• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Once in 500 000 ... Once in 800 000 / 1M

Started by ego, May 23, 04:14 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ego

 
I had some fun with EC using formation and not colours.
All possibilitys using one cycel is 4.

1. XXX
2. XOX
3. XXO
4. XOO

3 out of 4 have one change present with make use making two bets to capture one.
Most of the time you get very long strings of winnings with small drawdowns.

Once in 500 000 trails on average does it hit formation 1 x 8 times.
It just is rare - but noting is due to happen.
Seris of 3 6 9 12 15 18 and so on is losing and 1 2 4 5 7 8 10 11 and so on winning.

If you want to pass 800 000 using 12 step fibo or see a small profit after 1M you could use formation 1 and 2 as bet selection.
After formation 1 hits three times in a row play for change.
After formation 2 hits three times in a row play FTL.

Or some one could add stopp/loss with recovery stages and develop a system witch accept loses.
You clustering the outcomes in sequenses of three.

How do i know this.
Because i run this simulation before where go for RR repeat or RBR back to back witch is seris of two after having a bet selection of three present singles RR B RRR B RR B RR where i aim for black only to change or become two as seire or singles.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

ego

Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

TwoCatSam

ego

Is formation one  1.XXX ?

You say "after formation one his three times in a row"............

Is that RRR RRR RRR  or could it be RRR BBB BBB or any combination of triplets?

This is quite interesting.

Thanks

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

ego

Quote from: TwoCatSam on May 23, 10:45 AM 2012
ego

Is formation one  1.XXX ?

You say "after formation one his three times in a row"............

Is that RRR RRR RRR  or could it be RRR BBB BBB or any combination of triplets?

This is quite interesting.

Thanks

Sam

Any combination of triplets or back to back pattern.
Witch would be the same as playing against three isolated singles events.
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

-