• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

One dozen or one column

Started by ego, Oct 08, 02:55 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

ego

 
I test random against random playing one dozen.
Follow the last six times, if a loss follow the last hit six times.

Now this is one very intressant tweak you can experiment with, reverse towards the chart above.
As one dozen should hit with in average at step 5 then if you have two dozen hit you only have to place three bets for the dozen that has no show, if a loss the dozen sleep over 6 times, that is reverse to the method above.
Then you wait until the unhit dozen hit and play the new sleeping dozen and you repeat that formula over and over again, so you play reverse.

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

 
Well i run one simulation testing the option one for even money bets using same selection - did pretty good.

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

jarabo002

Hello

It looks interesting, but do not quite understand how to make the first bet, do not quite understand this "Follow the last six times, if a loss follow the last hit six times," could clarify a little please? I would make a test of this system.

Do you use any tipe of progression or its a flat bet?

Thanks
Uno de Badajoz que pasaba por aquí.

ego

Quote from: jarabo002 on Oct 09, 05:54 AM 2011
Hello

It looks interesting, but do not quite understand how to make the first bet, do not quite understand this "Follow the last six times, if a loss follow the last hit six times," could clarify a little please? I would make a test of this system.


Do you use any tipe of progression or its a flat bet?

Thanks

Well the first method mention does follow the first dozen hit.
If dozen 1 hit you play dozen one until six loses.
Then if six loses and dozen 3 is last hit you play dozen 3 six times.
Progression 1 1 1 2 2 3  4 6 8 12 and so on ...

For the even money bet test i just wait for dozen 1 or 3 to hit once.
Then i follow the one that hit and play it until six loses and change to opposite.
Progression 1 1 1 2 3 5 - 8 13 21 34 55 89
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-