FACE RECOGNITION VS ROULETTE

[ScoobyDoo]

Hi Guys,
Just had a dream while dozing off....Very interesting.

I was visualizing a face recognition software on a NCIS TV show. One face was showing on the left side of the screen.  The computer was whizzing through many other faces on the right side of the screen trying the match faces so they could identify the face on the left. For some reason that image converted to a roulette scenario....

Imagine roulette decisions going on in infinity in a straight line forever from right to left. Now you have a set of decisions that you want to play against those decisions that will be coming.

It is the same as having a photo that you're trying to match against a data-base of photos. The difference is that the roulette "data-base" has no end. So eventually the roulette "data-base will have a match for your set of decisions.

The more decisions you are trying not to match, the longer it will take but eventually the roulette "data-base will match it.

Now I have seen where other players say that changing the decisions in  the set, won't change a thing. I agree with that but I contend that if you continue to change the decisions at random intervals, it will take a lot longer before the roulette "data-base" will match your set of decisions. Just like it would take the "NCIS" computer a lot longer to match an ever-changing photo.

With that said, it would seem logical that you could win more than you lose by changing the decision sets. Just my meanderings....

Lets have some discussion about this.

Scooby Doo

[VLS]

Interesting Scooby, for some players "changing sets" means "changing systems" (Mr J., Goodhand).

This is open to debate, absolutelly.

Some people say: if all systems seem to work at the beginning... why don't we only play systems for a short time (beginning) and leave them alone and never play that system again.

We don't need to win for infinite time, only while we are alive 

[ScoobyDoo]

I guess changing systems would amount to the same thing as changing decision sets. In case some of you don't understand what I mean by decision set, here are some examples:

Betting that these dozens will not repeat in exact order 3,1, 2,1

Betting the Red & Black will not repeat in this exact order....RRBBRRBB

Betting these double streets will not show exactly the same in the next 6 spins..1,3,5,4,2,6

[F_LAT_INO]

Very often,when in casino with 6-8 playing tables,am going around
punting on 10-15 different methods,after each win,next method--easy ones
that don't need spreadsheet--and usually goes swell.

[Anima-t3d]

Changing systems is only needed when the casino is trying to manipulate their numbers, so you'd lose. Other than that, changing systems and having more profit is just a matter of luck (if all systems used have equal chances to be profitable when used alone, otherwise it's really gambling and that would mean it'd be the same just betting on red all the time)

SuperRoulette bot has a feature where you can stack all the systems you set up and use at random whenever you made a win on the active system. However I haven't used it, perhaps other SR users in this forum can share their experience.

IMO it's just the fact that if you use a new system and it doesn't perform from the start, that you won't use it at all. If you use a new system which looks promising, you'll use it... but it doesn't mean that if it works in the beginning, that it's actually a good system where you win longterm... therefor they'll crash and burn.. with or without help from the casino's.