Testing my misunderstood version of "Code 4" with "thepilot's" numbers

[TwoCatSam]

His post is at Code 4 thread.......

Here is what I studied.  The fourth must either be different or the same as the first.  I assume he uses A for dozens or maybe he writes them backwards but that would not matter.  What I found is there was never a time when a different column/dozen did not appear within three spins and there was never a time when a same col/doz did not appear within eight spins.  As far as the different col/dz, there were far more that the 66% one would expect on the first spin.  Now--may I speak of my wife again without criticism as she is a very serious player--Marcia would love the "sames" as she has a progression that goes all the way to eight steps so she would have never lost.  Had she lost, she would go to the six-point divisor and get back to zero.  This would be a perfect system for us as I could play the "different s" and she could play the "sames".  Now, we have to contend with the 0,00 wheel so that is a factor.  If the new version is any better than this, well, WE can't wait!

TwoCat and Miss Kitty