Previous Six DS

[Celticknits]

Next test.

Code Select Expand


DS Wins Info BR
5-5-5-0-1-2
6-1-5-5-2-6 1 
4-1-1-6-6-1 1 
5-5-1-2-5-2 1 
2-3-4-4-6-2 1 
3-6-4-3-2-6 1 
3-4-1-1-6-6 2
2-5-2-1-1-4 1
5-3-1-6-4-3 0
3-4-2-3-1-3 1 0
4-2-2-1-4-5 1
4-5-6-5-1-2 1
1-5-5-5-5-1 2
4-6-1-1-6-4 0
3-2-5-1-4-3 1 +2
5-3-4-5-1-2 0
4-2-6-0-1-4 1 +3
2-3-4-0-3-6 0 nb
4-2-4-4-4-2 1
5-1-2-6-5-0 0 nb
2-5-4-6-5-5 2
1-6-5-3-2-1 0
6-5-3-5-1-2 0 -3
2-5-4-6-4-5 1 +1
2-1-6-2-4-2 2
5-0-1-4-5-3 0 nb
5-6-2-0-1-5 1
1-1-5-3-3-4 0 nb
4-5-6-1-1-1 0
5-5-2-1-2-2 2 +5
4-6-5-6-2-3 1
2-6-1-5-5-2 1
4-3-3-5-6-4 1
6-5-4-5-4-2 1
2-4-1-4-3-3 0
1-3-1-5-2-2 1 +8
6-1-6-4-5-3 0
4-1-5-2-5-3 3 +12
5-3-3-5-6-1 0
3-2-3-4-3-4 1 +15
5-4-2-4-2-1 1
247 spins
2015-12-15
Table 5
Duisburg


-celescliff

Wow that would have have been a lot waiting around between some of the betting triggers for a +15 unit win if you plaid this sequence live in a B&M.
At 30 spins per hour that would have taken over 8 hours.
Talk about a minimum wage job (LOL).

-Celtic

[MrJ]

You bring up a great point as I have noted in the past. Number of ACTUAL spins PER HOUR at a REAL casino.....must be considered when posting testing results.

Ken

[celescliff]

-celescliff

Wow that would have have been a lot waiting around between some of the betting triggers for a +15 unit win if you plaid this sequence live in a B&M.
At 30 spins per hour that would have taken over 8 hours.
Talk about a minimum wage job (LOL).

-Celtic

1 unit = whatever units you wish to play with. It doesent have to be 1$, if you played with 10$ or 25$ dollars than 150$ or 375$ is not bad at all in 8 hours.

You bring up a great point as I have noted in the past. Number of ACTUAL spins PER HOUR at a REAL casino.....must be considered when posting testing results.

Ken

I play at online casino with 60 spin averege per hour, which I know a lot of people do here. Plus I track three tables which I also know a lot of people do, at once and this was for just one. Previous tests have been shorter.

[Celticknits]

1 unit = whatever units you wish to play with. It doesent have to be 1$, if you played with 10$ or 25$ dollars than 150$ or 375$ is not bad at all in 8 hours.

Understood but I think you would be too obvious to the casino staff in a B&M sitting there for 8 hours and waiting quite a while between bets. I have been approached in the past for waiting just 4 spins for a trigger to show and was told to either bet more or let another player into the game. This is a great method but I think it would be better played online as you stated below where there are a lot more spins per hour.


I play at online casino with 60 spin averege per hour, which I know a lot of people do here. Plus I track three tables which I also know a lot of people do, at once and this was for just one. Previous tests have been shorter.

I think you are right. I will have to set myself up for online casinos.
I still think this is a great system!!!

-celescliff

[celescliff]

Thanks, Celtic. And good luck. 

