3 DOZENS and 3 COLUMNS ROUTINE- WORKING IN UNISON.

[chrisbis]

3 DOZENS and 3 COLUMNS ATTACKING IN UNISON.


This is the discuss section for the 3 Dozen/ 3Columns "Routine" sequence  I have been working on recently since fellow newbie member- jamesshoffner22162 posted up here his ideas and experience with a new Dozens bet using a purpose built Robot to make him good money every day (his claim, not mine, nor is it verified by James)

I'm trying to get to the bottom of how and why, this "Routine" sequence of his is working so well for him, with the limited amount of knowledge and information we have available here in the postings, and the conclusions that can be drawn.

Lets establish a few facts, subject to correction by James (and anyone else who would like to contribute)

• Type of casino played on- On-line RNG (Could be others)
• Method used- Automatic robot, places bets, and advances the progression
• Progression used- One made for the job by James
• How operated- Remote access, used to switch on and off, and to collect the days/weeks winnings
• Bank Roll requirement- approx- $3110
• Net winning estimated- $4k per day

And now to the pit falls, the means by which the cruel game of Roulette can fetch the straw walls of the machine room come tumbling down.

• Sleeping Dozens
• Running out of progression value, after the 30 levels available
• Several Zero's showing, will escalate the levels and value of each of the Dozens, whereas in theory, at least one of the Dozen bet stake value should be at 1, since one of the Dozen will always hit
• Software failure, Server failure, internet/phone link disruption
• Unless the "Routine" is rotated through say upto 12 different casino's, changing every day, the casino's in question could block the accounts
• This could all be a casino rouge
• Or it could be "The Bet"
• My Dozen/Column variant, could be a good option to reverse engineer the nuts and bolts of this sequence, to see why/if it works so well

Now to why and how the Routine sequence is operated.- To follow.

[chrisbis]

IN DEPTH STUDY.

1. THE PROGRESSION.

The progression can be found on the first post of James, but for those not familiar- here it is:-
1
1
2
3
4
6
9
14
21
31
47
70
105
158
237
355
533
799
1,199
1,798
2,697
4,046
6,069
9,103
13,655
20,482
30,723
46,085
69,127
103,691

These are unit values, so here's what they look like in Ã,£$E as pence/cents
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.06
0.09
0.14
0.21
0.31
0.47
0.70
1.05
1.58
2.37
3.55
5.33
7.99
11.99
17.98
26.97
40.46
60.69
91.03
136.55
204.82
307.23
460.85
691.27
1036.91

Now they don't look so scary do they, and although the upper limit at level 30 is still quite large (Over a grand in anyone's currency), is still manageable.

Need to examine now, why the values have been chosen, and they relate to the principle in play on the table- namely that there is a bet/stake amount on each and every Dozen.

No, not one dozen played, not even two, but all THREE.

He's a typical table from my testing Topic, showing all three Dozens bets at play:-

(note- * denotes spin result.......... columns are also showning the spin result)

[table=,]
bet,level,1st Doz,2nd Doz,3rd Doz,T$,#Spun,+/-,BR,bet,level,1st Col,2nd Col,3rd Col
0,-,0,0,0,0,-,-,1000,0,-,0,0,0
1,1,1,1*,1,3,#20,-,1000,1,1,-,-*,-
2,1,1,1*,1,3,#14,-,1000,2,1,-,-*,-
3,2,2,1,2*,5,#25,+1,1001,3,2,-*,-,-
4,3,3,2,1*,6,#35,-3,998,4,3,-,-*,-
5,4,4,3,1*,8,#32,-5,993,5,4,-,-*,-
6,6,6*,4,1,11,#8,+7,1000,6,6,-,-*,-
7,6,1,6*,2,9,#13,+9,1009,7,6,-*,-,-
8,3,2,1*,3,6,#22,-3,1006,8,3,-*,-,-
9,4,3,1,4,8,#19,-5,1001,9,4,-*,-,-
10,6,4,1,6,11,#32,+7,1008,10,6,-,-*,-
[/table]

At this junction, after ten bets/spins, the maximum value placed on the table is show at bet/spin 6. or 10.  total is 11 units (or Ã,£$E0.11)

So on a low value table, the risk is quite small.

