Hiding behind

[Foolwise]

For long we have had the discussion around house edge, math, playing using the physical variable so on and so forth. Every time someone comes with a system, the math guys will simulate over a million spins and say that it is failing. Fair and square. But is it not one sided.

Where is the simulation and proof that VB is working. Where is the simulation and proof that bias based methods are working. Where is simulation and proof that computer based methods of working. Who is simulating them over a million spins to say that ultimately the house edge is catching them. Are they really hiding under the hood? Is it based on testimonials which can be clearly orchestrated to mask the truth. Is it based on  few success stories, which might ultimately fail long term.

[nottophammer]

Hi Foolwise
You summed in another thread that math dont work in roulette.

Math formulas do work, but as Turner showed Denzie back to back #'s hit far more than the 1060 spins to hit.
Take todays #'s spins 11,12 then 14,15  so i'll for get the maths

Code Select Expand

jackpot247 18.4.16
1 7
2 23
3 5
4 14
5 4
6 15
7 3
8 35
9 30
10 32
11 26
12 26
13 6
14 20
15 20
16 16
17 18
18 20
19 33
20 30
21 8
22 29
23 5
24 27
25 24
26 28
27 24
28 31
29 6
30 11
31 28
32 7
33 22
34 9
35 18
36 10
37 30
38 19
39 16
40 30
41 5
42 12
43 36
44 21
45 1
46 13
47 34
48 5
49 30
50 18
51 23
52 2
53 26
54 29
55 7
56 31
57 24
58 27
59 1
60 21

61 27
62 10
63 0
64 20
65 35
66 35
67 15
68 20
69 35
70 27
71 4
72 3
73 7
74 16
75 24
76 8
77 22
78 24
79 10
80 14
81 20