning of the X
3 2 3 1  You would win on the 2 which blocked the 1


To lose this one you would have to have the following:


3 2 2 2
2 1 1 3
3 1 1 2
1 2 3 1
1 3 3 1

[warrior]

what's interesting is i was testing a different betting method in 4000 spins my x factor method lost once there is a definate pattern that does not come that often,i think everyone should check there results in their own methods for this .

[Juiced91]

Okay GLC/Warrior help me out here pls.
So we gonna spin 4 times:  1 2 2 1
now we have our begining line. Now do we spin once then bet on dozen 2/3 if lose dozen 2/3? then we spin agin.
so now we have 1 2 2 1
                           3 1 1 2
Now we spin once again to get startt the 2nd chunky part and then we start betting? Ive always been confused when to bet? Im assuming its one spin then bet as we wanna bet on spin 2 and 3 of the "X"?
If its confusing let me know.

[Juiced91]

Must we wait for the whole 16spins to pass before going again?

What i was doing was whenever spin 1 and 4 are the same we start the X.
I went through a hundred spins lots of wins never got past the first chunky part so always won in the second line.
Liking this GLC

[warrior]

Must we wait for the whole 16spins to pass before going again?

What i was doing was whenever spin 1 and 4 are the same we start the X.
I went through a hundred spins lots of wins never got past the first chunky part so always won in the second line.
Liking this GLC

Thats exactly what i was looking at you have it right.

[GLC]

Must we wait for the whole 16spins to pass before going again?

What i was doing was whenever spin 1 and 4 are the same we start the X.
I went through a hundred spins lots of wins never got past the first chunky part so always won in the second line.
Liking this GLC

No need to wait for the whole 16 spins to start over.  I don't think you should be betting on more than 1 pattern at a time, but if you have the bank, you can.

If I end an attack and I see that another one is forming, I will jump in betting against it continuing.

Even though my tests are showing this to be a good pattern to bet against, I know that it will form.  A loss is a big bite out of your winnings.  I'm going to work on a less aggressive bet method than the martingale.

Bayes always brings me back to reality.  Please read the following and keep it in mind when playing these dozen bets.
link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7087.msg66491;boardseen#new
Read reply #229.

Don't forget the definition of the word "gamble".

Up til now, all the systems I post are ways to gamble at roulette so that you have a very good chance to walk out with more money than you walked in with.  They are not guaranteed ways to win every time you go to the casino.

My brother used to go to the casino and throw away a couple hundred bucks every time.  Since he has been playing some of the systems we've come up with, now, most of the time he leaves with some of their money.  Not always and when he loses, it still hurts, but he's a lot of money ahead over the way he used to play.

That's my number 1 goal.  I'm still seeking my number 2 goal of staying way ahead of my losses with no chance for them to catch up.  I am ahead with a couple of systems, but it's too iffy for me to join JLs ranks of earning a living off the wheel.

Luck to all,

George

[warrior]

Has the x developed George?

[GLC]

Has the x developed George?

Warrior,

I got side tracked with other stuff and haven't spent much time with this one.  I've played a lot of sessions to +20 units and never lost.  I have been playing the aggressive progression of 1-1;3-3;9-9;27-27;81-81;243-243 which would be expected to win quite a lot before a loss.  I've actually never had to bet 81-81 yet.

My new awareness of myself makes me nervous that I might not be able to make a 243-243 units bet.  Especially if I were playing $10 units.  That would be $4,860 dollars on one spin of the wheel.  My hands would be shaking so much, I'd have chips flying all over the place.

I don't think it makes much sense for me to try to go beyond the 27-27 bet.  There will be more losses but they won't be so large.

I do think it's as good a bet as any of them.  Just not sure the best progression.  I've noticed that most of the time, I win on the first bet.  Could it win with a flat bet?

GLC