And now to show the risk later on in the game after 30 bets/spins:-

[table=,]
bet/spin,level,1st Doz,2nd Doz,3rd Doz,T$,#Spun,+/-,BR,bet/spin,level,1st Col,2nd Col,3rd Col
0,-,0,0,0,0,-,-,1000,0,-,0,0,0
1,1,1,1*,1,3,#20,-,1000,1,1,-,-*,-
2,1,1,1*,1,3,#14,-,1000,2,1,-,-*,-
3,2,2,1,2*,5,#25,+1,1001,3,2,-*,-,-
4,3,3,2,1*,6,#35,-3,998,4,3,-,-*,-
5,4,4,3,1*,8,#32,-5,993,5,4,-,-*,-
6,6,6*,4,1,11,#8,+7,1000,6,6,-,-*,-
7,6,1,6*,2,9,#13,+9,1009,7,6,-*,-,-
8,3,2,1*,3,6,#22,-3,1006,8,3,-*,-,-
9,4,3,1*,4,8,#19,-5,1001,9,4,-*,-,-
10,6,4,1,6*,11,#32,+7,1008,10,6,-,-*,-
11,6,6,2*,1,9,#22,-3,1005,11,6,-*,-,-
12,9,9*,1,2,12,#5,+15,1020,12,9,-,-*,-
13,3,1*,2,3,6,#23,-3,1017,13,3,-,-*,-
14,4,1*,3,4,8,#9,-5,1012,14,4,-,-,-*   Awake.
15,6,1,4,6,11,#34,+7,1019,15,6,-*,-,-
16,6,2,6,1,9,#8,-3,1016,16,6,-,-*,-
17,9,1*,9,2,12,#8,-9,1007,17,9,-,-*,-
18,14,-,-,-*,18,#34,-15,992,18,14,1*,14,3
19,21,-,-*,-,26,#14,+37,1029,19,21,1,21*,4
20,6,-,-*,-,9,#18,+9,1038,20,6,2,1,6*
21,3,-,-*,-,6,#16,+3,1041,21,3,3*,2,1
22,3,1,3*,2,6,#13,+3,1044,22,3,-*,-,-
23,3,2,1,3*,6,#29,+3,1047,23,3,-,-*,-
24,3,3,2*,1,6,#23,-,1047,24,3,-,-*,-
25,4,4,1*,2,7,#15,-4,1043,25,4,-,-,-*
26,6,6*,1,3,10,#4,+8,1051,26,6,-*,-,-
27,4,1*,2,4,7,#11,-4,1047,27,4,-,-*,-
28,6,1,3,6*,10,#36,+8,1055,28,6,-,-,-*
29,4,2,4,1*,7,#33,-4,1051,29,4,-,-,-*
30,6,3,6,1,10,#3,-1,1050,30,6,-,-,-*
[/table]

Here after 19 bets/spins, the total table bet stake has risen to 26 units (or Ã,£$E0.26)

The progression is very close to a standard light  Fibonacci scheme:-
1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14,21,32 and so on.........

The main difference here, is that each of the Dozens will be subject to the progression, PLUS, one of the other Dozens will have a share, or retarded level of the progression, and the final Dozen should be at either 1, or at the most 2 if the casino has given U/the Marque, two consecutive Zero- Green Goblins spoilers.

Of course, likewise, the Zero influence, will have a direct bearing on the other Dozens, and increase their value along the progression list.

This is where sleeping Dozens after a showing of a couple of Zero's, could really make this "Routine" sequence work really hard in its recovery of the investment (value placed on each of the Dozens.)

[chrisbis]

WAGERING

Playing the 3 Dozens "Routine" progression, with or without the 3 Column variant, tends to cause the sessions Ur in to max-up the wagering amounts through Ur on-line account.

This could be a useful tool, when a player has to face an account bonus or free gift from the casino, that needs massive wagering volumes running thro the account.

In a moment I'll examine how much wagering is typically seen with this type of "Routine"(3 Dozens.

The variant of adding 3 Columns movement to the "Routine" will have no lesser or greater effect on the total amount wagered, since its the same amount of monetary value being used in each level of progression, its just either placed on the Dozens (all 3 dozen bet)
or, placed on the Columns (all 3 column bet)

From my notes before, he's the table of 30  Spielbank Wiesbaden table 2, spins.