[nottophammer]

You all know i use RNG well heres some and its does the job

Code Select Expand

DS     W Info BR
5-5-5-6-4-5
4-4-5-2-1-1 1
5-1-4-4-3-2 0
6-5-3-6-3-0 1 +1
6-5-5-0-2-5 2 nb
5-4-5-4-1-1 1 nb
1-5-4-2-2-3 0
2-0-5-5-2-2 1 +2
6-6-4-3-3-1 0 nb
3-2-6-1-5-4 0
3-1-1-3-1-3 1 +7
6-5-6-2-1-3 2 nb
5-5-6-2-4-1 3 nb
1-5-4-1-3-4 1 nb
3-3-5-3-0-6 0 nb
1-1-0-6-2-6 1 nb
4-6-6-1-3-6 1 nb
3-3-2-3-5-5 0
5-3-6-6-1-5 2 +11
2-4-3-3-4-5 1 nb
5-1-3-1-3-3 1 nb
4-1-4-4-1-2 1 nb
6-0-1-2-2-4 0 nb
1-3-1-5-1-1 1 nb
3-1-5-3-5-3 0
1-3-3-1-2-3 1 +11
5-6-4-5-2-3 2 nb
1-6-2-4-5-6 1 nb
1-3-4-1-1-0 1 nb
5-1-5-5-6-4 0 nb
1-4-4-1-4-5 0
2-4-1-2-4(end) 2 +15


[celescliff]

Thanks notto for sharing. 

[mogul397]

Zumma pg 37


4 4 2 4 6 1
5 2 5 6 1 5        L
5 0 2 6 1 3        W
4 5 6 6 2 4        W
2 6 2 6 4 4        W
4 5 2 3 1 2        W
1 4 3 3 3 5        W
4 6 4 4 5 3        L
0 3 1 3 6 4        L
5 6 3 1 4 6        L

I don't show a profit.

[RouletteGhost]

great strategy

[mogul397]

I do them all aswell.

5 6 1 3 1 2
3 4 5 1 2 5 = 0            <<<<<<<<<<<<
4 6 1 3 5 1 = 0 -6
2 6 4 2 0 0 = 1 -2
0 4 3 6 4 4 = 0             <<<<<<<<<<<<
1 1 4 3 4 2 = 1 -1
5 3 0 1 5 4 = 0             <<<<<<<<<<<<<<

I'm not sure how you keep score. The "0" doesn't mean that
you broke even.  You lost all 6 bets.  -6.


please dont' say there are zeros. They al don't have zeros.



0 2 3 5 5 6 = 1 +0
5 2 4 1 4 3 = 2
1 4 4 6 3 3 = 2
2 6 6 1 3 3 = 2
2 1 2 3 3 3 = 3
3 3 1 4 1 1 = 0
3 3 2 4 3 5 = 3 +5
6 6 5 1 6 1 = 0
0 4 4 0 2 6 = 0  -1
1 6 3 0 5 5 = 0  < not this, since you have two 0 last matrix
6 3 6 4 1 6 = 0  < not this either since 0 came up on last matrix
3 1 2 5 2 2 = 0  -7
3 5 1 4 5 2 = 2  +3

Maybe that clears it up how I would play. I don't play every spin anymore.

[celescliff]

Read this:

0-1-2-3-4-5
1-2-2-4-5-6  < you wont bet on next matrix since we have a zero in the last matrix AND have a win in the current matrix (third spin)

1-2-3-4-5-6
2-3-4-5-6-5 < you bet on next matrix since we have no zero in the last matrix AND have no wins in the current matrix and no zeros in the current matrix aswell.

Then read carefully what I'm doing here:

5 6 1 3 1 2
3 4 5 1 2 5 = 0
4 6 1 3 5 1 = 0 -6
2 6 4 2 0 0 = 1 -2
0 4 3 6 4 4 = 0
1 1 4 3 4 2 = 1  < dont play since 0 came up last matrix
5 3 0 1 5 4 = 0
0 2 3 5 5 6 = 1  < dont play this either
5 2 4 1 4 3 = 2
1 4 4 6 3 3 = 2
2 6 6 1 3 3 = 2
2 1 2 3 3 3 = 3
3 3 1 4 1 1 = 0
3 3 2 4 3 5 = 3 +3
6 6 5 1 6 1 = 0
0 4 4 0 2 6 = 0  -3
1 6 3 0 5 5 = 0  < not this, since you have two 0 last matrix
6 3 6 4 1 6 = 0  < not this either since 0 came up on last matrix
3 1 2 5 2 2 = 0  -9
3 5 1 4 5 2 = 2  +1 (this chart was while I tested doing a mild progression so I bet 2 units on this)

I'm not sure how you keep score. The "0" doesn't mean that
you broke even.  You lost all 6 bets.  -6.

