It takes 2 to tango

[eddy35]

I am not a big fan of agressive progression but after seeing this one I came up with an idea.

The complete progression Loss risk 0.71%
(99.29 chance of success)
1 Double Street.

Bet amt.......win
1..............05
1..............04
1..............03
2..............07
2..............05

3..............08
4..............10
5..............11
6..............11
7..............10

9..............13
11.............14
14.............18
18.............24
22.............26

27.............29
31.............22
37.............21
45.............24
55.............29

67.............34
82.............42
97.............35
115............28
136............18

164............22
200............38
240............38
--------------
1402 units total

Why not playing this progression on 2 Double Streets at the same time?  If one progression is getting too high and the double street with the low number of chips wins, why not split the bet?
Most of the time you don't need to  fully recover to get on a new high again so you can start at the original bet amount.

For example...................... you have 3 chips on a double street and 11 on the other. The double street with 3 chips wins, so now you should bet 14 chips and start betting 1 chip on a new double street. So why not put 7 chips on 2 double Streets? Very often if 1 of the 2 hits, you're recovered.

I made a profit of 502 units in 402 spins playing this.

I think this is a great way of playing. You can chose when you start splitting the bets, if you want to play low risk you can start splitting early in the progression.

What do you guys think about this?

[ignatus]

Great progression...

Now following Hermes advice "Always wait for virtual win before bet" would improve this strategy even more...(avoid long losing streaks)

And stoploss: if no hit for 2 spins STOP.

This combined with 2 doublestreets cyclic progression 1122334455...+1/-1

Works very well.

[Chris555p]

HI Eddy

Is to possible to give some actual spin numbers as examples to how you actually play it......?  thanks.

Cheers

Chris

[ignatus]

2 doublestreets

1 1 2 3 4 5 7 10 14 20 28 39 55

Just tried playing this non-stop +100u, (RNG) Never went beyond 7:th step in progression-

[Chrisbis]

The two parallel progressions, side by side, is an interesting theory, esp if You can move the bet according to Trend.

Its like having the ability to "Read Random", all over again.

I am pretty sure, from my memory banks, that Superman (forum member, not Hollywood action man),
has coded this idea couple of years ago, we we were looking into alternative bets.
I'm sure he devised a "If ahead, reset progressions to EVENS" type program for something like this bet.
In the long run (as with all fixed bets), it did not work, but short runs, (No, not hit and run),
and spotting a trend, may suit this type of bet & could bring in short term gains.
The critical path on this one, is spotting the reset or - re-alignment point at which to LEVEL out the progressions.
When that it done, You are in recovery mode, even though it looks like You are Parlaying the bets.
One sure way to help, is to automate the two Lines(Double Streets) BankRoll, so that a close eye is kept on the them, ensuring of course, that the main objective of Winning (Profit) is met at the end.

I will leave to Superman to tell U more, should he pop in and rest his cape a while.
cheers.

Side Note*
One beauty of the Two LInes bet working in Parallel, is its like having a Dozen bet,
that You can split and share amongst the field of play!

[ignatus]

Looking at your single ds progression, comparing it to a 6 numbers progression:

1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,14. 6numbers

1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,11,14,18,22,27,31,37  1doublestreet

18-step progression

Then, would not the better option be to play with the 6-numbers progression?

[superman]

I will leave to Superman to tell U more, should he pop in and rest his cape a while

I think you're right Chris, it does sound familiar, been very busy lately, what with the new movie I just released etc, now they want another one!!!

Will look through the old files and report if I find something

[just10minutes]

Looking at your single ds progression, comparing it to a 6 numbers progression:

1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,14. 6numbers

1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,11,14,18,22,27,31,37  1doublestreet

18-step progression

Then, would not the better option be to play with the 6-numbers progression?

Hi Ignatus,

The progression in 6 numbers have to be multiplied by 6 isn't it?
Please correct me if I am wrong

[superman]

The progression in 6 numbers have to be multiplied by 6 isn't it?

Thats correct as you need those amounts on EACH number, Ignatus is still learning.

[ignatus]

Yes, im still learning...