Suit of Armor

[Norman Bates]

The first 12 - 12 chips, the second 12 - 15 chips, the third 12 - 18 chips, the first column - 8 chips, the second column - 11 chips, the third column - 14 chips.       Five chips on the 1, 4, 7, 10, 14, 17, 20, 23, 27, 30, 33, and 36 with four chips on the zero.     You can also try leaving the outside bets alone and moving the five chip bets on the inside to the 2,5,8,11,16,19,21,24,25,28,31,34 spots.    I like it better when it's set up that way anyway.   

  Basically what it is, is just to leave the outside bets the same, (twelve chips on the first set of twelve, fifteen chips on the second set twelve, and eighteen chips on the third set twelve.   Then by leaving eight chips on the first column, eleven chips on the second column, and fourteen chips on the third column of twelve).    Do not move or change these bets.

Now, notice how the inside bets of five chips each reside in sets of four betting locations in a row.   Coinciding  with the amount of chips bet on the outside.    So if you want your win/loss fluctuation  with higher highs, and lower lows bet the inside bets where the eighteen chips bet on the third twelve matches up with the fourteen chips on the third column of twelve.   These numbers being twenty seven, thirty, thirty three, and thirty six.   

Then you can choose to bet with a more even keel by lining up your five chip inside bets,(four in a row) where the number of chips on the outside coincide closer with the junction of  the columns, and sections of twelve.    For instance, you would want to bet where the twelve chips bet on the first twelve match up with the eleven chips bet on the second column.    That being the two, five, eight, and eleven betting locations, and the eighteen chips bet on the third twelve coincide with the eight chips bet on the first column.    ie: twenty five, twenty eight, thirty one, and thirty four betting locations on the layout.   that leaves less leeway, for a smoother ride.   

At no time should you change the denomination of any of these bets!!!  And remember, the inside bets should never end up with more than four chips in a column, and never more than four chips in each section of the first, second, or third twelve.    So, to make it sound easy, as long as you leave the outside bets alone, you can move the inside bets where ever you want to as long as they stay in the designated patterns that I just showed you. 

[weddings]

lost 500 in two of my recent sessions. if only earn if your numbers in the inside bets hits. which means outside bets are just for show. RNG or Live do you play this at?

[VLS]

Hey Norman, good to see you around.

Thanks for sharing your "Armored" method with us

[Norman Bates]

Thanks.  I'm having a blast!

[Norman Bates]

What is, "RNG"?

[A3on]

RNG stands for Random Number Generator

It's like a "virtual" roulette that "randomly" generates numbers, making it a quickest way to play. 
It's great if you like to lose your money and have "randomly" generated numbers hitting where you don't bet just by coincidence :D

[Norman Bates]

What ever's clever I guess.   Thanks for the heads up.   I know exactly how that feels.   Thanks for lmk

[Twisteruk]

"It is early morning in the overcast tip of Africa and nothing is as good as a cup of coffee and a brain teaser to get the juices flowing.
If I got the foregoing suggestion right, we cover every number on the lay out with columns and dozenââ,¬â,,¢s and hit the zero with 4 chips just for good measure. As surety we also put 5 chips on some single numbers, coordinated ââ,¬â€œ but still random ââ,¬â€œ as there are only 12 out of 36 and as we know, anything can happen.
Adding all chips, we have 142 of the play-play money on the table.
Here I would like to note that all casinos I frequent have a limit of 5 $ / Ã,£ / Euro / Rubel / Rand, etc on a single number and a minimum of 50 on outside wagers. This, naturally and otherwise impossible, leaves this means of betting limited to $ 1 chip tables?!
The sole reliance I can ascertain is on hitting all three options; dozen, column (naturally here one can not fail) and one of the 12 flat-bet numbers (which are highly fallible)
Having 142 down ââ,¬â€œ the wheel spins ââ,¬â€œ the excitement is running high ââ,¬â€œ and the confidence is in the clouds. Martini in hand and smirk on the face I am awaiting the drop of the ivory (or plastic).
It is #8. = D1 / C2 and No flat #. I get paid +46 and get robbed of -119 = loss -73.
Next spin #19 = D2 / C1 and again nothing else. = +46 / -122 = loss -76 (149 down)
Spin 3 = #33 = D3 / C3 and ââ,¬Å"eurekaââ,¬Â the 33 = + 239 / -105 = yield +134 (15 down)
The only chance here is the single number hitting every second spin and I can say with experienced confidence that this will not (never) happen.

This we could extend to infinity and waste some good sailing and gambling time.

It is my honest conviction that this betting of unfavourable odds on account of the high wager pattern and the low and very, very suspect yield pattern has little, and seriously believe, NO chance of earning Lunch, Supper, Drinks, Fuel, Rent, mistress or any other pi*& against the wall money; and here I mean the stuff governmentââ,¬â,,¢s print ââ,¬â€œ if surely anyone knows what I mean?
Please correct me if Iââ,¬â,,¢m wrong, but this game plan is a below 1:1 combination and will have to be archived under: tried it ââ,¬â€œ been there ââ,¬â€œ have the T-shirt (oh, sorry-forgot - I lost that too), and had a good laugh.
It is obviously ââ,¬Å"back to the cliffââ,¬Â for you, Norman - but good try."

Courtesy of Adolar so you can have another laugh Norman  

[Norman Bates]

Pardon any misconceptions madam.