Matrix 9

[ignatus]

I had luck with this bet, haven't tried it enough (more testing is needed)

Divide the table into four matrix' of nine: 1-9, 10-18, 19-27, 28-36.

Trigger:

Now wait for 3 different matrix' to be hit.

There are only 2 basic bets: (Take 1-9 for an example) if any of numbers 1,3,5,7,9 are hit numbers 2,4,6,8 is bet (and the opposite is true) if 2,4,6,8 are hit 1,3,5,7,9 is bet. (This goes for all matrix' of nine, same principle,)

Matrix 19-27: if numbers 20,22,24,26 is hit, 19,21,23,25,27 is bet.

So trigger is, bet the numbers as described within 3 different matrix' of nine. Opposite from Lastest 3 hits in 3 different matrix's  (as described)

An example

Numbers hit: 2,4,14,34

2: this is ignored since 4 is latest hit

4:(Matrix 1) numbers 1,3,5,7,9 is bet
14: (matrix 2) numbers 11,13,15,17 is bet
34: (matrix 4) numbers 29,31,33,35 is bet

Progression:

12 Numbers = 1 1 2 3 4 6 9 14 21 31 47 70 105
13 Numbers = 1 1 2 3 4 7 11 17 27 42 66
14 Numbers = 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 22 36 58
15 Numbers = 1 1 2 3 6 10 17 29 50

This will be a 12-15 numbers bet

[Chrisbis]

Hi Ignatus.....

Lets see if I got this right now.

You are tracking three 9 number Matrix (which are now commonly called "Quads", as termed by
our esteemed colleague 'Turner'. (Thanks T)

And, when You have hit three of the four Quads, you then analyse what you hit within those three Quads.
Am I right so far?

So.....lets play an imaginary game.
Here are some spins, and their equivalent Quads.

19.......Q3
10.......Q2
12.......Q2
2.........Q1
[reveal=Rest of these spins]
27
21
23
7
20
31
16
20
7
[/reveal]

So, we have, in the red corner.......Q1 which has hit #2, so we will be betting on #1,3,5,7,9 within that Quad
...................in the blue corner......Q2 which has hit #10 &#12, so we will be on #11,13,15,17 within that Quad
And finally, the referee..................Q3 which has hit #19, so we will also bet on #20,22,24,26 in that Quad

This makes the total bet:-

#1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,20,22,24,26 (which is 13 Unique inside numbers)

Am I anywhere near the right description for this method Ignatus?

Cheers
Christopher

BTw next number out was 27, then 21 (see the reveal)

[ignatus]

Yes, that's correct