Do you think...2 dozens...?

[jarabo002]

Hi to everybody.

I still think that this is the best and the biggest roulette forum in the world so I have this question for you dear memebers:

Do you think a progression consisting of two dozens bet and a large bankroll (> 1000 units) may be winning over thousands of games?

Please, vote and comment.

Thanks!

[GLC]

Jara,  I don't mean to be pessimistic, just realistic.  I'm going to repeat something I've said multiple times but it's the elephant in the room and he never leaves.

As long as there is one or more numbers that can cause you to lose, eventually they will come up close enough together to drive you into a hole.  If you have enough money and are playing for small enough units to stay under the table limit, you can stay under the limit for a very long time.  With luck, a very, very long time.

Remember Winkels "Win as much as you want" topic:

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3928.0

It's a good read to show the intermix between bankroll requirements and betting methods.

I've often said that with a 5,000 unit bankroll, you can replicate his results playing many of the better systems put forth on this forum.

Nothing is bullet proof.  Except Teo's system.  If he says it's bullet proof, it's bullet proof!  But remember, you have to be able to play it perfectly in your sleep and you have to have a barrel full of chips to ride out the down swings.  Just like Winkels system.

George

[TwoCatSam]

"Nothing is bullet proof.  Except Teo's system.", said the man from Arizona.

George

I guess I've had my nose in robots too long.  Who is "Teo"--which is uncle in Spanish, if memory serves--and where can I find Uncle Teo's system?

If'n it's bullet proof, I'll spend some more of my Social Security--borrowed from China, of course--and have it botted.

Sam

[jarabo002]

George  and Sam, expecting your reply  before any. George, who else you know more than two dozen progressions?

Some of your progressions in this case if you have a large bankroll can be successful, that's my point, but as I'm not entirely sure, I prefer to ask the staff of this forum, which is the most suitable place for it.

Until now I have only some a bit of success with the streets and two dozen. A few hours ago I discarded the streets and I'll take two dozens, with no zero roulette, very small bets and a large bankroll, those are the only tools I have saved from the stake. With everything else or I failed or not interest me at all.

On the other hand I do not remember who is Teo, can you clarify who is Teo and what is his system please?

By the way Sam, in spanish uncle is "tio".

Thank you both for your participation.

[Turner]

jarabo,

I thought of this, but never got around to doing anything with it. it shows the patterns of D1 vs D2 &D3.....and all the other combinations including Columns.

Theres something in here. i just cant see it. Perhaps you can?

[GLC]

"Nothing is bullet proof.  Except Teo's system.", said the man from Arizona.

George

I guess I've had my nose in robots too long.  Who is "Teo"--which is uncle in Spanish, if memory serves--and where can I find Uncle Teo's system?

If'n it's bullet proof, I'll spend some more of my Social Security--borrowed from China, of course--and have it botted.

Sam

Teo?

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13392.0

[jarabo002]

jarabo,

I thought of this, but never got around to doing anything with it. it shows the patterns of D1 vs D2 &D3.....and all the other combinations including Columns.

Theres something in here. i just can't see it. Perhaps you can?

Turner, I dont belive in that patterns, I can not see anything conclusive on that.

For me, the most interesting of the two dozen bets  is the sequence WL as it is a type of bet where the most normal it's to see two or more consecutive Ws, giving a long series of Ws.

[Turner]

Turner, I don't belive in that patterns, I can not see anything conclusive on that.

For me, the most interesting of the two dozen bets  is the sequence WL as it is a type of bet where the most normal it's to see two or more consecutive Ws, giving a long series of Ws.

I didnt get it to work either, its just the idea to assign 2 to a single and 1 to a double. You can see the totals at the top are close, so its like EC.