• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

DNA system testing (AKA Trylobit comes back;) )

Started by trylobit, Nov 03, 09:40 AM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

superman

Hi Guys

What system are you reffering to, whats the spreadsheet set to look for? is it that DNA pdf that people have mentioned lately? The DNA of roulette
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

weddings

may I know the legends to the shortforms? what does NSO / EV / CIH / SV / Invert / CS means?
-----

malcop

Hi All,

This thread is referring to the DNA of Roulette system, please, please, please do not use this spreadsheet until you have at least tried to familiarise yourself with this system not to do so would be a mistake!

The spread sheet is a very good way of learning learning this system, so if nothing else treat it as a learning tool.

I have attached the manual for those that do not have the updated manual.

Thanks

malcop

weddings

Oh so it was this DNA i thought it was donny's millionaire version=/ Will do some testing thanks!
-----

superman

I program and am having trouble understanding the fundamentals, is nobody going to give us a shortened version, if this happens do that, we will get more testers if everybody understands it!
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

malcop

Quote from: superman on Nov 03, 02:18 PM 2010
I program and am having trouble understanding the fundamentals, is nobody going to give us a shortened version, if this happens do that, we will get more testers if everybody understands it!
Hi superman,

I have been very busy but I have offered to help anyone learn this system I can get anyone up and rounding with this system in 30-60 minutes.

All you have to do is contact me on skype1960 so we can arrange a time.

Can't be fairer than that.

Thanks

malcop

trylobit

Hi all!

There was an update that is suppose to bring more profit. I will modify the spreadsheet tonight and start a new treat.

Guys: this is not a dummy spreadsheet. Read the manual for the system, learn it and then use the spreadsheet.

About that strange message about data loss try download it with a different web browser.

Best regards.

superman

@ malcop

thanks for the offer of skype but I use satelite internet and VOIP is not good, I would spend most of the time deciphering your words

I think I can sum up how this bet works, correct me if I am wrong please

We are working only with the last 3 results, they need checking twice

1st check

IF the last result is the same as the one before it, score = +
IF the last result is NOT the same as the one before it, score = -

we now have SCORE ( a "+" OR a "-") the PDF calls it the PIVOT SIGN

IF score = +
THEN check the 3rd result back to get score 2

IF score2 = +
bet 2 chips on same as last result, single doz/col bet
IF score2 = -
bet 1 chip on the other 2 that are NOT the last dozen/column, dual doz/col bet

Is that correct? if it is then I have some results for playtech rng, I bolted the above method into an old dozens tool I had which also bet on 2 or 1 at a time, I haven't added columns to it yet, if the above is correct then I will add columns to the bot and give you some more results, real money mode of course. I don't actually place bets in real mode when testing, I just log the data which is exactly the same.

EDIT: forgot to mention, I have used progression just because it was already in the script in the bot, the usual 1,3,9,27 etc for dual bets and x2 martingale on the singles, you can see from the file how many times progression kicked in, any questions ask.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

esoito

Quote from: superman on Nov 05, 04:06 PM 2010
@ malcop

thanks for the offer of Skype but I use satelite internet and VOIP is not good, I would spend most of the time deciphering your words

I think I can sum up how this bet works, correct me if I am wrong please

We are working only with the last 3 results, they need checking twice

1st check

IF the last result is the same as the one before it, score = +
IF the last result is NOT the same as the one before it, score = -

we now have SCORE ( a "+" OR a "-") the PDF calls it the PIVOT SIGN

IF score = +
THEN check the 3rd result back to get score 2

IF score2 = +
bet 2 chips on same as last result, single doz/col bet
IF score2 = -
bet 1 chip on the other 2 that are NOT the last dozen/column, dual doz/col bet

Is that correct? if it is then I have some results for playtech rng, I bolted the above method into an old dozens tool I had which also bet on 2 or 1 at a time, I haven't added columns to it yet, if the above is correct then I will add columns to the bot and give you some more results, real money mode of course. I don't actually place bets in real mode when testing, I just log the data which is exactly the same.

