• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Sixty/forty

Started by GLC, Sep 02, 12:13 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GLC

This is an idea I had for even chances.

Our basic bet is approximately 60% of the amount we are down.

If we are at -1 to -5, we will bet to win 1 unit.

That's it.  Here's an example:

1  L    -1
2  L    -3
4  W  +1  reset

1  L  -1
2  W +1  reset

1  L   -1
2  L   -3
4  L   -7
4  L   -11
6  W  -5
6  W  +1  reset

1  L   -1
2  L   -3
4  L   -7
4  L   -11
6  L   -17
10 W -7
4  W -3
4  L  -7
4  W -3
4  W  +1  reset

1  L   -1
2  L   -3
4  L   -7
4  L   -11
6  L   -17
10 L  -27
16 L  -43
24 W  -19
12 L   -31
17 W  -14
8  W  -6
4  W  -2
3  L   -5
6  W  +1  reset

With a good bank (500-1000 units) this is extremely stable and can weather some really bad deviations.  I've survived a 35% wins vs 65% losses with it pretty easily.  I only got to -110.

As you can see, with a good win vs loss ratio, it doesn't take long to pull out a win.

It's simple and easy to play.  Use your won bet selection.

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

vladir

As I recomended elsewhere in the forum, I wil do it again,  you should consider changing bet selection once in a while. If your bet selection was loosing at 35%, it should recover in the "near" future, so in this case  I would recomend you keep playing it till it reaches at least about 45% or maybe even more.

I also think that we should virtually play all EC's bet selection methods available, and change to real play everytime they drop bellow a certain winning percentage (anything less then 40%). This is just an idea I have, I don't have the means to track it exactly, currently I use RX to record spins and do some analysis "on the fly" while I play. I usually can only focus in 1 or 2 betting patterns a time, with a great margin for error, since I do it semi-manually. Yet, it is working wonderfully with the MM I use and I have not yet loss a session, neither I have passed from a 8 unit bet until now. I dont think I will ever lose a session, I dont have a stop limit, my limit is the bank roll, but in order for me to loose the bank roll I would need to have something like 100 losses - 10 wins or less ratio (don't think I will ever be able to see this happening, even if I tried to loose all my bets on purpose...)





"In God we trust; all others must bring data", W. Edwards Deming

RouletteExplorer

If your bet selection was losing at 35%, it should recover in the "near" future, so in this case  I would recomend you keep playing it till it reaches at least about 45% or maybe even more.

Gambling fallacy.
What we need is new thinking...

Jeromin

Quote from: RouletteExplorer on Sep 02, 02:46 PM 2011

Gambling fallacy.

I'm not so sure. I just checked  a couple dozen sessions on wiesbaden ( might do  more tomorrow ), and the less hit of red/black never goes below 44% ( avg.: 46.5% ). Yet in some instances the first 20 spins of the session lean towards one colour 3/1. It's a small sample, but still. Of course it may take a long time to balance.




Jeromin
The better the gambler, the worse the man.  Publilius Syrus

-