Roulette is a game of mathematical perfection

[MadMax]

Uups, Kattila was faster while I was doing my sheet. I post it anyhow, cause I also did it for the American Wheel.

The difference between my sheet and the one of Kattila: if 2 numbers lie directly beside each other (pe 15 and 19), my sheet will tell you CW 1, against what Kattilas sheet tells you CW 0.
Also note: on the sheet for the American wheel, you have to enter number 38 instead of 00!

Maybe its helpful for you.

[Turner]

It was very interesting to read. Please share your opinions

I knew what you were talking about when someone said the numbers were missing before I even downloaded it. I studied this months ago and built a tracker in XL. The numbers need setting to a colour, but if I remember rightly, one of the numbers is wrong, and throws you. Typo.

Basically, what the author theorises is this:
In 37 spins, numbers will double and treble, on average, 24 times, ala Law of the Third
He then says that you don't have to run 37, but can run 2 x 18, so one being the normal way, as you see them, and another way being sectors anticlockwise. Then you can do even more runs using different positions.

so 9 numbers from 9 different ways gives you 37 numbers which follow the law of the third perfectly.

Basically I can spin 9 times and have a full complement of 37 numbers

It doesn't work LoL. Nice try though because its thinking outside the box.

(later) sorry, when I said it doesnt work, the numbers from 9 runs follow the law of the third.

The trouble with LOTT is that you have absolutly no way of knowing what that 24 will look like. It will be 24 on average, but its shape is as random as the game itsself
If you bet on all 1 hits hoping they double, it gets too big. If you bet on all doubles hoping they treble, its easier on the BR, but there nothing to say you wont end up with a load of doubles that never trebled

[Master_of_pockets]

Thank you kattila and MadMax.
The correct way is with MadMax sheet. The zero position must be when the number will make a repeat.

Yes turnerfeck the way of combining the things with Turbos idea is wrong.But its a nice thought for other systems to be made.

Of course if the 1 event has -2.7 then combining an other event that has also -2.7 it leads to no advantage.(we will always have -2.7) Because no matter how many times we will add 0 to 0 , we will always have 0.
But we can give it a try.

[Turner]

Thank you kattila and MadMax.
The correct way is with MadMax sheet. The zero position must be when the number will make a repeat.

Yes turnerfeck the way of combining the things with Turbos idea is wrong.But its a nice thought for other systems to be made.

Of course if the 1 event has -2.7 then combining an other event that has also -2.7 it leads to no advantage.(we will always have -2.7) Because no matter how many times we will add 0 to 0 , we will always have 0.
But we can give it a try.

Do you know something?, you are absolutly correct. This idea didnt work really but it inspired me to think about other ideas, one of which I play currently, which I wont bore you with.

[Master_of_pockets]

Is it because you don t want to bore me , or is it because its a secret?

[Turner]

Is it because you don't want to bore me , or is it because its a secret?

Sorry, no, I meant I didnt want to hijack this post with another system.
I am writing it up as we speak and will post seperate. I want to test it further before anouncing that I have cracked the roulette code LOL

[Master_of_pockets]

If you will post it , we can help you with the testing.

[Turner]

If you will post it , we can help you with the testing.

I will, just about 70% typed up.

Dont get too excited, its just a repeat number law of the third system. Its just the progression that came to me that ironed out some of the misgivings with the way I used to play. 100% success this week on William Hill live Roulette (2 live dealer tables) Also, some nice actuals have come out of my testing. My £40 BR now sits at £130 for 30 mins play in total.
Give me a day or 2 to complete.

[reddwarf]

Hi Slatan,

A little late, but anyhow: always beware of people who claim hat they can help you and than end up with pages and pages of examples of their system: if a system exists, it can be explained without examples, simple as that; if a system exists you can even calculate the win probability etc, unless of course people claim that the state of mind is important, but then you do not have a falsifyable system anymore, but a belief, which is always true from the point of view of the believer)

Concerning the law of the third: this is just the consequence of what is called the "birthday paradox" how many people in a room do you need for the probability to be at  least 50% that 2 of them have thde same birthday?

This is common math and it can not be used to predict numbers... (Although it is not said that you cannot use it in another way - only I do not know of such a way)

grts reddwarf

[amk]

May I welcome Kimo Li to the forum............

Great to have another Legendary player amongst us...............

Hope we may hear from you more often Kimo Li

[Johnlegend]

It was very interesting to read. Please share your opinions

In fact ROULETTE is the exact opposite. Thats the train too many have yet to board.