• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

50/50-Streets

Started by ignatus, Jun 26, 09:30 AM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Turner

its a great idea (mathematically) to assume that a 2 series or single will come before 3 series. So this idea is correct from a maths view. it doesnt, however, consider variance, and the variance is same as betting EC. In fact, it is the same as waiting for 3 red and betting black.

if you think betting against a higher series in favor of a lesser series, it makes sense, but it is best to bet against a much higher series, as it is much more rare to continue to an even rarer series as opposed to it stopping.

look at the last 6 or more streets. The wheel always produces extremes.

last>>>>10,1,22,22,17,31,29,10,7

up to 7, this is an EC (6 streets) which has hit 8 times. This is rare in EC (clearly not in random)

So bet streets 2,3,5,7,9,12   

And you dont have to wait 317 spins to see it as red or high or odd (series of eight) or 74 spins (6) or 654 spins (9). You saw a series of eight in eight spins....not 317.

These things are happening all the time. See, red is just one set of 18. There are millions of groups of 18 happening all the time.

look at random, not the pretty colours

And Ignatus is thinking "why is Turner being so nice?"

Well I wont disappoint.

Any school boy knows betting martingale on EC is the "most proven disaster waiting to happen"

Perhaps 122, or 123 or cycles. Even labby is a bad idea for EC. perhaps read some GLC.

I do often

ignatus

Thanks Turner.  :) Nice seeing you around, haven't seen you for awhile!

i am aware of the risks playing this strategy, with martingale, yes it's waiting for disaster. i mention this earlier. i myself had to go further than six step in the progression, even waiting for a trigger set to five...anyway, i don't know what other progression that might be better? stoploss is also a good idea...

i didn't know this strategy would  be so popular and liked here at rouletteforum, the responses are over my expectation, really.
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

Proofreaders2000

How about a trigger set for 10?

Or a difference of 10 between the two groups.

Example: A has 5 hits, B has 15 hits (trigger)

Bet A with the six-leg progression.

sturrock

Maybe it would be a good system to "Bot" with a trigger set to 10 or even 12 it would save sitting for hours waiting???? Just an idea!

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-