0 = number of wins -6 is the current bankroll.

4 4 2 4 6 1        tracking
5 2 5 6 1 5        L          (here we have a valid loss with no zeros in the previous matrix and no wins and zeros in the current matrix)
5 0 2 6 1 3        W  +5   (win on first spin +5)
4 5 6 6 2 4        W  nb
2 6 2 6 4 4        W  nb
4 5 2 3 1 2        W  nb
1 4 3 3 3 5        W  nb   (there are no bets all the way since we need a valid loss)
4 6 4 4 5 3        L          (here we have a valid loss with no zeros in the previous matrix and wins and zeros in the current matrix)
0 3 1 3 6 4        L   -1    (had a loss here -1)
5 6 3 1 4 6        L   nb   (no bet since we have a zero in the previous matrix)

I need more spins but if you don't have anymore, -1 on this.

[mogul397]

Read this:

0-1-2-3-4-5
1-2-2-4-5-6  < you wont bet on next matrix since we have a zero in the last matrix AND have a win in the current matrix (third spin)

1-2-3-4-5-6
2-3-4-5-6-5 < you bet on next matrix since we have no zero in the last matrix AND have no wins in the current matrix and no zeros in the current matrix aswell.

Then read carefully what I'm doing here:

5 6 1 3 1 2
3 4 5 1 2 5 = 0
4 6 1 3 5 1 = 0 -6
2 6 4 2 0 0 = 1 -2
0 4 3 6 4 4 = 0
1 1 4 3 4 2 = 1  < dont play since 0 came up last matrix
5 3 0 1 5 4 = 0
0 2 3 5 5 6 = 1  < dont play this either
5 2 4 1 4 3 = 2
1 4 4 6 3 3 = 2
2 6 6 1 3 3 = 2
2 1 2 3 3 3 = 3
3 3 1 4 1 1 = 0
3 3 2 4 3 5 = 3 +3
6 6 5 1 6 1 = 0
0 4 4 0 2 6 = 0  -3
1 6 3 0 5 5 = 0  < not this, since you have two 0 last matrix
6 3 6 4 1 6 = 0  < not this either since 0 came up on last matrix
3 1 2 5 2 2 = 0  -9
3 5 1 4 5 2 = 2  +1 (this chart was while I tested doing a mild progression so I bet 2 units on this)

0 = number of wins -6 is the current bankroll.

4 4 2 4 6 1        tracking
5 2 5 6 1 5        L          (here we have a valid loss with no zeros in the previous matrix and no wins and zeros in the current matrix)
5 0 2 6 1 3        W  +5   (win on first spin +5)
4 5 6 6 2 4        W  nb
2 6 2 6 4 4        W  nb
4 5 2 3 1 2        W  nb
1 4 3 3 3 5        W  nb   (there are no bets all the way since we need a valid loss)
4 6 4 4 5 3        L          (here we have a valid loss with no zeros in the previous matrix and wins and zeros in the current matrix)
0 3 1 3 6 4        L   -1    (had a loss here -1)
5 6 3 1 4 6        L   nb   (no bet since we have a zero in the previous matrix)

I need more spins but if you don't have anymore, -1 on this.

not sure when that adaptation came in.  But it's also troubling to me
that I have a cluster of wins, and then the losses.

So I guess I might hat one win in the first row, and then sit out
all the "wins". and then he hit with a loss after waiting for the
row of losses as a signal.

A lot of sitting around.

[celescliff]

not sure when that adaptation came in.  But it's also troubling to me
that I have a cluster of wins, and then the losses.

So I guess I might hat one win in the first row, and then sit out
all the "wins". and then he hit with a loss after waiting for the
row of losses as a signal.

A lot of sitting around.

Yeah, that's why I track 3 tables at once.

I've also been using another tweak that you bet on every matrix except if a zero come in the last matrix and in the current matrix.

These two games are played with real money and playing with 10$ so last night I made 270$ using this tweak. These two took 1 hour to play. Stop at +10 and stop loss -30.