[table=,]
bet/spin,level,1st Doz,2nd Doz,3rd Doz,T$,#Spun,+/-,BR,bet/spin,level,1st Col,2nd Col,3rd Col
0,-,0,0,0,0,-,-,1000,0,-,0,0,0
1,1,1,1*,1,3,#20,-,1000,1,1,-,-*,-
2,1,1,1*,1,3,#14,-,1000,2,1,-,-*,-
3,2,2,1,2*,5,#25,+1,1001,3,2,-*,-,-
4,3,3,2,1*,6,#35,-3,998,4,3,-,-*,-
5,4,4,3,1*,8,#32,-5,993,5,4,-,-*,-
6,6,6*,4,1,11,#8,+7,1000,6,6,-,-*,-
7,6,1,6*,2,9,#13,+9,1009,7,6,-*,-,-
8,3,2,1*,3,6,#22,-3,1006,8,3,-*,-,-
9,4,3,1*,4,8,#19,-5,1001,9,4,-*,-,-
10,6,4,1,6*,11,#32,+7,1008,10,6,-,-*,-
11,6,6,2*,1,9,#22,-3,1005,11,6,-*,-,-
12,9,9*,1,2,12,#5,+15,1020,12,9,-,-*,-
13,3,1*,2,3,6,#23,-3,1017,13,3,-,-*,-
14,4,1*,3,4,8,#9,-5,1012,14,4,-,-,-*   Awake.
15,6,1,4,6,11,#34,+7,1019,15,6,-*,-,-
16,6,2,6,1,9,#8,-3,1016,16,6,-,-*,-
17,9,1*,9,2,12,#8,-9,1007,17,9,-,-*,-
18,14,-,-,-*,18,#34,-15,992,18,14,1*,14,3
19,21,-,-*,-,26,#14,+37,1029,19,21,1,21*,4
20,6,-,-*,-,9,#18,+9,1038,20,6,2,1,6*
21,3,-,-*,-,6,#16,+3,1041,21,3,3*,2,1
22,3,1,3*,2,6,#13,+3,1044,22,3,-*,-,-
23,3,2,1,3*,6,#29,+3,1047,23,3,-,-*,-
24,3,3,2*,1,6,#23,-,1047,24,3,-,-*,-
25,4,4,1*,2,7,#15,-4,1043,25,4,-,-,-*
26,6,6*,1,3,10,#4,+8,1051,26,6,-*,-,-
27,4,1*,2,4,7,#11,-4,1047,27,4,-,-*,-
28,6,1,3,6*,10,#36,+8,1055,28,6,-,-,-*
29,4,2,4,1*,7,#33,-4,1051,29,4,-,-,-*
30,6,3,6,1,10,#3,-1,1050,30,6,-,-,-*
[/table]

Now we can add up the total amount Wagered (for each Dozen/Column and then the total)

[table=-]
1st Doz-2nd Doz-3rd Doz--1st Col-2nd Col-3rd Col- Total Wagered
71
-71
- -64
- - - -7
- - - - -38
- - - - - -14
- - - - - - -265 units
[/table]

Results Show that:-

[table=,]
Total Wagering for 30 Spins,Start BR,End BR,Profit,Ratio Wagering/Start BR, Ratio Wagering/Profit
265 units,1000,1050,50,0.265,5.3
[/table]

Therefore, over a quarter of the Original Starting Bankroll has been wagered during the 30 spins.

The Ratio of Wagering to Profit is a new figure, that prove important when we are comparing other "Routine" session with it.

Note.
Without taking the movement of the "Routine" progression bet over to the Columns on bet 18. its remarkable how similar the wagering values are for each of the Dozens.

More testing with minimum 100/150/200 spins should reveal whether these figures remain so cogent in the long run, and how extended spin data will reveal the Ratio of Wagering to Start Bank Roll, and Wagering to Profit changes.

We will see, As said the blind man looking in a darkened cellar for his black cat.

[tomtom]

Hi chrisbis,

Sorry to go back to the past on this subject, but could you explain a bit in detail how the actual betting on the dozens and the columns would look like?

Thank you for your time

Best Wishes

Tom-tom