EDIT: forgot to mention, I have used progression just because it was already in the script in the bot, the usual 1,3,9,27 etc for dual bets and x2 martingale on the singles, you can see from the file how many times progression kicked in, any questions ask.


If Malcop basically agrees with this then we finally have a simplified step flow.

Well done! And thank you for posting this.

malcop

Quote from: superman on Nov 05, 04:06 PM 2010
@ malcop

thanks for the offer of Skype but I use satelite internet and VOIP is not good, I would spend most of the time deciphering your words

I think I can sum up how this bet works, correct me if I am wrong please

We are working only with the last 3 results, they need checking twice

1st check

IF the last result is the same as the one before it, score = +
IF the last result is NOT the same as the one before it, score = -

we now have SCORE ( a "+" OR a "-") the PDF calls it the PIVOT SIGN

IF score = +
THEN check the 3rd result back to get score 2

IF score2 = +
bet 2 chips on same as last result, single doz/col bet
IF score2 = -
bet 1 chip on the other 2 that are NOT the last dozen/column, dual doz/col bet

Is that correct? if it is then I have some results for playtech rng, I bolted the above method into an old dozens tool I had which also bet on 2 or 1 at a time, I haven't added columns to it yet, if the above is correct then I will add columns to the bot and give you some more results, real money mode of course. I don't actually place bets in real mode when testing, I just log the data which is exactly the same.

EDIT: forgot to mention, I have used progression just because it was already in the script in the bot, the usual 1,3,9,27 etc for dual bets and x2 martingale on the singles, you can see from the file how many times progression kicked in, any questions ask.
Hi superman,

Slight correction,

First of all you look at the last spin to see if it was a + or -

If it was a + then you go back two spins including the last spin to find the spin sign
if it was a - then you go back three spins including the last spin to find the spin sign

now if you have a + sign you are betting for a repeat of the last outcome, that means you place two chips on the dozen that came out last.

If you have - sign you are betting for opposite to last so you place 1 chip on the two dozens that did not come out last.

So in a nutshell you are either betting same or opposite to last depending on what sign you have.

If you now go through pages 8, 9 and 10 a few times it will become automatic working out where you will be placing you bets

Thanks

malcop

malcop

Needless to say you do the same as above for columns

iceman1313

Hello again

This system has been around for a few years It's the old Donny's millionaire version. Forget it I have talked to him about it.

Cheers

malcop

Icman1313

Have even you looked at the manual, the only similarity is that it used dozens and columns that is it.

I/we know their are other systems out their that bet the dozens/columns at the same time we all know that.

Prove to us all that this is the same as Donny Millionaire word for word.

If I'm wrong then I will Apologise!

I/We are waiting!

Thanks

malcop

malcop

Quote from: iceman1313 on Nov 06, 03:06 AM 2010
Hello again

This system has been around for a few years It's the old Donny's millionaire version. Forget it I have talked to him about it.

Cheers
Iceman1313,

As an update I have a copy of Donny's millionaire's DNA (Divine Number Algorithm)

The only thing similarity is both systems use DNA in the system title and that is where it ends, if you have both systems and checked you would know that.

Thanks

malcop

esoito

Quote from: iceman1313 on Nov 06, 03:06 AM 2010
Hello again

This system has been around for a few years It's the old Donny's millionaire version. Forget it I have talked to him about it.

Cheers

May I suggest, iceman1313,  that to prevent footinthemouthitis in future you actually read stuff carefully before posting on this forum?

In that way you will clearly demonstrate whether or not you know what you are talking about.

Please note the following:

1  The DNA system we are testing is NOTHING TO DO AT ALL with the Donny Millionaire version.

2  The letters DNA is the only common factor!

3  They are both TOTALLY DIFFERENT documents. The content is different. The methods are different. The writing styles are different. Everything is different.


Unlike you, I have carefully read both
before writing this post.

-