Promising 2 dozen bet tweak A

[GLC]

George, do you think that flat betting could work with this, based on your tests so far?
After all that would be the ideal solution

BW,   Good question.

As you know this system is just your original idea trimmed down to only 1 bet on each trigger instead of 2.  And a couple of "no bet" tweaks that may or may not really make that much difference in the long run.

You, myself and a whole gaggle of other members on this forum have been enjoying this quest for the ideal roulette system for quite some time now.  To say a system will work with a flat bet is a pretty big step. 

We've tested a lot of system that looked promising for quite a while only to fall apart eventually.  So, I have to say that it's way too early to make that assessment.  I don't see any reason for this system to work any better than just betting on the last 2 dozens to spin.  The fact that it is so far may and probably only means that we haven't run across the sequence that corrects the favorable win rate.

I'm still hoping that there's a system that will almost win with a flat bet that we can use a very mild progression on and stay ahead of the game.  It won't be guaranteed because even with a 5% advantage, because of "The gambler's ruin curve" random can throw a bad enough series of spins to wipe us out.

Here's how I'm looking at this.  I shoot for 10 units ahead each trip with the attitude that only 1 unit of the 10 will ultimately be profits, because we know there will be losing sessions and it's totally naive to think you can just win every time you go.

George